RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      유방 관상피내암에서 초음파와 MRI의 종양 크기 예측 정확도 비교 = Comparative Accuracy of Preoperative Tumor Size Assessment on Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107955033

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of preoperative breast tumor size measured by ultrasonography (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Methods: Medical records of 74 patients postoperatively diagnosed with DCIS were retrospectively analyzed. Tumor size measurements obtained using the two imaging modalities were compared for accuracy with those obtained during the final pathologic examination. Patients with only microcalcification on imaging were excluded. Results: For all patients, Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) of MRI was 0.725, which was more accurate than 0.670 of US. In subgroup analysis, CCC of US was 0.757, more accurate than 0.697 of MRI in premenopausal DCIS patients. Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) was the only risk factor deteriorating the accuracy of US and MRI examinations. Moderate and marked BPE was associated with the inaccurate tumor size estimations in both US and MRI (odds ratio [OR]:2.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.12−3.52, p=0.001 in US, OR:8.16, 95% CI=1.17−15.2, p=0.031 in MRI). Conclusion: MRI was more accurate for measuring tumor size in patients with DCIS. Moderate and marked BPE was a risk factor that prevented accurate measurement of preoperative tumor size. In premenopausal patients, US would help measure tumor size accurately.
      번역하기

      Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of preoperative breast tumor size measured by ultrasonography (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Methods: Medical records of 74 pat...

      Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of preoperative breast tumor size measured by ultrasonography (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Methods: Medical records of 74 patients postoperatively diagnosed with DCIS were retrospectively analyzed. Tumor size measurements obtained using the two imaging modalities were compared for accuracy with those obtained during the final pathologic examination. Patients with only microcalcification on imaging were excluded. Results: For all patients, Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) of MRI was 0.725, which was more accurate than 0.670 of US. In subgroup analysis, CCC of US was 0.757, more accurate than 0.697 of MRI in premenopausal DCIS patients. Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) was the only risk factor deteriorating the accuracy of US and MRI examinations. Moderate and marked BPE was associated with the inaccurate tumor size estimations in both US and MRI (odds ratio [OR]:2.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.12−3.52, p=0.001 in US, OR:8.16, 95% CI=1.17−15.2, p=0.031 in MRI). Conclusion: MRI was more accurate for measuring tumor size in patients with DCIS. Moderate and marked BPE was a risk factor that prevented accurate measurement of preoperative tumor size. In premenopausal patients, US would help measure tumor size accurately.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김은혁, "조기 유방암에서 수술 전 유방초음파 및 유방 자기공명영상검사와 수술 후 병리학적 종양 크기에 대한 비교 연구" 한국유방암학회 8 (8): 19-24, 2020

      2 Breen N, "Update on mammography trends : comparisons of rates in 2000, 2005, and 2008" 117 : 2209-2218, 2011

      3 "The Asia-Pacific perspective: redefining obesity and its treatment" World Health Organization

      4 Yeh E, "Prospective comparison of mammography, sonography, and MRI in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for palpable breast cancer" 184 : 868-877, 2005

      5 Fitzgibbons PL, "Prognostic factors in breast cancer. College of American Pathologists consensus statement 1999" 124 : 966-978, 2000

      6 Musaed Rayzah, "Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Assessment of the Size of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ" 한국유방암학회 4 (4): 77-84, 2016

      7 Houvenaeghel G, "Positive or close margins: reoperation rate and second conservative resection or total mastectomy?" 11 : 2507-2516, 2019

      8 Gruber IV, "Measurement of tumour size with mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance imaging as compared to histological tumour size in primary breast cancer" 13 : 328-, 2013

      9 Byrne C, "Mammographic features and breast cancer risk : effects with time, age, and menopause status" 87 : 1622-1629, 1995

      10 Hata T, "Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of breast cancer : a comparative study with mammography and ultrasonography" 198 : 190-197, 2004

      1 김은혁, "조기 유방암에서 수술 전 유방초음파 및 유방 자기공명영상검사와 수술 후 병리학적 종양 크기에 대한 비교 연구" 한국유방암학회 8 (8): 19-24, 2020

      2 Breen N, "Update on mammography trends : comparisons of rates in 2000, 2005, and 2008" 117 : 2209-2218, 2011

      3 "The Asia-Pacific perspective: redefining obesity and its treatment" World Health Organization

      4 Yeh E, "Prospective comparison of mammography, sonography, and MRI in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for palpable breast cancer" 184 : 868-877, 2005

      5 Fitzgibbons PL, "Prognostic factors in breast cancer. College of American Pathologists consensus statement 1999" 124 : 966-978, 2000

      6 Musaed Rayzah, "Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Assessment of the Size of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ" 한국유방암학회 4 (4): 77-84, 2016

      7 Houvenaeghel G, "Positive or close margins: reoperation rate and second conservative resection or total mastectomy?" 11 : 2507-2516, 2019

      8 Gruber IV, "Measurement of tumour size with mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance imaging as compared to histological tumour size in primary breast cancer" 13 : 328-, 2013

      9 Byrne C, "Mammographic features and breast cancer risk : effects with time, age, and menopause status" 87 : 1622-1629, 1995

      10 Hata T, "Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of breast cancer : a comparative study with mammography and ultrasonography" 198 : 190-197, 2004

      11 Vincent-Salomon A, "Integrated genomic and transcriptomic analysis of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast" 14 : 1956-1965, 2008

      12 "Ductal carcinoma in situ: terminology, classification, and natural history" Oxford academic

      13 Behjatnia B, "Does size matter? Comparison study between MRI, gross, and microscopic tumor sizes in breast cancer in lumpectomy specimens" 3 : 303-309, 2010

      14 Lai HW, "Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging with sonography in the prediction of breast cancer tumor size : a concordance analysis with histopathologically determined tumor size" 22 : 3816-3823, 2015

      15 Leddy R, "Comparative accuracy of preoperative tumor size assessment on mammography, sonography, and MRI: is the accuracy affected by breast density or cancer subtype?" 44 : 17-25, 2016

      16 Min-Ji Park, "Clinical Significance of Non-Mass-Like Enhancement of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Cancer Considering Breast-Conserving Surgery" 한국유방암학회 6 (6): 20-24, 2018

      17 Ramirez SI, "Breast cancer tumor size assessment with mammography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging at a community based multidisciplinary breast center" 78 : 440-446, 2012

      18 DeSantis CE, "Breast cancer statistics, 2019" 69 : 438-451, 2019

      19 강상율, "Breast Cancer Statistics in Korea, 2018" 한국유방암학회 24 (24): 123-137, 2021

      20 강상율, "Breast Cancer Statistics in Korea in 2017: Data from a Breast Cancer Registry" 한국유방암학회 23 (23): 115-128, 2020

      21 DeMartini WB, "Background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI : impact on diagnostic performance" 198 : W373-80, 2012

      22 Liao GJ, "Background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI : a comprehensive review" 51 : 43-61, 2020

      23 Uematsu T, "Background enhancement of mammary glandular tissue on breast dynamic MRI : imaging features and effect on assessment of breast cancer extent" 19 : 259-265, 2012

      24 Wadsten C, "A validation of DCIS registration in a population-based breast cancer quality register and a study of treatment and prognosis for DCIS during 20 years : two decades of DCIS in Sweden" 66 : 1338-1343, 2016

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼