RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    A Centering Dynamics Approach to Zero Pronouns in Korean

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76196806

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study examines 249 utterances from a corpus of newspaper articles, focusing on the distribution of zero subjects and zero objects. Two kinds of approach, centering theory in Grosz et al. (1995) and centering dynamics in Kameyama (1996, 1998), are compared to find out which approach is more general to explain the distribution of zeros in Korean texts. At first, this study analyzes the data based on centering theory in Grosz et al. (1995) and finds out that this approach is defective in two respects. One is that the occurrence of zeros is not only closely related with CONTINUE transitions but also fairly related with SMOOTH-SHIFT transitions. The other is that the occurrence of zero objects is not explained based on centering transitions. As an alternative approach, this study re-examines the distribution of zeros based on Kameyama's centering dynamics, and concludes that centering dynamics is more general in that it can cover the defects of centering theory. In addition, it is maintained that the distribution of zero objects can be explained based on the notion of Parallelism Preference.
    번역하기

    This study examines 249 utterances from a corpus of newspaper articles, focusing on the distribution of zero subjects and zero objects. Two kinds of approach, centering theory in Grosz et al. (1995) and centering dynamics in Kameyama (1996, 1998), are...

    This study examines 249 utterances from a corpus of newspaper articles, focusing on the distribution of zero subjects and zero objects. Two kinds of approach, centering theory in Grosz et al. (1995) and centering dynamics in Kameyama (1996, 1998), are compared to find out which approach is more general to explain the distribution of zeros in Korean texts. At first, this study analyzes the data based on centering theory in Grosz et al. (1995) and finds out that this approach is defective in two respects. One is that the occurrence of zeros is not only closely related with CONTINUE transitions but also fairly related with SMOOTH-SHIFT transitions. The other is that the occurrence of zero objects is not explained based on centering transitions. As an alternative approach, this study re-examines the distribution of zeros based on Kameyama's centering dynamics, and concludes that centering dynamics is more general in that it can cover the defects of centering theory. In addition, it is maintained that the distribution of zero objects can be explained based on the notion of Parallelism Preference.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. Data
    • 3. Analysis of zero pronouns in Grosz et al (1995)'s Framework
    • 4. Analysis of zero pronouns in Kameyama (1998)'s Framework
    • 5. Conclusion
    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. Data
    • 3. Analysis of zero pronouns in Grosz et al (1995)'s Framework
    • 4. Analysis of zero pronouns in Kameyama (1998)'s Framework
    • 5. Conclusion
    • References
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2014-09-01 학회명변경 영문명 :   -> The Discourse and Cognitive Linguistics Society of Korea KCI등재
    2014-01-10 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Discourse and Cognition KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-12-29 학회명변경 한글명 : 담화ㆍ인지언어학회 -> 담화·인지언어학회
    영문명 : 미등록 ->  
    KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-04-29 학술지등록 한글명 : 담화와 인지
    외국어명 : 미등록
    KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2000-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.44 0.44 0.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.49 0.53 0.841 0.22
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼