RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    An Empirical Analysis on Performance Inconsistency among Environmental, Social and Governance Components of ESG Ratings

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109036184

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Purpose - The purpose of this study is to empirically investigate the degree of performance inconsistency among the Environmental, Social and Governance ratings.
    Design/methodology/approach - This study performs regression analysis using the widely used ESG ratings published by the Korea Institute of Corporate Governance and Sustainability.
    Findings - The results show that firms often do not show consistent performance across the Environmental, Social and Governance aspects, with excellent performance on one aspect but mediocre or poor performance on another. The paper also finds some degree of firm-level persistence in such performance inconsistency, suggesting that the traits of the firm and the industry the firm belongs to might influence whether a firm shows inconsistent performance across the three aspects.
    Research implications or Originality - This paper highlights the need for researchers and practitioners to understand the underlying behavior of the individual E, S and G ratings, instead of taking them as given, in order to properly design their analyses.
    번역하기

    Purpose - The purpose of this study is to empirically investigate the degree of performance inconsistency among the Environmental, Social and Governance ratings. Design/methodology/approach - This study performs regression analysis using the widely us...

    Purpose - The purpose of this study is to empirically investigate the degree of performance inconsistency among the Environmental, Social and Governance ratings.
    Design/methodology/approach - This study performs regression analysis using the widely used ESG ratings published by the Korea Institute of Corporate Governance and Sustainability.
    Findings - The results show that firms often do not show consistent performance across the Environmental, Social and Governance aspects, with excellent performance on one aspect but mediocre or poor performance on another. The paper also finds some degree of firm-level persistence in such performance inconsistency, suggesting that the traits of the firm and the industry the firm belongs to might influence whether a firm shows inconsistent performance across the three aspects.
    Research implications or Originality - This paper highlights the need for researchers and practitioners to understand the underlying behavior of the individual E, S and G ratings, instead of taking them as given, in order to properly design their analyses.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Bansal, M., "The Sustainability Reporting-Firm Performance Nexus : Evidence from a Threshold Model" 12 (12): 491-512, 2021

    2 동맹 ; 백강, "The Effect of ESG Ratings on the Value of Chinese Listed Companies" 13 (13): 153-166, 2022

    3 김광민 ; 이헌상, "The Effect of ESG Rates on Corporate Value and Cost of Debt, Credit Rating" 13 (13): 94-121, 2021

    4 Velte, P., "The Bidirectional Relationship between ESG Performance and Earnings Management-Empirical Evidence from Germany" 10 (10): 322-338, 2019

    5 Benson, K. L., "Socially Responsible Investment Funds : Investor Reaction to Current and Past Returns" 32 : 1850-1859, 2008

    6 Billio, M., "Inside the ESG Ratings : (Dis)agreement and Performance" 28 (28): 1426-1445, 2021

    7 Han, Jaejoon, "Empirical Study on Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance in Korea" 1 : 61-76, 2016

    8 Ademi, B., "Does It Pay to Deliver Superior ESG Performance? Evidence from US S&P 500 Companies" 13 (13): 421-449, 2022

    9 Velte, P., "Does ESG Performance Have an Impact on Financial Performance? Evidence from Germany" 8 (8): 169-178, 2017

    10 Hartzmark, S. M., "Do Investors Value Sustainability? A Natural Experiment Examining Ranking and Fund Flows" 74 (74): 2789-2837, 2019

    1 Bansal, M., "The Sustainability Reporting-Firm Performance Nexus : Evidence from a Threshold Model" 12 (12): 491-512, 2021

    2 동맹 ; 백강, "The Effect of ESG Ratings on the Value of Chinese Listed Companies" 13 (13): 153-166, 2022

    3 김광민 ; 이헌상, "The Effect of ESG Rates on Corporate Value and Cost of Debt, Credit Rating" 13 (13): 94-121, 2021

    4 Velte, P., "The Bidirectional Relationship between ESG Performance and Earnings Management-Empirical Evidence from Germany" 10 (10): 322-338, 2019

    5 Benson, K. L., "Socially Responsible Investment Funds : Investor Reaction to Current and Past Returns" 32 : 1850-1859, 2008

    6 Billio, M., "Inside the ESG Ratings : (Dis)agreement and Performance" 28 (28): 1426-1445, 2021

    7 Han, Jaejoon, "Empirical Study on Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance in Korea" 1 : 61-76, 2016

    8 Ademi, B., "Does It Pay to Deliver Superior ESG Performance? Evidence from US S&P 500 Companies" 13 (13): 421-449, 2022

    9 Velte, P., "Does ESG Performance Have an Impact on Financial Performance? Evidence from Germany" 8 (8): 169-178, 2017

    10 Hartzmark, S. M., "Do Investors Value Sustainability? A Natural Experiment Examining Ranking and Fund Flows" 74 (74): 2789-2837, 2019

    11 이정기 ; 이재혁, "Current Status and Future Directions of Research on ‘Sustainable Management’: Focusing on the ESG Measurement Index" 23 (23): 65-92, 2020

    12 Fernando, C. S., "Corporate Environmental Policy and Shareholder Value : Following the Smart Money" 52 : 2023-2051, 2017

    13 Berg, F., "Aggregate Confusion : The Divergence of ESG Ratings" 26 (26): 1315-1344, 2022

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼