RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      AI학습용 데이터구조 및 데이터셋의 물건특허 인정방안 = Recognition Measures of Product Patent in Data Structures and Datasets for AI Learning

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110105582

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      To create an AI model, a data structure or data set is essential for deep learning training. Furthermore the data structure is used as comparison data with the data input by the user into the AI model and plays an important role in learning and reasoning. A data structure refers to the logical structure of data that represents the interrelationships between data elements, and the data structure itself cannot be patented because it can be processed by a computer or viewed as a collection that can access or search to/for materials (data).
      However, the technological idea as an algorithm in which the data structure is stored in deep learning programs for AI learning and used as an information processing means to solve specific task, can be considered as an invention utilizing the laws of nature. Although the current AI Examination Practice Guide recognizes data structure storage medium claims as product inventions, claims for data structures are being rejected under Article 42, Paragraph 4, Subparagraph 2 of the Patent Act on the grounds that it is not clear whether the category of invention is an object or a method, and there is a problem that effective data protection cannot be achieved.
      To address these issues, it is necessary to recognize data structures as product inventions, on the premise that the claim specifies the means of processing information processed by a specific structure in hardware such as computer etc. In cases where claims end with phrases such as “... data having a structure” or “... data structure (set),” an active consideration should be given to revising the patent law or examination standards to recognize them as product inventions.
      번역하기

      To create an AI model, a data structure or data set is essential for deep learning training. Furthermore the data structure is used as comparison data with the data input by the user into the AI model and plays an important role in learning and reason...

      To create an AI model, a data structure or data set is essential for deep learning training. Furthermore the data structure is used as comparison data with the data input by the user into the AI model and plays an important role in learning and reasoning. A data structure refers to the logical structure of data that represents the interrelationships between data elements, and the data structure itself cannot be patented because it can be processed by a computer or viewed as a collection that can access or search to/for materials (data).
      However, the technological idea as an algorithm in which the data structure is stored in deep learning programs for AI learning and used as an information processing means to solve specific task, can be considered as an invention utilizing the laws of nature. Although the current AI Examination Practice Guide recognizes data structure storage medium claims as product inventions, claims for data structures are being rejected under Article 42, Paragraph 4, Subparagraph 2 of the Patent Act on the grounds that it is not clear whether the category of invention is an object or a method, and there is a problem that effective data protection cannot be achieved.
      To address these issues, it is necessary to recognize data structures as product inventions, on the premise that the claim specifies the means of processing information processed by a specific structure in hardware such as computer etc. In cases where claims end with phrases such as “... data having a structure” or “... data structure (set),” an active consideration should be given to revising the patent law or examination standards to recognize them as product inventions.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼