RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    미국 주요 대학의 학사지도 사례 분석을 통한 전공자율선택제 학사지도교수의 역할과 개선방안 탐색 = Exploring the Role of Academic Advisor and Institutional Improvement Strategies : Insights from U.S. University Practices

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110106977

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study aimed to analyze the operational status of academic advising at major U.S.
    universities, identify shared characteristics, and based on these findings, propose the roles of advising faculty and institutional improvement strategies for the successful implementation of Korea’s autonomous major selection system in Korean universities. The specific objectives of the study were as follows: First, it examines academic advising practices at major U.S. universities to identify shared characteristics. Second, drawing on implications from the U.S. cases, it explores the roles of advising faculty and proposes institutional improvement strategies under Korea’s autonomous major selection system.
    To achieve these objectives, this study conducted a comparative analysis of materials from major U.S. universities. The results identified five shared characteristics: a clearly defined responsibility structure, regular and structured consultations, individualized advising from a developmental perspective, a multi-layered support system, and an integrated career support system. In addition, advising faculty members perform comprehensive roles as educational consultants, major exploration guides, career development facilitators, student advocates, and mentors. Based on these implications, the study proposes the following strategies for Korean universities to implement an autonomous major selection system: (1) clarification and professional development of the advising faculty role; (2) implementation of major exploration and in-depth consultation programs; and (3) establishment of an integrated consultation system.
    번역하기

    This study aimed to analyze the operational status of academic advising at major U.S. universities, identify shared characteristics, and based on these findings, propose the roles of advising faculty and institutional improvement strategies for the su...

    This study aimed to analyze the operational status of academic advising at major U.S.
    universities, identify shared characteristics, and based on these findings, propose the roles of advising faculty and institutional improvement strategies for the successful implementation of Korea’s autonomous major selection system in Korean universities. The specific objectives of the study were as follows: First, it examines academic advising practices at major U.S. universities to identify shared characteristics. Second, drawing on implications from the U.S. cases, it explores the roles of advising faculty and proposes institutional improvement strategies under Korea’s autonomous major selection system.
    To achieve these objectives, this study conducted a comparative analysis of materials from major U.S. universities. The results identified five shared characteristics: a clearly defined responsibility structure, regular and structured consultations, individualized advising from a developmental perspective, a multi-layered support system, and an integrated career support system. In addition, advising faculty members perform comprehensive roles as educational consultants, major exploration guides, career development facilitators, student advocates, and mentors. Based on these implications, the study proposes the following strategies for Korean universities to implement an autonomous major selection system: (1) clarification and professional development of the advising faculty role; (2) implementation of major exploration and in-depth consultation programs; and (3) establishment of an integrated consultation system.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼