RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Clinical Impact of Tumor Regression Grade after Preoperative Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Subset Analyses in Lymph Node Negative Patients

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104749014

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background: We investigated the prognostic significance of tumor regression grade (TRG) after preoperative chemoradiation therapy (preop-CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer especially in the patients without lymph node metastasis.
      Methods: One-hundred seventy-eight patients who had cT3/4 tumors were given 5,040 cGy preoperative radiation with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin chemotherapy. A total mesorectal excision was performed 4-6 weeks after preop-CRT. TRG was defined as follows: grade 1 as no cancer cells remaining; grade 2 as cancer cells outgrown by fibrosis; grade 3 as a minimal presence or absence of regression. The prognostic significance of TRG in comparison with histopathologic staging was analyzed.
      Results: Seventeen patients (9.6%) showed TRG1. TRG was found to be significantly associated with cancer-specific survival (CSS; P = 0.001) and local recurrence (P = 0.039) in the univariate study, but not in the multivariate analysis. The ypN stage was the strongest prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis. Subgroup analysis revealed TRG to be an independent prognostic factor for the CSS of ypN0 patients (P = 0.031). TRG had a stronger impact on the CSS of ypN (-) patients (P = 0.002) than on that of ypN (+) patients (P = 0.521). In ypT2N0 and ypT3N0, CSS was better for TRG2 than for TRG3 (P = 0.041, P = 0.048), and in ypN (-) and TRG2 tumors, CSS was better for ypT1-2 than for ypT3-4 (P = 0.034).
      Conclusion: TRG was found to be the strongest prognostic factor in patients without lymph node metastasis (ypN0), and different survival was observed according to TRG among patients with a specific histopathologic stage. Thus, TRG may provide an accurate prediction of prognosis and may be used for f tailoring treatment for patients without lymph node metastasis.
      번역하기

      Background: We investigated the prognostic significance of tumor regression grade (TRG) after preoperative chemoradiation therapy (preop-CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer especially in the patients without lymph node metastasis. Methods: One-hun...

      Background: We investigated the prognostic significance of tumor regression grade (TRG) after preoperative chemoradiation therapy (preop-CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer especially in the patients without lymph node metastasis.
      Methods: One-hundred seventy-eight patients who had cT3/4 tumors were given 5,040 cGy preoperative radiation with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin chemotherapy. A total mesorectal excision was performed 4-6 weeks after preop-CRT. TRG was defined as follows: grade 1 as no cancer cells remaining; grade 2 as cancer cells outgrown by fibrosis; grade 3 as a minimal presence or absence of regression. The prognostic significance of TRG in comparison with histopathologic staging was analyzed.
      Results: Seventeen patients (9.6%) showed TRG1. TRG was found to be significantly associated with cancer-specific survival (CSS; P = 0.001) and local recurrence (P = 0.039) in the univariate study, but not in the multivariate analysis. The ypN stage was the strongest prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis. Subgroup analysis revealed TRG to be an independent prognostic factor for the CSS of ypN0 patients (P = 0.031). TRG had a stronger impact on the CSS of ypN (-) patients (P = 0.002) than on that of ypN (+) patients (P = 0.521). In ypT2N0 and ypT3N0, CSS was better for TRG2 than for TRG3 (P = 0.041, P = 0.048), and in ypN (-) and TRG2 tumors, CSS was better for ypT1-2 than for ypT3-4 (P = 0.034).
      Conclusion: TRG was found to be the strongest prognostic factor in patients without lymph node metastasis (ypN0), and different survival was observed according to TRG among patients with a specific histopathologic stage. Thus, TRG may provide an accurate prediction of prognosis and may be used for f tailoring treatment for patients without lymph node metastasis.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Caricato M, "Tumor regression in mesorectal lymphnodes after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer" 33 : 724-728, 2007

      2 Janjan NA, "Tumor downstaging and sphincter preservation with preoperative chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience" 44 : 1027-1038, 1999

      3 Vecchio FM, "The relationship of pathologic tumor regression grade (TRG) and outcomes after preoperative therapy in rectal cancer" 62 : 752-760, 2005

      4 Willett CG, "Rectal cancer: the influence of tumor proliferation on response to preoperative irradiation" 32 : 57-61, 1995

      5 Wheeler JM, "Quantification of histologic regression of rectal cancer after irradiation: a proposal for a modified staging system" 45 : 1051-1056, 2002

      6 Rodel C, "Prognostic significance of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer" 23 : 8688-8696, 2005

      7 Janjan NA, "Prognostic implications of response to preoperative infusional chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer" 51 : 153-160, 1999

      8 Sauer R, "Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer" 351 : 1731-1740, 2004

      9 Kim NK, "Preoperative staging of rectal cancer with MRI: accuracy and clinical usefulness" 7 : 732-737, 2000

      10 Valentini V, "Preoperative chemoradiation for extraperitoneal T3 rectal cancer: acute toxicity, tumor response, and sphincter preservation" 40 : 1067-1075, 1998

      1 Caricato M, "Tumor regression in mesorectal lymphnodes after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer" 33 : 724-728, 2007

      2 Janjan NA, "Tumor downstaging and sphincter preservation with preoperative chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience" 44 : 1027-1038, 1999

      3 Vecchio FM, "The relationship of pathologic tumor regression grade (TRG) and outcomes after preoperative therapy in rectal cancer" 62 : 752-760, 2005

      4 Willett CG, "Rectal cancer: the influence of tumor proliferation on response to preoperative irradiation" 32 : 57-61, 1995

      5 Wheeler JM, "Quantification of histologic regression of rectal cancer after irradiation: a proposal for a modified staging system" 45 : 1051-1056, 2002

      6 Rodel C, "Prognostic significance of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer" 23 : 8688-8696, 2005

      7 Janjan NA, "Prognostic implications of response to preoperative infusional chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer" 51 : 153-160, 1999

      8 Sauer R, "Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer" 351 : 1731-1740, 2004

      9 Kim NK, "Preoperative staging of rectal cancer with MRI: accuracy and clinical usefulness" 7 : 732-737, 2000

      10 Valentini V, "Preoperative chemoradiation for extraperitoneal T3 rectal cancer: acute toxicity, tumor response, and sphincter preservation" 40 : 1067-1075, 1998

      11 Ryan R, "Pathological response following long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer" 47 : 141-146, 2005

      12 Dworak O, "Pathological features of rectal cancer after preoperative radiochemotherapy" 12 : 19-23, 1997

      13 Mandard AM, "Pathologic assessment of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy of esophageal carcinoma: clinicopathologic correlations" 73 : 2680-2686, 1994

      14 "Oncologic outcomes after neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by curative resection with tumor-specific mesorectal excision for fixed locally advanced rectal cancer: Impact of postirradiated pathologic downstaging on local recurrence and survival" 244 (244): 1024-1030, 2006

      15 Read TE, "Neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: histologic response of the primary tumor predicts nodal status" 47 : 825-831, 2004

      16 Onaitis MW, "Neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer: analysis of clinical outcomes from a 13-year institutional experience" 233 : 778-785, 2001

      17 Glehen O, "Lyons Oncology Group. Long-term results of the Lyons R90-01 randomized trial of preoperative radiotherapy with delayed surgery and its effect on sphincter-saving surgery in rectal cancer" 90 : 996-998, 2003

      18 Ruo L, "Long-term prognostic significance of extent of rectal cancer response to preoperative radiation and chemotherapy" 236 : 75-81, 2002

      19 Kim DW, "Is T classification still correlated with lymph node status after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer" 106 : 1694-1700, 2006

      20 Klautke G, "Intensified concurrent chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer" 92 : 1215-1220, 2005

      21 Francois Y, "Influence of the interval between preoperative radiation therapy and surgery on downstaging and on the rate of sphincter- sparing surgery for rectal cancer: the Lyon R90-01 randomized trial" 17 : 2396-, 1999

      22 Gerard JP, "Improved sphincter preservation in low rectal cancer with high-dose preoperative radiotherapy: the lyon R96-02 randomized trial" 22 : 2404-2409, 2004

      23 Janjan NA, "Improved overall survival among responders to preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer" 24 : 107-112, 2001

      24 Bouzourene H, "Importance of tumor regression assessment in predicting the outcome in patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma who are treated with preoperative radiotherapy" 94 : 1121-1130, 2002

      25 Valentini V, "Does downstaging predict improved outcome after preoperative chemoradiation for extraperitoneal locally advanced rectal cancer? A long-term analysis of 165 patients" 53 : 664-674, 2002

      26 Bosset JF, "Chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer" 355 : 1114-1123, 2006

      27 De Paoli A, "Capecitabine in combination with preoperative radiation therapy in locally advanced, resectable, rectal cancer: a multicentric phase II study" 17 : 246-251, 2006

      28 Greene FL, "AJCC cancer staging manual" Springer- Verlag 2002

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2013-03-13 학술지명변경 한글명 : Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctolgy -> Annals of Coloproctolgy
      외국어명 : Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctolgy -> Annals of Coloproctolgy
      KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-11-26 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한대장항문학회지 -> Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctolgy KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-05-30 학술지등록 한글명 : 대한대장항문학회지
      외국어명 : 미등록
      KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.09 0.09 0.08
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.07 0.06 0.312 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼