한국의 해양경계획정 문제에 대한 소고 ― 2009년 ICJ의 흑해해양경계획정 판결을 참고로 하여 ― = Several Issues on the Maritime Boundary Delimitation of Korea ― With Special Reference to the Case Concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea of 2009 ―

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

South Korea is bordered by North Korea on the north ; it is facing Japan and China, opposite the sea. South Korea therefore has the task of setting maritime boundaries with these neighboring countries.
With North Korea, South Korea will have no choice but to recognize as a provisional maritime boundary the Northern Limit Line as long as the two Koreas continue to coexist under the Armistice Agreement. The reunification of North and South Korea would require a re-examination of the entire Korean peninsula's maritime delimitations. This means fresh rounds of negotiations on maritime boundaries would have to take place with not only Russia and China, border countries of a unified Korea, but also with Japan.
With China, the problem is the Yellow Sea and the East China Sea. Unlike the case with Japan, there are no major stumbling blocks that will tangle delimitation negotiations with China, for there exist no disputed islands between the two countries. However, the two countries' negotiation on maritime delimitation will not come to an agreement in the near future because Seoul and Beijing have two distinct views on maritime delimitation criteria.
With Japan, the delimitation issue spans from the East Sea to the East China Sea, and neither front offers any easy solutions. In the East Sea, the solution of the outstanding problem-Dokdo-will be contingent upon how the various issues in surrounding maritime zones are handled. In the East China Sea, the most significant issue is whether the two countries can draw a single boundary for the continental shelf and the EEZ or separate boundaries respectively.
Taking account of above mentioned circumstances, this paper is going to look into relevant issues of maritime boundaries around Korean peninsular, with special reference to the case concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea(Romania v. Ukraine). Firstly, current status of international cases as well as process of establishment of maritime boundaries are explained. Secondly, respective positions of Northeast Asian countries with respect to the maritime boundary delimitation are examined. Thirdly, relevant issues on the maritime delimitation case in the Black Sea is discussed.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 해양법포럼, "영불대륙붕 사건"

2 이창위, "대륙붕 한계의 법적 성질에 대한 고찰" 한국해사법학회 17 (17): 205

3 이창위, "그린랜드와 얀마이엔 사이의 해양경계획정사건" (2) : 480-491, 1998

4 崔宗和, "現代國際海洋法"

5 山本草二, "海洋法と國內法制"

6 水上千之, "海洋法" 有信堂 135-136, 2005

7 小田 滋, "注解國聯海洋法條約 (上)"

8 村瀨信也, "日中大陸棚境界劃定問題"

9 奧脇直也, "排他的經濟水域の境界劃定" 1 : 62-66, 1997

10 許淑娟, "境界周辺海域における大陸棚共同開発" (1365) : 2008

11 奧脇直也, "前揭書"

12 松井芳郞(編), "判例國際法" 東信堂 173-176, 2006

13 人民日報, "人民日報"

14 Satya N. Nandan, "United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea-1982 A Commentary" II : 956-960, 1993