RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    中間省略登記請求權 = A Claim for Registration without Intermediate- Registration

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76484474

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Not only present states but formalities of the transfer of a real right must be registerd from the viewpoint of the ideal of the real estate registration system. But It could not be said that the registration is not valid on account of the defect in its formalities, if the registration of present states of the right is valid. But even so, I do not think that the last vendee can claim for the transfer of registration to himself from the original vendor. It is same even though all parties are agreed for the omission of intermediate formalities.
    In this point, I think that some facts must be considered in discussion of a 'Claim for Registration without Intermediate Registration'.
    First, a 'Claim for Registration without Intermediate Registration' can not be accept even if a forbidden clause in the 'Act on Special Measures for the Registration of Real Estate' is regarded as a supervision clause. Because it is the problem of the private law.
    Second, even though we accept the validity of a 'Claim for Registration without Intermediate Registration', we must consider the harmony with the practical affairs of he registration in the 'Registration of Real Estate Act'.
    Third, we must be careful with the difference of the validity between the registration which already made and a 'claim for registration without intermediate registration'.
    Forth, the consideration for the cause of the claim should be assumed in investigating into acception of a 'claim for registration without intermediate registration'.
    In conclusion, from the viewpoint of the above facts, I think that a 'claim for registration without intermediate registration' does not have the authority. So it is not valid, it must not be accepted.
    The 'registration without intermediate registration' is often used for the sake of an evasion of the law; a slip from the grip of the law, for example, tax evasion or speculation, etc. There is no any reason for the accepting the validity of the 'registration without intermediate registration'.
    번역하기

    Not only present states but formalities of the transfer of a real right must be registerd from the viewpoint of the ideal of the real estate registration system. But It could not be said that the registration is not valid on account of the defect in i...

    Not only present states but formalities of the transfer of a real right must be registerd from the viewpoint of the ideal of the real estate registration system. But It could not be said that the registration is not valid on account of the defect in its formalities, if the registration of present states of the right is valid. But even so, I do not think that the last vendee can claim for the transfer of registration to himself from the original vendor. It is same even though all parties are agreed for the omission of intermediate formalities.
    In this point, I think that some facts must be considered in discussion of a 'Claim for Registration without Intermediate Registration'.
    First, a 'Claim for Registration without Intermediate Registration' can not be accept even if a forbidden clause in the 'Act on Special Measures for the Registration of Real Estate' is regarded as a supervision clause. Because it is the problem of the private law.
    Second, even though we accept the validity of a 'Claim for Registration without Intermediate Registration', we must consider the harmony with the practical affairs of he registration in the 'Registration of Real Estate Act'.
    Third, we must be careful with the difference of the validity between the registration which already made and a 'claim for registration without intermediate registration'.
    Forth, the consideration for the cause of the claim should be assumed in investigating into acception of a 'claim for registration without intermediate registration'.
    In conclusion, from the viewpoint of the above facts, I think that a 'claim for registration without intermediate registration' does not have the authority. So it is not valid, it must not be accepted.
    The 'registration without intermediate registration' is often used for the sake of an evasion of the law; a slip from the grip of the law, for example, tax evasion or speculation, etc. There is no any reason for the accepting the validity of the 'registration without intermediate registration'.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Abstract
    • Ⅰ. 들어가는 글
    • Ⅱ. 학설과 판례
    • Ⅲ. 학설과 판례의 검토
    • Ⅳ. 마치며
    • Abstract
    • Ⅰ. 들어가는 글
    • Ⅱ. 학설과 판례
    • Ⅲ. 학설과 판례의 검토
    • Ⅳ. 마치며
    • 참고문헌
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼