부동산거래신고제도의 쟁점 = Controversial Questions of the Report on Transaction of Real Estate

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

1. CONTENTS (1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES It is generally agreed that the Report on transaction of Real Estate is contributed to improve transparency in real estate markets. Already this Report has been evoked much debate during legislation procedure. This Article reviews controversial questions of the Report on transaction of Real Estate (2) RESEARCH METHOD For the research, I have consulted examining reports, legislation and judicial materials rather than textbook. (3) RESEARCH FINDINGS In Korea, a broker who has prepared and delivered a contract document, shall report the real transaction price of such real estate, etc. and other matters prescribed by the Presidental Decree the head of Si/Gun/Gu having jurisdiction over the location of the real estate subject to purchase and sale(in the case of the purchase and sale contract on the title, referring to the real estate subject to such title) within 60days from the date when the contract has been concluded(from BUSINESS AFFAIRS OF LICENSED REAL ESTATE AGENTS AND REPORT OF REAL ESTATE TRANSACTION ACT art. § 27). It is generally agreed that the Report on transaction of Real Estate is contributed to improve transparency in real estate markets. One of the most controversial questions is an unconstituionality issue. But the Constituional Court of Korea has decided constitutionality of this Report. 2. RESULTS Neverthless, it has been argued that this Report System should not be accepted to the brokerage industry. Besides on unconstituionality issue, there are some debates on dualizing system according to the transaction report under art. § 80-2 of the Housing Act, verifying method to a inaccurate price reported etc;, detaching this Report system from the BUSINESS AFFAIRS OF LICENSED REAL ESTATE AGENTS AND REPORT OF REAL ESTATE TRANSACTION ACT, simplifying to report procedure, practical using reported matters, altering of real estate registration, and offering incentive for real estate brokers. I argue that the reason given by the Constitutional Court for constitutional adjunction is questioned in public. I also argue that the difference of the reporting period between real transaction from BUSINESS AFFAIRS OF LICENSED REAL ESTATE AGENTS AND REPORT OF REAL ESTATE TRANSACTION ACT and housing transaction from Housing Act is not appropriate.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 부동산거래신고제도
• Ⅲ.부동산거래신고제도의 주요 쟁점
• Ⅳ. 결론

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 藤井建, "不動産投資市場の發展と新市場政策" (財)日本不動産硏究所 (346) : 2007

2 김철수, "헌법학" 박영사 2008

3 김주환, "평등권심사기준과 방법의 구조화" 박영사 2008

4 이정화, "주택법중 개정법률안" 국회사무처 2004

5 이명섭, "주택거래신고제도 해설" 국토연구원 (268) : 2004

6 국회, "제262회 및 제269회 국회 회의록"

7 이태교, "부동산중개론" 부연사 2006

8 김형남, "기본권론 Ⅱ" 신지서원 2008

9 김형남, "기본권론 Ⅰ" 신지서원 2008

10 김학환, "공인중개사의 업무 및 부동산거래신고에 관한 법률의 개정과 문제점" 대한부동산학회 24 : 2006

11 김학환, "공인중개사의 업무 및 부동산거래신고에 관한 법률 검토" 대한부동산 학회 23 : 2005

12 서진형, "공인중개사법론" 부연사 2008

13 小泉洋一, "憲法の基本" 法律文化社 2008

14 阪本昌成, "憲法 2(基本權クラシック)" 有信堂 2008

15 日本 國土審議會 土地政策分科會, "土地市場の條件整備の推進について(建議)"

16 小澤隆一, "クロ-ズアツプ 憲法" 法律文化社 2008

17 "http://www.joneslanglasalle.com/Pages/GlobalTransparencyIndex.aspx"

18 "http://tochi.mlit.go.jp/kokudosin"

19 JONES LANG LASALLE, "Global Real Estate Transparency Index"