정인보와 동아일보 - 조선학을 둘러싼 접점 = Study on Jeong, inbo and Dong-A Ilbo - Collusion around 'Joseonhak'

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This research aimed at analyzing the theory of movement of Jeong, inbo and Dong-A Ilbo from 1920s to early and mid 1930, checking the agreement between the two, and investigating the development of Jeong, inbo's 'Joseonhak'(Joseon studies) movement therein. It was determined that Dong-A Ilbo and Jeong, inbo formed a steady bond of sympathy on national movement. That could be found in the fact that both of them asserted the development of independent national culture as an urgent problem of national movement, which took Joseon as the unit. In the point that the selected urgent problem was the development of independent national culture based on the same ideological foundation, nationalism, agreement of the two existed. Therefore, Jeong, inbo, who began to make relationship with Dong-A Ilbo from 1924, at the latest, clarified his political opinion through Dong-A Ilbo, as well, utilized it as the major stage of developing Joseonhak movement of 1930s.

Jeong, inbo's study on Joseonhak was progressed by being interconnected with national culture enhancement planning of Dong-A Ilbo. Jeong, inbo serially published a bibliographical introduction of a classical work of Joseon in Dong-A Ilbo, and asserted historic place preservation such as Admiral Yi Sun-sin enhancement project, etc. by receiving Song, jinwoo's advice. Also, he serially published "Yangmyunghak-yeonron" in Dong-A Ilbo, one of his major achievement in 66 installments. In Dasan commemoration business, the opportunity of regular Joseon studies movement, Jeong, inbo published editorial and thesis in Dong-A Ilbo and conducted commemorative lecture. 'Eol-sagwan'(historical view by national spirit), peak of Jeong, inbo's Joseon studies research, was also published in Dong-A Ilbo.

This way, Jeong, inbo's Joseon studies research was developed through the medium, Dong-A Ilbo. This proved that his Joseonhak movement was developed by being mutually closely interlocked with cultural movement theory of Dong-A Ilbo, accordingly, it is not valid to divide the two into compromise and non-compromise, or left/right nationalism.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 류시현, "최남선 연구" 역사비평사 2009

2 "조선중앙일보"

3 "조선일보"

4 정인보, "조선사연구" 우리역사연구재단 2012

5 마이클 로빈슨, "일제하 문화적 민족주의" 나남 1990

6 鄭寅普, "양명학연론" 한국국학진흥원 2005

7 "신조선"

8 류준필, "식민지 아카데미즘의 '조선문학사' 인식과 그 지정학적 함의: 자국(문)학 형성의 맥락에서" 한국학연구소 (32) : 93-124, 2014

9 "삼천리"

10 동아일보80년사편찬위원회, "민족과 더불어 80년" 동아일보사 2000

11 "동아일보"

12 김용직, "김태준 평전 : 지성과 역사적 상황" 일지사 2007

13 김태준, "金台俊全集" 보고사 1998

14 鄭寅普, "蒼園文錄" 태학사 2006

15 鄭寅普, "蒼園 鄭寅普全集" 연세대학교 출판부 1983

16 문일평, "湖岩 文一平 全集" 民俗苑 1994

17 현상윤, "幾堂 玄相允 全集" 나남 2008

18 신주백, "‘조선학운동’에 관한 연구동향과 새로운 시론적 탐색" 한국민족운동사학회 (67) : 167-202, 2011

19 류승완, "1920~1930년대 조선학의 분화에 대한 일 고찰" 숭실사학회 31 (31): 207-242, 2013

20 조성산, "18세기 후반~19세기 전반 ‘朝鮮學’ 형성의 전제와 가능성" 국학연구원 (148) : 179-240, 2009