Frictional property comparisons of conventional and self-ligating lingual brackets according to tooth displacement during initial leveling and alignment|RISS 상세보기

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Objective: We evaluated the effects of tooth displacement on frictional force when conventional ligating lingual brackets (CL-LBs), CL-LBs with a narrow bracket width, and self-ligating lingual brackets (SL-LBs) were used with initial leveling and alignment wires. Methods: CL-LBs (7th Generation), CLLBs with a narrow bracket width (STb), and SL-LBs (In-Ovation L) were tested under three tooth displacement conditions: no displacement (control); a 2-mm palatal displacement (PD) of the maxillary right lateral incisor (MXLI); and a 2-mm gingival displacement (GD) of the maxillary right canine (MXC) (nine groups, n = 7 per group). A stereolithographic typodont system and artificial saliva were used. Static and kinetic frictional forces (SFF and KFF, respectively) were measured while drawing a 0.013-inch copper-nickel-titanium archwire through brackets at 0.5 mm/min for 5 minutes at 36.5℃. Results: The In-Ovation L exhibited lower SFF under control conditions and lower KFF under all displacement conditions than the 7th Generation and STb (all p < 0.001). No significant difference in SFF existed between the In-Ovation L and STb for a 2-mm GD of the MXC and 2-mm PD of the MXLI. A 2-mm GD of the MXC produced higher SFF and KFF than a 2-mm PD of the MXLI in all brackets (all p < 0.001). Conclusions: CLLBs with narrow bracket widths exhibited higher KFF than SL-LBs under tooth displacement conditions. CL-LBs and ligation methods should be developed to produce SFF and KFF as low as those in SL-LBs during the initial and leveling stage.

번역하기

목차 (Table of Contents)

INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION

INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Lombardo L, "Wire load-deflection characteristics relative to different types of brackets" 9 : 120-139, 2011

2 Khattab TZ, "Speech performance and oral impairments with lingual and labial orthodontic appliances in the first stage of fixed treatment" 83 : 519-526, 2013

3 Kusy RP, "Resistance to sliding of orthodontic appliances in the dry and wet states:influence of archwire alloy, interbracket distance, and bracket engagement" 52 : 797-811, 2000

4 Moran KI, "Relative wire stiffness due to lingual versus labial interbracket distance" 92 : 24-32, 1987

5 Fujita K, "New orthodontic treatment with lingual bracket mushroom arch wire appliance" 76 : 657-675, 1979

6 Kyung Hee Park, "New classification of lingual arch form in normal occlusion using three dimensional virtual models" 대한치과교정학회 45 (45): 74-81, 2015

7 Mevlut Celikoglu, "Mandibular changes during initial alignment with SmartClip self-ligating and conventional brackets: A single-center prospective randomized controlled clinical trial" 대한치과교정학회 45 (45): 89-94, 2015

8 Creekmore T, "Lingual orthodontics--its renaissance" 96 : 120-137, 1989

9 Takemoto K, "Lingual orthodontics extraction therapy" 4 : 2-21, 1995

10 Smith JR, "Keys to success in lingual therapy. Part 1" 20 : 252-261, 1986