A Law and Economics Analysis of Contract Law: Focus on Reliability and Foreseeability

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Consequential damages from reliance can be recovered only if foreseeability is warranted. The doctrine of foreseeability has been built upon the British case of Hadley v. Baxendale, but has been subject to criticisms including the difficulty in applying it in practice. We first attempt to substantiate its efficiency-driven definition especially when there is no relevant contractual stipulation. Our simple theoretic inquiry leads to the proposition that a reliance investment is more (less) likely to be considered foreseeable as its generally-known rate of returns increases (decreases) ceteris paribus. Examining an intriguing case in California reveals that our proposal could provide a workable formula applicable in courts, as an alternative to other rules, for example, making parties to excessively focus on modes of notification. Given that many jurisdictions have increasingly used the foreseeability test, this paper is expected to make a contribution to the literature by helping preserve the optimality of damage measures concerning consequential damages.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Cooter, Robert, "Unity in Tort, Contract, and Property: The Model of Precaution" 73 (73): 1-51, 1985

2 Cartwright, Walter, "Timber Stumpage Values vs. Mill Delivered Prices"

3 Fuller, Lon L., "The Reliance Interest in Contract Damages" 46 (46): 52-96, 1936

4 Schäfer, Hans-Bernd, "The Relevance of Law and Economics for the Development of Judge Made Rules: Examples from German Case-Law" 40 (40): 989-998, 1996

5 Eisenberg, Melvin A., "The Principle of Hadley v. Baxendale" 80 (80): 563-613, 1992

6 Gillette, Clayton P., "Tacit Agreement and Relationship–Specific Investment" 88 (88): 128-169, 2013

7 Ayers, Ian, "Strategic Contractual Inefficiency and the Optimal Choice of Legal Rules" 101 (101): 729-774, 1992

8 Johnston, Jason Scott, "Strategic Bargaining and the Economic Theory of Contract Default Rules" 100 (100): 615-664, 1990

9 Kim, Iljoong, "Rethinking the Economic Characteristics of the Major Contractual Damage Measures" 170 (170): 599-615, 2014

10 Muehlheusser, Gerd, "Regulating Damage Clauses in (Labor) Contracts" 163 (163): 531-551, 2007

11 Bar-Gill, Oren, "Quantifying Foreseeability" 33 (33): 619-649, 2006

12 Wolcher, Louis E., "Price Discrimination and Inefficient Risk Allocation Under the Rule of Hadley v. Baxendale" 9 : 9-31, 1989

13 Easterbrook, Frank H., "Limited Liability and the Corporation" 52 (52): 89-117, 1985

14 Schäfer, Hans-Bernd, "Lehrbuch der ökonomischen Analyse des Zivilrechts" Springer 2012

15 Verkerke, J. Hoult, "Legal Ignorance and Information-Forcing Rules" 56 (56): 899-960, 2015

16 Cooter, Robert, "Law and Economics" Prentice Hall 2011

17 Bebchuk, Lucian A., "Information and the Scope of Liability for Breach of Contract: The Rule of Hadley v. Baxendale" 7 (7): 284-312, 1991

18 Danzig, Richard, "Hadley v. Baxendale: A Study in the Industrialization of the Law" 4 (4): 249-284, 1975

19 Shavell, Steven, "Foundations of Economic Analysis of Law" Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 2004

20 Ayers, Ian, "Filling Gaps in Incomplete Contracts: An Economic Theory of Default Rule" 99 (99): 87-130, 1989

21 Ben-Shahar, Omri, "Causation and Foreseeability, "in Boudewijn Bouckaert and Gerrit De Geest(eds. ), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, "Encyclopedia of Law and Economics Vol. 2" Edward Elgar 644-668, 2000

22 Posner, Richard A., "Economic Analysis of Law" Aspen Publishers 2011

23 van Wijck, Peter, "Contract Law and Economics (in the series of Encyclopedia of Law and Economics Vol. 6" Edward Elgar 225-237, 2011

24 Quillen, Gwyn D., "Contract Damages and Cross-Subsidization" 61 : 1125-1141, 1988

25 Diamond, Thomas A., "Consequential Damages for Commercial Loss: An Alternative to Hadley v. Baxendale" 63 (63): 665-714, 1994

26 Perloff, Jeffrey M., "Breach of Contract and the Foreseeability Doctrine of Hadley v. Baxendale" 10 (10): 39-63, 1981

27 Epstein, Richard, "Beyond Foreseeability: Consequential Damages in the Law of Contract" 18 (18): 105-138, 1989

28 Scott, Robert E., "A Relational Theory of Default Rules for Commercial Contracts" 19 (19): 597-616, 1990