한라산 경관분석에 관한 연구 = Studies on Landscape Analysis of Halla Mountain

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The landscape is an existed phenomenon by human, who is a subject of landscape, looking at an object like geographical features, trees, and artificial construction. The landscape objects have various characteristics like location, size, color, shape, line, quality and shade. Regarding landscape as a dimensional object which is able to recognize visually or cognitively, landscape analysis is a work to catch spatial meaning and material characteristic of landscape appeared in the visual and cognitive process.
Considering the characteristic of Mt. Halla in the type of landscape evaluation, the standard of evaluation was established with the consideration of main evaluation of visual landscape, a formal aesthetic approach and a psychological approach. Among the evaluation technique suggested a formal aesthetic approach and a psychological approach, considering the landscape characteristic of Mt. Halla, techniques like establishment of landscape unit, evaluation of landscape beauty based on landscape unit, capacity for visual absorption, and analysis of visual area were adopted. As a result of analysis, main view point from the top of Mt. Halla to Wiseorum had wide visual range, low capacity for visual absorption and very hogh landscape beauty. Analysing from Wiseorum to Arimok, No.2, No.3 and No.4 were cery wide visual range, low capacorty for visual absorption and very high landscape beaury. However, from No.5 to No.6 was non visual area, high capacity for visual absorption and high landscape beauty. Analysing from Wiseorum to Arimok, No.2 and main view point No.1 had wide visual range, high capacity for visual absorption and high landscape beauty. No.3 was narrow visual range, high capacity for visual absorption and high landscape beauty. Though main view point No.2, No.3 and No.4 had wide visual range, low capacity for visual absorption and very high landscape beauty, No.4 was non visual area, high capacity for viaual absorption and hogh landscape beauty. At Songpanak course, main view point No.1, No.2, and No.4 had wide visual range, low capacity for vosual absorption and high landacape beauty, However, from No.2 and No.3 to No.9 was non visual area, hogh capacity for visual absorption and high landscape beauty. At Lwanumsa course, main view point No.1, No.2 and No.3 had wide visual range, low capacity for visual absorption and high landscape beauty. From No.1, No.2, No.3 to N.o8 and No.1 from the top of Songpanak to the top of Kwanumsa were non visual area, hogh capacity for visual absorption and middle landscape neauty. Main view point No.1, No.2, No.3, No.4, No.5, and No.6 was wide visual range, low capacity for visual absorption and very hogh landscape beauty. No.3 was non visual area, hogh capacety for visual absorption and hogh landscape beauty.
At Nambyuk course, main view point No.1, No.2, No.3 was wide visual range, low capacity for visual absorption and very high landscape beauty.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Abstract = 62
• Ⅰ. 서론 = 63
• Ⅱ. 한라산 경관분석의 범위와 기준 = 64
• Ⅲ. 한라산 경관분석의 결과 = 68
• Ⅳ. 요약 = 71
• 감사의 글 = 72
• Ⅴ. 참고 문헌 = 72