RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      美聯邦大統領의 赦免權에 관한 소고 = A Study on the Presidential Pardoning Power in the United States

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76484302

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Even though the presidential pardon has its root from an absolute royal prerogative power of the English King, it shall serve the public welfare under the contemporary constitutionalism. Presidential pardons afford relief from overly harsh judgments or prejudice in the operation or enforcement of criminal law. The pardon power also operates as a check on the judicial branch of the government. Throughout the United States constitutional history, however, there have been occasions when the pardon power was abused. More recently, a number of pardons have been granted to improper persons, during President Clinton's terms in office, and therefore improper influence led to a string of unjustifiable presidential pardons.
      This note examines the history and nature of the pardon power, kinds of clemency, how a pardon is granted, whether there are any limitations that may be imposed on the presidential pardon power, and how the exercise of the pardon power can be restricted, when it is abused. Especially, a presidential exercise of the pardon power shall be reviewed by the United States Supreme Court, when it might result in an invasion of constitutional rights, such as equal protection and due process guarantees, because it cannot present political questions anymore. Futhermore, since the current Pardon Clause in the United States Constitution seems be not effective to check the abuse of the power, the revision of the Clause, like the belows, may be still a matter of debate:
      “No pardon granted an individual by the President under section 2 of Article II shall be effective if two-thirds of the Senate, by resolution, disapproves the granting of the pardon within 60 days.”
      번역하기

      Even though the presidential pardon has its root from an absolute royal prerogative power of the English King, it shall serve the public welfare under the contemporary constitutionalism. Presidential pardons afford relief from overly harsh judgments o...

      Even though the presidential pardon has its root from an absolute royal prerogative power of the English King, it shall serve the public welfare under the contemporary constitutionalism. Presidential pardons afford relief from overly harsh judgments or prejudice in the operation or enforcement of criminal law. The pardon power also operates as a check on the judicial branch of the government. Throughout the United States constitutional history, however, there have been occasions when the pardon power was abused. More recently, a number of pardons have been granted to improper persons, during President Clinton's terms in office, and therefore improper influence led to a string of unjustifiable presidential pardons.
      This note examines the history and nature of the pardon power, kinds of clemency, how a pardon is granted, whether there are any limitations that may be imposed on the presidential pardon power, and how the exercise of the pardon power can be restricted, when it is abused. Especially, a presidential exercise of the pardon power shall be reviewed by the United States Supreme Court, when it might result in an invasion of constitutional rights, such as equal protection and due process guarantees, because it cannot present political questions anymore. Futhermore, since the current Pardon Clause in the United States Constitution seems be not effective to check the abuse of the power, the revision of the Clause, like the belows, may be still a matter of debate:
      “No pardon granted an individual by the President under section 2 of Article II shall be effective if two-thirds of the Senate, by resolution, disapproves the granting of the pardon within 60 days.”

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • ABSTRACT
      • Ⅰ. 序說
      • Ⅱ. 美國憲法上 赦免制度의 成立
      • Ⅲ. 美國 赦免制度의 實際
      • Ⅳ. 赦免權의 限界와 統制
      • ABSTRACT
      • Ⅰ. 序說
      • Ⅱ. 美國憲法上 赦免制度의 成立
      • Ⅲ. 美國 赦免制度의 實際
      • Ⅳ. 赦免權의 限界와 統制
      • Ⅴ. 結語: 우리 憲法에의 시사점
      • 참고문헌
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.84 0.84 0.73
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.69 0.69 0.687 0.35
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼