RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      자본시장법상 단기매매차익 반환제도와 향후 운용방향에 대한 검토 - 대법원 2010.8.19. 선고 2007다66002 판결의 평석을 겸하여 - = A Study on Short-Swing Profit Rule and More Efficient Deterrence of Insider Trading under FISCMA in Korea

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Article 172 of Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act (‘FISCMA’) in Korea requires company insiders to return any profits made from the purchase and sale of company specific securities if both transactions occur within a six-month period. These short-swing profit rule was implemented to prevent insiders, who have greater access to material company information, from taking advantage of information for the purpose of making short-term profits. However, recently, new legal issues for short-swing profit rule have occurred in connection with transaction of hybrid financial instruments or derivatives, and the rapid change of exchange rate.
      Some commenters question that given the development of the general insider trading regulations under article 174, and the substantial limitations of article 172 in preventing insider trading, is the article 172 needed? Some critics also argue that the function of article 172 would appear to be to impose unjust liability upon entirely innocent persons. However, I believe that article 172 has a “symbolic significance” in the war against insider trading because the insider trading scandals may have shaken investors’confidence in the stock market. Article 172 still serves important public policy purposes by removing the temptation for corporate officers by removing the temptation to profit from short-term price fluctuations, and penalizing the use of inside information.
      Part Ⅱ discuss new legal issues for short-swing profit rule, recently,which have been brought up. Parts Ⅲ then present a real case which was rendered recently by Korean Supreme Court, and analysis concept, method of calculation for short-swing profit. Lastly, Part Ⅳ of this Article discuss whether article 172 violate the Less Restrictive Alternative Principle under Constitution, and future operational means.
      번역하기

      Article 172 of Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act (‘FISCMA’) in Korea requires company insiders to return any profits made from the purchase and sale of company specific securities if both transactions occur within a six-month p...

      Article 172 of Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act (‘FISCMA’) in Korea requires company insiders to return any profits made from the purchase and sale of company specific securities if both transactions occur within a six-month period. These short-swing profit rule was implemented to prevent insiders, who have greater access to material company information, from taking advantage of information for the purpose of making short-term profits. However, recently, new legal issues for short-swing profit rule have occurred in connection with transaction of hybrid financial instruments or derivatives, and the rapid change of exchange rate.
      Some commenters question that given the development of the general insider trading regulations under article 174, and the substantial limitations of article 172 in preventing insider trading, is the article 172 needed? Some critics also argue that the function of article 172 would appear to be to impose unjust liability upon entirely innocent persons. However, I believe that article 172 has a “symbolic significance” in the war against insider trading because the insider trading scandals may have shaken investors’confidence in the stock market. Article 172 still serves important public policy purposes by removing the temptation for corporate officers by removing the temptation to profit from short-term price fluctuations, and penalizing the use of inside information.
      Part Ⅱ discuss new legal issues for short-swing profit rule, recently,which have been brought up. Parts Ⅲ then present a real case which was rendered recently by Korean Supreme Court, and analysis concept, method of calculation for short-swing profit. Lastly, Part Ⅳ of this Article discuss whether article 172 violate the Less Restrictive Alternative Principle under Constitution, and future operational means.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 장상균, "지배주식의 매도에 대한 증권거래법상 단기매매차익 반환조항의 적용" 서울대 금융법센터 (5) : 2004

      2 정준우, "증권거래법상의 단기매매차익 반환규정에 관한 고찰" 인하대 법학연구소 5 : 2002

      3 고창현, "증권거래법상 단기매매차익 반환의무" 대한변호사협회 (277) : 1999

      4 김정수, "자본시장법원론" SFL그룹 2011

      5 성희활, "자본시장법상 단기매매차익반환제도에 관한 고찰 -체계 변화에 대한 평가와 향후 개선방향 고찰-" 한국증권법학회 12 (12): 285-312, 2011

      6 김상철, "자본시장법상 단기매매차익 반환제도의 매매 개념과 적용제외 사유에관한 연구" 법원도서관 48 : 2009

      7 김건식, "자본시장법 2판" 두성사 2010

      8 임재연, "자본시장법" 박영사 2011

      9 김용재, "자본시장과 법(상)" 고려대학교출판부 2011

      10 이철송, "유가증권의 단기매매차익 반환과 정보이용의 중요성" 한국증권법학회 5 (5): 171-194, 2004

      1 장상균, "지배주식의 매도에 대한 증권거래법상 단기매매차익 반환조항의 적용" 서울대 금융법센터 (5) : 2004

      2 정준우, "증권거래법상의 단기매매차익 반환규정에 관한 고찰" 인하대 법학연구소 5 : 2002

      3 고창현, "증권거래법상 단기매매차익 반환의무" 대한변호사협회 (277) : 1999

      4 김정수, "자본시장법원론" SFL그룹 2011

      5 성희활, "자본시장법상 단기매매차익반환제도에 관한 고찰 -체계 변화에 대한 평가와 향후 개선방향 고찰-" 한국증권법학회 12 (12): 285-312, 2011

      6 김상철, "자본시장법상 단기매매차익 반환제도의 매매 개념과 적용제외 사유에관한 연구" 법원도서관 48 : 2009

      7 김건식, "자본시장법 2판" 두성사 2010

      8 임재연, "자본시장법" 박영사 2011

      9 김용재, "자본시장과 법(상)" 고려대학교출판부 2011

      10 이철송, "유가증권의 단기매매차익 반환과 정보이용의 중요성" 한국증권법학회 5 (5): 171-194, 2004

      11 최민용, "단기매매차익의 반환 - 매매의 개념을 중심으로 -" 한국상사판례학회 19 (19): 155-185, 2006

      12 성승제, "단기매매차익 반환의무-대법원 2005.3.25. 선고 2004다30040 판결-" 한국상사판례학회 18 (18): 187-212, 2005

      13 노태악, "내부자거래 등 관련 행위의 규제, In 증권거래에 관한 제문제(상)" 법원도서관 90 : 2001

      14 금융감독원, "금융감독개론" 금융감독원 2007

      15 森田章, "證券取引法164條1項の趣旨とその要件" (1246) : 2003

      16 黑沼悅郞, "短期賣買差益の返還規定の合憲性" 有斐閣 (1228) : 2002

      17 "http://www.sec.gov"

      18 "http://www.fsc.go.kr"

      19 "http://likms.assembly.go.kr"

      20 "http://law.e-gov.go.jp"

      21 Thomas Lee Hazen, "Treatise on the Law of Securities Regulation. Vol. 3" Thomson West 2002

      22 Marleen A. O'Connor, "Toward A More Efficient Deterence of Insider Trading : The Repeal of Section 16(b)" 58 : 309-, 1989

      23 Pamela J. Reardon, "The Significance of Congressional Intent and Statutory Purpose in Defining Profits Realized in Section 16(B) Litigation : CBI Industries v. Horton" 16 : 433-, 1984

      24 Hui Huang, "The Regulation of Insider Trading in China: A Critical Review and Proposals for Reform" 17 : 2-, 2005

      25 Lui Duan, "The Ongoing Battle against Insider Trading : A Comparison of Chinese and U.S. Law and Comments on How China Should Improve its Insider Trading Law Enforcement Regime" 12 : 129-, 2009

      26 Thomas Lee Hazen, "The Law of Securities Regulation, 5th ed" Thomson West 2006

      27 John C. Coffee, "Securities Regulation -Cases and Materials-, 11th ed" Foundation Press 2009

      28 Committee on Federal Regulation of Securities, "Report of the Task Force on Regulation of Insider Trading" 16 (16): 1087-, 1987

      29 Peter G. Samuels, "Liability for Short-Swing Profits and Reporting Obligations under Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934" 1513 : 493-, 2005

      30 Ishizumi, "Insider Trading Regulation: An Examination of Section 16(b) and a Proposal for Japan" 47 : 449-, 1979

      31 Securities and Exchange Board of India, "Consultative Paper on Introduction of ‘Short Swing Profit’ Regulation in India"

      32 Arnold S. Jacobs, "Analysis of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934" 32 : 209-, 1987

      33 "2 ALI, Fed. Sec. Code § 1714 commentary"

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-05-07 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> KOREAN COMMERCIAL LAW ASSOCIATION KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-10-18 학술지등록 한글명 : 상사법연구
      외국어명 : 미등록
      KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1 1 1.07
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.96 0.93 0.979 0.58
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼