RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      1950∼60년대 해학론의 전개 양상과 그 의미 = A Study on Development and Significance of Theory of Humor in 1950-60’s

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108092416

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The study aims to understand and explore how the theory of humor (諧謔) had become prominent as important literary characteristics in the history of Korean modern literature. As everyone knows, the Korean literature tradition was critically discussed in depth in 1950-60’s and that’s when the new concept, humor had a moment. The purpose of this study is to look at how the theory of humor developed, and its characteristics as suggested in 1950-60’s and find out how the literary set tried to identify Korean literature back then based on discussion.
      The ‘humor’ which came to the forefront from mid-1950’s was considered as a concept word that mediates classical literature and modern literature. Baek Chul strongly believed that the traditional value like ‘humor’ can integrate classical literature with modern literature. Classical literature writers like Jung Byung-wook, Shin Yun-sang attempted to restore traditional characteristics of the humor accordingly. In addition, Kim Sa-yeob and Lee O-young tried to arrange the concept of humor systematically and established a theoretical foothold for the theory of humor which became prominent since 1960’s.
      The ‘humor’ was discussed in two primary aspects after 1960’s. Firstly, the ‘humor’ was considered as significant characteristics that embrace specificity of Korean literature but also universality of the world literature. Such recognition became stronger with some events: joining International PEN in 1954, Nobel Prize in 1968 awarded to Yasunari Kawabata, and the 37th PEN International Congress in Seoul held and titled <Humour in Literature - East and West> in 1970. Secondly, the ‘humor’ was thought as literary talent essentially required to overcome political dynamics in the country and abroad such as anticommunism and cold war. The agenda of the 37th PEN International Congress in Seoul in which many eastern countries engaged in was set as the ‘humor’ and it explains why many argued that the polarized world can turn into ‘the world of harmony’ through the humor.
      As explained above, the concept of the humor in 1950-60’s was used widely used as a mechanism to settle problems arising from discontinuity between classical and modern literature, distance between specificity of Korean literature and universality of the world literature, and also political dynamics in the country and abroad such as anticommunism and cold war.
      번역하기

      The study aims to understand and explore how the theory of humor (諧謔) had become prominent as important literary characteristics in the history of Korean modern literature. As everyone knows, the Korean literature tradition was critically discusse...

      The study aims to understand and explore how the theory of humor (諧謔) had become prominent as important literary characteristics in the history of Korean modern literature. As everyone knows, the Korean literature tradition was critically discussed in depth in 1950-60’s and that’s when the new concept, humor had a moment. The purpose of this study is to look at how the theory of humor developed, and its characteristics as suggested in 1950-60’s and find out how the literary set tried to identify Korean literature back then based on discussion.
      The ‘humor’ which came to the forefront from mid-1950’s was considered as a concept word that mediates classical literature and modern literature. Baek Chul strongly believed that the traditional value like ‘humor’ can integrate classical literature with modern literature. Classical literature writers like Jung Byung-wook, Shin Yun-sang attempted to restore traditional characteristics of the humor accordingly. In addition, Kim Sa-yeob and Lee O-young tried to arrange the concept of humor systematically and established a theoretical foothold for the theory of humor which became prominent since 1960’s.
      The ‘humor’ was discussed in two primary aspects after 1960’s. Firstly, the ‘humor’ was considered as significant characteristics that embrace specificity of Korean literature but also universality of the world literature. Such recognition became stronger with some events: joining International PEN in 1954, Nobel Prize in 1968 awarded to Yasunari Kawabata, and the 37th PEN International Congress in Seoul held and titled <Humour in Literature - East and West> in 1970. Secondly, the ‘humor’ was thought as literary talent essentially required to overcome political dynamics in the country and abroad such as anticommunism and cold war. The agenda of the 37th PEN International Congress in Seoul in which many eastern countries engaged in was set as the ‘humor’ and it explains why many argued that the polarized world can turn into ‘the world of harmony’ through the humor.
      As explained above, the concept of the humor in 1950-60’s was used widely used as a mechanism to settle problems arising from discontinuity between classical and modern literature, distance between specificity of Korean literature and universality of the world literature, and also political dynamics in the country and abroad such as anticommunism and cold war.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "현대문학"

      2 신윤상, "한국의 유모어-시가의 해학 연구" 영진사 1963

      3 한림과학원, "한국근대신어사전" 선인 2010

      4 박헌호, "카프해산 전후기의 풍자소설론과 풍자소설" 반교어문학회 3 : 1991

      5 "중앙일보"

      6 "조선일보"

      7 박연희, "제 29차 도쿄 국제펜대회(1957)와 냉전문화사적 의미와 지평" 한국학연구소 (49) : 189-222, 2018

      8 김사엽, "웃음과 해학의 본질-국문학의 특질 구명을 위하여" 한국어문학회 2 : 1958

      9 모윤숙, "영운 모윤숙 문학전집 6-回想의 창가에서" 성한출판 1986

      10 백 철, "세계 작가회의의 수확 : 제37차 PEN 회의를 마치고" 국회사무처 104 : 1970

      1 "현대문학"

      2 신윤상, "한국의 유모어-시가의 해학 연구" 영진사 1963

      3 한림과학원, "한국근대신어사전" 선인 2010

      4 박헌호, "카프해산 전후기의 풍자소설론과 풍자소설" 반교어문학회 3 : 1991

      5 "중앙일보"

      6 "조선일보"

      7 박연희, "제 29차 도쿄 국제펜대회(1957)와 냉전문화사적 의미와 지평" 한국학연구소 (49) : 189-222, 2018

      8 김사엽, "웃음과 해학의 본질-국문학의 특질 구명을 위하여" 한국어문학회 2 : 1958

      9 모윤숙, "영운 모윤숙 문학전집 6-回想의 창가에서" 성한출판 1986

      10 백 철, "세계 작가회의의 수확 : 제37차 PEN 회의를 마치고" 국회사무처 104 : 1970

      11 "사상계"

      12 서영채, "민족,주체,전통; 1950~60년대 전통논의의 의미" 민족문학사연구소 (34) : 10-48, 2007

      13 "매일신보"

      14 "매일경제"

      15 왕캉닝, "린위탕과 한국-냉전기 중국 문화·지식의 초국가적 이동과 교류를 중심으로" 고려대 2021

      16 "동아일보"

      17 국제 P.E.N. 한국본부, "동서문학의 해학: 제37차 세계작가대회 회의록"

      18 백철, "국문학전사" 신구문화사 1957

      19 정병욱, "국문학산고" 신구문화사 1959

      20 이도연, "국문학 연구에 있어 희극성의 ‘개념’과 ‘범주’ 설정을 위한 예비적 시론" 인문학연구원 (65) : 449-472, 2011

      21 "경향신문"

      22 Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht, "Shall we continue to write histories of literature?" The Johns Hopkins University Press 39 (39): 2008

      23 이주라, "1930년대 김규택의 유모어소설과 웃음의 새로운 가능성" 민족어문학회 (74) : 99-131, 2015

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.54 0.54 0.54
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.51 0.5 0.879 0.19
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼