RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    중학교 기술 · 산업 교과의 실기 평가에 관한 연구

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107208486

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The objective of this study is to develop the practice evaluation standard, and to plan the detailed contents in each step of practice evaluation procedure model. To accomplish the above objectives, this study was carried out as following. (1) The tentative solutions were drawn out by collecting, analyzing, and synthesizing the related literature. (2) In order to verify the validity of the tentative solutions, twenty-two experts evaluated the solutions, and finally the researcher reviewed, revised and replenished them by the evaluated results. The tentative solutions by the researcher were asked to twenty-two experts to evaluated them, and twenty (7 professors and 13 teachers) of them had given the response back. The researcher sent the evaluation check list and the summary of study to them by mail. The evaluation check list was proposed to rate according to the degree of validity with Likert scale, five steps, about 9 items. if evaluator had alternatives or better improvements, they could directly describe them in the evaluation sheet. The results to rate with five step-scale were scored as follow : the mean and standard deviation were calculated by the scores. According to the results of the study from the evaluators, means of the hypothetic plan of each domain measures 3.80-4.20. Therefore, we can say that the validity is on high degree. In conclusion, the study synthesized the results from rating the hypothetic plan and the opinion provided with explanatory and other space, keeping the basic framework as it is and then suggestion of establishing the domain of practice evaluation.
    번역하기

    The objective of this study is to develop the practice evaluation standard, and to plan the detailed contents in each step of practice evaluation procedure model. To accomplish the above objectives, this study was carried out as following. (1) The ...

    The objective of this study is to develop the practice evaluation standard, and to plan the detailed contents in each step of practice evaluation procedure model. To accomplish the above objectives, this study was carried out as following. (1) The tentative solutions were drawn out by collecting, analyzing, and synthesizing the related literature. (2) In order to verify the validity of the tentative solutions, twenty-two experts evaluated the solutions, and finally the researcher reviewed, revised and replenished them by the evaluated results. The tentative solutions by the researcher were asked to twenty-two experts to evaluated them, and twenty (7 professors and 13 teachers) of them had given the response back. The researcher sent the evaluation check list and the summary of study to them by mail. The evaluation check list was proposed to rate according to the degree of validity with Likert scale, five steps, about 9 items. if evaluator had alternatives or better improvements, they could directly describe them in the evaluation sheet. The results to rate with five step-scale were scored as follow : the mean and standard deviation were calculated by the scores. According to the results of the study from the evaluators, means of the hypothetic plan of each domain measures 3.80-4.20. Therefore, we can say that the validity is on high degree. In conclusion, the study synthesized the results from rating the hypothetic plan and the opinion provided with explanatory and other space, keeping the basic framework as it is and then suggestion of establishing the domain of practice evaluation.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼