최근 한국상고사 논쟁의 본질과 그 대응 = Controversy over Ancient Korean History, and How we should respond

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Recently, some quasi historians have grouped and argued that Gojoseon and Nakrang-gun were positioned in the Manju area and not inside the Korean peninsula. Debates over the matter span out of control, and eventually became a controversy. Their arguments are old, as those theories had already been thrown in the 1980s, and then resurfaced nowadays, virtually unchanged. Their denouncement and attacks upon legitimate previous studies have finally crossed the line, and should no longer be tolerated.
They criticise previous studies for being supposedly ‘similar’ to recent Chinese studies or ‘colonial history’ that had been developed by the Japanese over a century ago. But they do so without presenting sufficient analysis or objective evaluation. It is most troubling that these quasi historians’ arguments, and the possibility that their studies might be used by whoever in political power, could irrevocably compromise the integrity of future historical studies, which would require careful interpretation of historical texts.
Historians and researchers can no longer afford to sit back and watch. They should rise and aid in the education of the public. Presented in this article is a critical analysis of quasi historical studies, in which the so-called ‘bases’ of their arguments are carefully examined. This is meant as a comprehensive review of the Korean ancient history controversy which would hopefully remind all of us that these studies, and sometimes other studies in the past as well, oftentimes feature highly politicized chauvinist perspectives, especially when dealing with issues such as territorial boundaries and centers, and do not bother to determine how people actually lived during those times.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 머리말
• 1. 유사역사학의 등장과 상고사 논쟁의 전개
• 2. 유사역사학의 환상적 상고사 인식이 갖는 문제점
• 맺음말
• 참고문헌
• 〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 遼寧省博物館, "遼河文明展"

2 윤내현, "현행 국사교과서의 문제점과 개편 방향-상고사를 중심으로-" (3) : 2000

3 이덕일, "한국사, 그들이 숨긴 4대 진실" 역사의 아침 2012

4 조인성, "한국사 시민강좌" 일조각 1997

5 한국정신문화연구원, "한국 상고사의 제문제" 1987

6 육군본부, "통일과 웅비를 향한 겨레의 역사"

7 신채호, "조선사연구초(朝鮮史硏究草)" 1924

8 송호정, "재야사학자들의 환상적인 고대사 인식과 그 문제점" 12 : 2005

9 이문영, "우리시대 단군의 의미는?" 한겨레 21 2013

10 최재인, "우리 역사왜곡을 어떻게 할 것인가?"

11 이덕일, "우리 안의 식민사관" 만권당 2014

12 김병모, "올바른 상고사 복원을 위한 민족 대심포지움 발표문"

13 김한종, "역사교육으로 읽는 한국현대사" 책과함께 2013

14 윤용구, "새로 발견된 樂浪木簡－樂浪郡 初元四年 縣別戶口簿－" 한국고대사학회 (46) : 241-264, 2007

15 이덕일, "매국의 역사학, 어디까지 왔나" 만권당 2015

16 우실하, "동북공정 넘어 요하문명론" 소나무 2007

17 박광용, "대단군 민족주의의 전개와 양면성" (겨울) : 1992

18 윤종영, "국사 교과서 파동" 혜안 1999

19 이덕일, "고조선은 대륙의 지배자였다" 역사의 아침 2006

20 리지린, "고조선연구" 과학원출판사 1963

21 윤내현, "고조선 연구" 一志社 1994

22 김상호, "고조선 문제를 둘러싼 논쟁과 금후의 과제" (가을) : 1988

23 윤용구, "平壤出土<樂浪郡初元四年縣別戶口簿>硏究" 3 : 2009

24 윤용구, "1920~1930년대 한사군 위치 논쟁"