예측소음도와 설문결과를 이용한 철도소음 노출-반응 모델

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The suggested method of previous Son's study dichotomized subjective response data to modeling noise exposure-response. The method used maximum liklihood estimation instead of least square estimation and the noise exposure-response curve of the study was logistic regression analysis result. The method was originated to modeling community response rate such as %HA or %A. It can be useful when the subjective response was investigated based on predicted noise level. It is difficult to measure the single source emitting noise such as railway because various traffic noise sources combined in our life. The suggested method was adopted to model in this study and railway noise-exposure response curves were modeled because the noise level of this area was predicted data. The data of this study was used by previous Ko's paper but he dealt the area as combined noise area and divided the data by dominant noise source. But this study used all data of this area because the annoyance response to railway noise was higher than other noise according to the result of correlation analysis. The trend of the %HA and %A prediction model to train noise of this study is almost same as the model based on measured noise of previous Lim's study although the investigated areas and methods were different.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 손진희, "예측소음도를 이용한 어노이언스 예측모델을 위한 로지스틱 회귀분석의 적용방법" 한국소음진동공학회 20 (20): 555-561, 2010

2 고준희, "도로교통소음과 철도소음 복합노출지역에서의 성가심 반응" 한국소음진동공학회 20 (20): 172-178, 2010

3 WHO, "WHO Technical Meeting on Noise and Health Indicators - Second Meeting Results of the Testing and Piloting in Member States (Meeting report)" World Health Organization (WHO) 2003

4 Fidell, S., "Updating a Dosage–5effect Relationship for the Prevalence of Annoyance due to General Transportation Noise" 89 (89): 221-223, 1991

5 Lim, C. W., "The Relationship between Railway Noise and Community Annoyance in Korea" 120 (120): 2037-2042, 2006

6 Kaku, J, "The Possibility of a Bonus for Evaluating Railway Noise in Japan" 193 (193): 445-450, 1996

7 Schultz, T. J., "Synthesis of Social Surveys on Noise Annoyance" 64 (64): 377-405, 1978

8 Öhrström, E., "Relationships between Annoyance and Exposure to Single and Combined Noise from Railway and Road Traffic" 2007

9 European Communities, "Position Paper on Dose Response Relationships between Transportation Noise and Annoyance" European Communities 2002

10 Miedema, H. M. E, "Exposure-response Relationships for Transportation Noise" 104 (104): 3432-3445, 1998

11 WHO, "Environmental Health Indicators: Development of a Methodology for the WHO European Region" World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe 2002

12 Fields, J. M., "Effect of Personal and Situational Variables on Noise Annoyance in Residential Areas" 93 (93): 2753-2763, 1993

13 Miedema, H. M. E, "Demographic and Attitudinal Factors That Modify Annoyance from Transportation Noise" 105 (105): 3336-3344, 1999

14 Finegold, L. S., "Community Annoyance and Sleep Disturbance: Updated Driteria for Assessing the Impacts of General Transportation Noise on People" 42 (42): 25-30, 1994