RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      방송의 자유와 통신비밀의 보호 - 안기부 X-파일 사건을 중심으로 = A Study upon Freedom of Broadcasting and Protection of Communication Secret

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76489641

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

        Freedom of broadcasting is comprised in the freedom of speech and press which is the core of basic human rights, namely Grundrecht in german word. However, it has constitutional limits. On the other hand, it brings forward the problem how not to interpretate practical cases unconstitutionally, even though it deviates its limits. It is just when it infringes others" rights, while content of its expression is related to public interests.<BR>  This paper is on one of those cases about "X-File scandal of KCIA(Korea Central Intelligence Agency)" that lower courts have judged differently between the first instance and the second instance. In this case, the accused as journal reporter of broadcasting corporation disclosed to public the recorded conversational contents which had been intercepted by KCIA staffs.<BR>  In this article, it is emphasized that freedom of broadcasting, which is systematic guarantee as well as subjective right, is accomplished as right of knowledge on the basis of principle of popular sovereignty. Furthermore, broadcasting corporation has gained permission as proxy on executing right of knowledge by public trusteeship from the viewpoint of administrative law.<BR>  If so, broadcasting-report infringing communication secret should be estimated as legitimacy. Moreover if conversation content in this case is closely connected with matters threatening popular sovereignty, the legitimacy should be assured.<BR>  Eventually, this case may not be comprehended only as human rights collision. By evaluating legislative system of broadcasting justly, it must reach the proper conclusion in accord with ideal spirit of constitution.
      번역하기

        Freedom of broadcasting is comprised in the freedom of speech and press which is the core of basic human rights, namely Grundrecht in german word. However, it has constitutional limits. On the other hand, it brings forward the problem how ...

        Freedom of broadcasting is comprised in the freedom of speech and press which is the core of basic human rights, namely Grundrecht in german word. However, it has constitutional limits. On the other hand, it brings forward the problem how not to interpretate practical cases unconstitutionally, even though it deviates its limits. It is just when it infringes others" rights, while content of its expression is related to public interests.<BR>  This paper is on one of those cases about "X-File scandal of KCIA(Korea Central Intelligence Agency)" that lower courts have judged differently between the first instance and the second instance. In this case, the accused as journal reporter of broadcasting corporation disclosed to public the recorded conversational contents which had been intercepted by KCIA staffs.<BR>  In this article, it is emphasized that freedom of broadcasting, which is systematic guarantee as well as subjective right, is accomplished as right of knowledge on the basis of principle of popular sovereignty. Furthermore, broadcasting corporation has gained permission as proxy on executing right of knowledge by public trusteeship from the viewpoint of administrative law.<BR>  If so, broadcasting-report infringing communication secret should be estimated as legitimacy. Moreover if conversation content in this case is closely connected with matters threatening popular sovereignty, the legitimacy should be assured.<BR>  Eventually, this case may not be comprehended only as human rights collision. By evaluating legislative system of broadcasting justly, it must reach the proper conclusion in accord with ideal spirit of constitution.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 머리말
        Ⅱ. 하급심 판결의 쟁점분석
        Ⅲ. 사안의 법이론적 재검토
        Ⅳ. 맺음말
        [ABSTRACT]
      • Ⅰ. 머리말
        Ⅱ. 하급심 판결의 쟁점분석
        Ⅲ. 사안의 법이론적 재검토
        Ⅳ. 맺음말
        [ABSTRACT]
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2018-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2017-10-24 학회명변경 한글명 : 법학연구소 -> 법학연구원 KCI등재
      2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-10-10 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> SungKyunKwan Law Review KCI등재
      2008-05-13 학회명변경 한글명 : 비교법연구소 -> 법학연구소
      영문명 : Institute for Comparative Legal Studies -> The Institute of Legal Studies
      KCI등재
      2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.64 0.64 0.71
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.6 0.57 0.849 0.28
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼