Comparison of transverse dental changes induced by the palatally applied Frog appliance and buccally applied Karad’s integrated distalizing system

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Objective: To compare the transverse dental changes induced by the palatally applied Frog appliance and buccally applied Karad’s integrated distalizing system(KIDS). Methods: We evaluated the pre- and post distalization orthodontic models of 39 patients, including 19 treated using the Frog appliance, which is palatally positioned (Frog group), and 20 treated using KIDS, which is buccally positioned (KIDS group). Changes in intermolar and interpremolar distances and the amount of maxillary premolar and molar rotation were evaluated on model photocopies. Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for statistical evaluations. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Significant distopalatal rotation of premolars and distobuccal rotation of molars were observed in Frog group (p < 0.05), while significant distopalatal rotation of molars (p < 0.05), with no significant changes in premolars, was observed in KIDS group. The amount of second premolar and first molar rotation was significantly different between the two groups (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, expansion in the region of the first molars and second premolars was significantly greater in KIDS group than in Frog group (p < 0.001 for both). Conclusions: Our results suggest that the type and amount of first molar rotation and expansion vary with the design of the distalization appliance used.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• INTRODUCTION
• MATERIALS AND METHODS
• RESULTS
• DISCUSSION
• CONCLUSION
• REFERENCES

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Kinzinger GS, "Treatment effects of intraoral appliances with conventional anchorage designs for non-compliance maxillary molar distalization: a literature review" 30 : 558-571, 2008

2 Ludwig B, "The skeletal frog appliance for maxillary molar distalization" 45 : 77-84, 2011

3 Mehmet Bayram, "The frog appliance for upper molar distalization: a case report" 대한치과교정학회 40 (40): 50-60, 2010

4 Braun S, "The effect of maxillary first molar derotation on arch length" 112 : 538-544, 1997

5 Dahlberg G, "Statistical methods for medical and biological students" Interscience Publications 1940

6 Mariani L, "Skeletal versus conventional intraoral anchorage for the treatment of class II malocclusion: dentoalveolar and skeletal effects" 15 : 43-, 2014

7 Fuziy A, "Sagittal, vertical, and transverse changes consequent to maxillary molar distalization with the pendulum appliance" 130 : 502-510, 2006

8 Champagne M, "Reliability of measurements from photocopies of study models" 26 : 648-650, 1992

9 Papadopoulos MA, "Orthodontic treatment of the Class II noncompliant patient. Current principles and techniques" Mosby Elsevier 2006

10 Cetlin NM, "Nonextraction treatment" 17 : 396-413, 1983

11 Fontana M, "Noncompliance maxillary molar distalizing appliances:an overview of the last decade" 13 : 173-184, 2012

12 Papadopoulos MA, "Noncompliance maxillary molar distalization with the first class appliance: a randomized controlled trial" 137 : 586. e1-586. e13, 2010

13 Erverdi N, "Nickeltitanium coil springs and repelling magnets: a comparison of two different intra-oral molar distalization techniques" 24 : 47-53, 1997

14 Acar AG, "Molar distalization with a pendulum appliance K-loop combination" 32 : 459-465, 2010

15 Kinzinger GS, "Molar distalization with a modified pendulum appliance--in vitro analysis of the force systems and in vivo study in children and adolescents" 75 : 558-567, 2005

16 Antonarakis GS, "Maxillary molar distalization with noncompliance intramaxillary appliances in Class II malocclusion. A systematic review" 78 : 1133-1140, 2008

17 Kircelli BH, "Maxillary molar distalization with a bone-anchored pendulum appliance" 76 : 650-659, 2006

18 Maino G, "Maxillary molar distalization with MGBM-system in class II malocclusion" 2 : 101-108, 2013

19 Fontana M, "Maxillary molar distalization therapy in adult patients: a multicentre study" 18 : 221-231, 2015

20 Karad A, "KIDS: a new approach to distalize maxillary molars" 9 : 244-254, 2008

21 Grec RH, "Intraoral distalizer effects with conventional and skeletal anchorage:a meta-analysis" 143 : 602-615, 2013

22 Bolla E, "Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods" 72 : 481-494, 2002

23 Ghosh J, "Evaluation of an intraoral maxillary molar distalization technique" 110 : 639-646, 1996

24 Kinzinger GS, "Efficiency of a skeletonized distal jet appliance supported by miniscrew anchorage for noncompliance maxillary molar distalization" 136 : 578-586, 2009

25 Kinzinger GS, "Efficiency of a pendulum appliance for molar distalization related to second and third molar eruption stage" 125 : 8-23, 2004

26 Korn M, "Early treatment with a maxillary lip bumper-bite plateau combination" 78 : 838-846, 2008

27 Bondemark L, "Distalization of maxillary first and second molars simultaneously with repelling magnets" 14 : 264-272, 1992

28 Ahmad Sharafeddin Burhan, "Combined treatment with headgear and the Frog appliance for maxillary molar distalization: a randomized controlled trial" 대한치과교정학회 43 (43): 101-109, 2013

29 Hourfar J, "An active, skeletally anchored transpalatal appliance for derotation, distalization and vertical control of maxillary first molars" 41 (41): S24-S32, 2014

30 Ruhi Nalcaci, "A reliable method for evaluating upper molar distalization: Superimposition of three-dimensional digital models" 대한치과교정학회 45 (45): 82-88, 2015