18세기 조선의 청조인식-『노가재연행일기』를 중심으로 = The 18^th Century Joseon Dynasty’s Recognition on Qing Dynasty - mainly with 『NoGaJaeYeonHaengIlgi』

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In the 17^th century, the substitution of the Qing Dynasty for the Ming Dynasty was the incidentin which the Ming Dynasty that was ‘the Mainland China’s Splendid Civilization’ was destroyed by the Qing Dynasty that was ‘the barbarian intruder’and the Mainland China’s Splendid Civilization became extinct in the world of which the center was thought to be the mainland China by intellectuals in China and some Asian countries, and Joseon that surrendered to the armed force of the Qing Dynasty was included in the order of tribute to an dinstallation by the Qing Dynasty, however ideologically the theory of ‘Qing= barbarian intruder’ and ‘Joseon = the Mainland China’s Splendid Civilization’ began.
But after the fall of the Ming Dynasty, on the contrary the Qing Dynasty showed heyday without hesitation, Confucian scholars in Joseon had to newly interpret the zenith of the prosperity of ‘the barbarian intruder’.
In that situation, in Joseon two ideologies appeared, one ideological flow was the ‘Joseon’s Splendid Civilization Principle’ and another was the ‘Learning from the North’ that Joseon needed to learn the Qing’s advanced products of civilization.
However, Kim Changeop visited the Qing Dynasty in person in the earlier period of the 18th century and wrote the traveler's journal 『NoGaJaeYeonHaengIlgi』, and in his awareness of the Qing Dynasty, ‘Joseon’s Splendid Civilization Principle’ coexisted with ‘Learning from the North’ that acknowledged the Qing Dynasty’s advanced products of civilization, while the two ideologies crossed each other.
Kim Changeop, a direct descendant of Kim Sangheon who advocated the theory of the rejection of peace at the time of the Manchu war of 1636 to have spent a long time in captivity in the Qing Dynasty, boasted of the superiority of Joseon’s ‘Manners, Music and the Products of Civilization’ to his heart's content while he had affirmative awareness of the Qing Dynasty’s practical products of civilization instead of ‘the Opinion to take Revenge on the Qing’.
Therefore, the ‘Learning from the North’ is thought not to be the ideology that appeared suddenly but is thought to have appeared gradually as the interchange with the Qing Dynasty by visit of envoy to Qing and the experience in and the awareness of advanced products of civilization accumulated.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이학당, "金昌業의 明末淸初 戰爭 記憶" 동방한문학회 (60) : 175-198, 2014

2 이철성, "통신사․왜관과 한일관계" 경인문화사 2005

3 정옥자, "조선후기 조선중화사상연구" 일지사 1998

4 김양수, "조선후기 倭語譯官 -『譯科榜目』의 분석을 중심으로-" 역사실학회 37 : 71-124, 2008

5 우경섭, "조선중화주의의 성립과 동아시아" 유니스토리 2013

6 윤남한, "조선시대의 양명학 연구" 집문당 1982

7 지두환, "조선시대 사상사의 재조명" 역사문화 1998

8 정혜중, "조선 선비의 청국 수도 北京見聞―김창업의 『稼齋燕行錄』을 중심으로―" 명청사학회 (23) : 33-66, 2005

9 하정식, "일그러진 초상-조선지배층의 강희제상" (39) : 2017

10 김인규, "북학사상연구" 심산 2017

11 서의, "김창업과 청조 문사의 교유에 관한 고찰" (13) : 2010

12 이장우, "국역연행록선집Ⅳ" 경인문화사 1976

13 허봉, "荷谷先生朝天記 ; 국역연행록선집 Ⅰ" 민족문화추진회 1976

14 桂島宣弘, "自他認識の思想史" 有志舎 2008

15 김창업, "稼齋燕行錄；국역연행록선집Ⅳ" 민족문화추진회 1976

16 紙屋敦之, "琉球と日本․中国" 山川出版社 2003

17 박지원, "燕巖集" 민족문화추진회 2004

18 홍대용, "湛軒書" 민족문화추진회 1989

19 朝尾直, "日本の近世1－世界史の中の近世" 中央公論社 1991

20 荒野泰典, "日本の対外関係6" 吉川弘文館 2010

21 桂島宣弘, "思想史の十九世紀―｢他者｣としての徳川日本" ぺりかん社 1999

22 홍성욱, "孟子" 고려원북스 2005

23 이호윤, "『하곡선생조천기(荷谷先生朝天記)』와 중국 인식" 아세아문제연구소 59 (59): 62-82, 2016

24 최소자, "18세기 金昌業, 洪大容, 朴趾源의 중국인식" 명청사학회 (32) : 1-37, 2009

25 송미령, "18세기 조선 지식인이 본 淸朝의 統治" 명청사학회 (23) : 67-96, 2005