Question Tags in Korean Conversation: Displaying and Soliciting Empathy for Managing Delicate Action

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

From the perspective of conversation analysis, this study analyzes utterances formatted with a question tag constructed as the tag-type clause kuci, “Isn’t it?.” Based on an examination of naturally occurring talk-in-interaction, it is argued that question tags, though generally intended to be a recipiency-mobilizing resource, serve primarily as a resource for empathy display and are geared toward retroactively managing the various “delicate” actions that their host utterance implements. Formulated as post-predicate elements, their use indicates the speaker’s trust that the recipient will provide an affiliative response by sharing the empathic stance exhibited in their host utterance. The kuci-speaker’s orientation toward soliciting the recipient’s affiliative uptake is frequently reciprocated by the recipient, who registers the “delicate character” of the kuci-marked utterance’s action by producing variously “nuanced” responses, for example, in a way that is empathically other-attentive, obliquely affiliative, or mildly resistant.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Hepburn, A., "“Why do you ask?”: The function of questions in institutional discourse" Oxford University Press 69-86, 2010

2 Ford, C. E., "The language of turn and sequence" Oxford University Press 2002

3 박유정, "The Relationship between Negative Questions and Sentence Final Particles in Korean" 담화·인지언어학회 17 (17): 1-25, 2010

4 Lee, H. S., "Tense, aspect, and modality: A discourse-pragmatic analysis of verbal affixes in Korean" University of California 1991

5 Labov, W., "Some principles of linguistic methodology" 1 (1): 97-120, 1972

6 Kim, K. -H., "Sequential organization of post-predicate elements in Korean conversation : Pursuing uptake and modulating action" 17 (17): 573-604, 2007

7 Schegloff, E. A., "Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis" Cambridge University Press 2007

8 Stivers, T., "Questions: Formal, functional and interactional perspectives" Cambridge University Press 58-80, 2012

9 Yoon, K. -E., "Questions and responses in Korean conversation" 42 : 2782-2798, 2010

10 Jefferson, G., "On the sequential organization of trouble-talk in ordinary conversation" 35 (35): 418-441, 1988

11 Kim, K. -H., "Negatively-formatted requests for confirmation in Korean conversation: Three types of verbal negation as interactional resources" 1-50, 2023

12 Garfinkel, H., "Motivation and social interaction" Ronald Press 187-209, 1963

13 Choi, S.-J., "Modality in grammar and discourse" John Benjamins 165-204, 1995

14 Sacks, H., "Lectures on conversation (Vols. 1 & 2)" Blackwell 1992

15 Suh, C.-S., "Kwukemwunpep (Korean grammar)" Hanyang University Press 2006

16 Clift, R., "Irony in conversation" 28 (28): 523-553, 1999

17 김규현, "Formulating ‘Tag Questions’ in Korean Conversation: Pseudo-tags Ci and Cianha as Interactional Resources" 한국사회언어학회 30 (30): 59-98, 2022

18 Pomerantz, A., "Extreme case formulations : A way of legitimizing claims" 9 (9): 219-229, 1986

19 Heritage, J., "Epistemics in action : Action formation and territories of knowledge" 45 (45): 1-29, 2012

20 Drew, P., "Complaints about transgressions and misconduct" 31 (31): 295-325, 1998

21 Lee, H. S., "Cognitive constraints on expressing newly perceived information, with reference to epistemic modal suffixes in Korean" 4 (4): 135-167, 1993

22 Sacks, H., "A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation" 50 (50): 696-735, 1974

23 Lee, H. S., "A discourse-pragmatic analysis of the committal-ci in Korean : A synthetic approach to the form-meaning relation" 31 : 243-275, 1999

24 김규현, "A Conversation Analysis of Korean Sentence-Ending Modal Suffixes -ney, -kwun(a), and -ta: Noticing as a Social action" 한국사회언어학회 12 (12): 1-36, 2004