RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    토지분 재산세의 세부담 지원체계 연구 - 분리과세와 감면을 중심으로 - = The Study on the Tax Burden Relief Systems for Land Property Tax - Separate Taxation and Exemptions -

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109260852

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The policies of separate taxation and tax exemption, designed to alleviate the burden of property taxes on land, are important tools for reducing tax liability.
    However, there is a lack of clear criteria for their application. This study distinguishes the purpose of separate taxation into two categories: exclusion from aggregation for businesses that inevitably require large landholdings, and the necessity of policy support. The second category of separate taxation can be considered a form of tax expenditure when it aligns with the characteristics of tax expenditure, such as specificity, substitutability, and the possibility of repeal. This study analyzes instances where separate taxation and tax exemptions are redundantly applied to the same land in pursuit of identical policy objectives, demonstrating that this redundancy occurs due to the absence of a defined support period, leading to long-term entrenchment and vested interests. Based on these findings, the study presents the following policy recommendations. First, separate taxation for policy support purposes should be managed individually, taking into account the characteristics of tax expenditure for each item. Second, to enhance the efficiency of resource allocation, redundant support through both separate taxation and tax exemption should be avoided, and the best policy tool should be employed to achieve the policy objectives. Third, for cases where sunset provisions are necessary, the relevant separate taxation measures should be transferred to the Local Tax Special Cases Restriction Act and managed in an integrated manner with tax exemptions. Finally, in the medium to long term, separate taxation should be applied only to businesses where large-scale landholding is essential and temporary, while incentive systems aimed at inducing taxpayer behavior with significant economic impact should be unified under tax exemptions.
    번역하기

    The policies of separate taxation and tax exemption, designed to alleviate the burden of property taxes on land, are important tools for reducing tax liability. However, there is a lack of clear criteria for their application. This study distinguishes...

    The policies of separate taxation and tax exemption, designed to alleviate the burden of property taxes on land, are important tools for reducing tax liability.
    However, there is a lack of clear criteria for their application. This study distinguishes the purpose of separate taxation into two categories: exclusion from aggregation for businesses that inevitably require large landholdings, and the necessity of policy support. The second category of separate taxation can be considered a form of tax expenditure when it aligns with the characteristics of tax expenditure, such as specificity, substitutability, and the possibility of repeal. This study analyzes instances where separate taxation and tax exemptions are redundantly applied to the same land in pursuit of identical policy objectives, demonstrating that this redundancy occurs due to the absence of a defined support period, leading to long-term entrenchment and vested interests. Based on these findings, the study presents the following policy recommendations. First, separate taxation for policy support purposes should be managed individually, taking into account the characteristics of tax expenditure for each item. Second, to enhance the efficiency of resource allocation, redundant support through both separate taxation and tax exemption should be avoided, and the best policy tool should be employed to achieve the policy objectives. Third, for cases where sunset provisions are necessary, the relevant separate taxation measures should be transferred to the Local Tax Special Cases Restriction Act and managed in an integrated manner with tax exemptions. Finally, in the medium to long term, separate taxation should be applied only to businesses where large-scale landholding is essential and temporary, while incentive systems aimed at inducing taxpayer behavior with significant economic impact should be unified under tax exemptions.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 박지현, "토지분 재산세의 분리과세와 감면제도 비교에 기초한 정책제언" 한국지방세연구원 (57) : 2021

    2 국회 내무위원회, "지방세법개정법률안 심사보고서" 6-10, 1989

    3 마정화, "재산세 분리과세 대상 심사제도 도입에 관한 연구" 한국지방세연구원 2019

    4 박상수, "분리과세토지 타당성평가 세부기준 수립 방안" 한국지방세연구원 2020

    5 박지현, "법인의 토지 보유 실태와 토지세의 정책과제" 한국지방세연구원 2022

    6 이동규, "2017 조세특례 임의 심층평가: 조세특례 일몰제도 운영방안 연구" 기획재정부·한국조세재정연구원 2017

    1 박지현, "토지분 재산세의 분리과세와 감면제도 비교에 기초한 정책제언" 한국지방세연구원 (57) : 2021

    2 국회 내무위원회, "지방세법개정법률안 심사보고서" 6-10, 1989

    3 마정화, "재산세 분리과세 대상 심사제도 도입에 관한 연구" 한국지방세연구원 2019

    4 박상수, "분리과세토지 타당성평가 세부기준 수립 방안" 한국지방세연구원 2020

    5 박지현, "법인의 토지 보유 실태와 토지세의 정책과제" 한국지방세연구원 2022

    6 이동규, "2017 조세특례 임의 심층평가: 조세특례 일몰제도 운영방안 연구" 기획재정부·한국조세재정연구원 2017

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼