RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    Lessons from Exemplary Practices of Digital Citizen-Government Interaction in U.S. State Government

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76577295

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study illustrates practices of digital citizen-government interaction. In particular, this study focuses on three contemporary exemplary practices of digital citizen-government interaction in the United States. This study approaches digital citizen-government interaction in terms of information dissemination and citizen deliberation. Based on this model of digital citizen-government interaction, this study analyzes such three cases as Issue Talk, Minnesota, Public Participation Center, Department of Environmental Protection, Pennsylvania, and the Virginia Regulatory Town Hall, Virginia. Based on the analysis, this study recommends for successful digital citizen-government interaction as follows: 1) develop a realistic time frame, 2) be clear and concise when framing issues, 3) develop a help guide for online policy deliberation for citizens, 4) distribute documents as widely as possible, 5) actively market digital deliberation opportunities for citizens, 6) train public managers to facilitate digital discussions, 7) analyze the results of digital deliberation, and 8) distribute the results of online policy deliberation as widely as possible.
    번역하기

    This study illustrates practices of digital citizen-government interaction. In particular, this study focuses on three contemporary exemplary practices of digital citizen-government interaction in the United States. This study approaches digital citiz...

    This study illustrates practices of digital citizen-government interaction. In particular, this study focuses on three contemporary exemplary practices of digital citizen-government interaction in the United States. This study approaches digital citizen-government interaction in terms of information dissemination and citizen deliberation. Based on this model of digital citizen-government interaction, this study analyzes such three cases as Issue Talk, Minnesota, Public Participation Center, Department of Environmental Protection, Pennsylvania, and the Virginia Regulatory Town Hall, Virginia. Based on the analysis, this study recommends for successful digital citizen-government interaction as follows: 1) develop a realistic time frame, 2) be clear and concise when framing issues, 3) develop a help guide for online policy deliberation for citizens, 4) distribute documents as widely as possible, 5) actively market digital deliberation opportunities for citizens, 6) train public managers to facilitate digital discussions, 7) analyze the results of digital deliberation, and 8) distribute the results of online policy deliberation as widely as possible.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 〈Abstract〉
    • Ⅰ. Introduction
    • Ⅱ. From Traditional to Digital Citizen-Government Interaction
    • Ⅲ. Research Design
    • Ⅳ. Analysis of Digital Policy Forums in State Governments
    • 〈Abstract〉
    • Ⅰ. Introduction
    • Ⅱ. From Traditional to Digital Citizen-Government Interaction
    • Ⅲ. Research Design
    • Ⅳ. Analysis of Digital Policy Forums in State Governments
    • Ⅴ. Conclusion: Recommendations for Active Digital Citizen-Government Interaction
    • Bibliography
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Checkoway,Barry, "What Do We Know about Citizen Participation A Selective Review of Research In : Citizen Participation in America: Essays on the State of the Art" Lexington Books 25-42, 1978

    2 Mossberger,K., "Virtual inequality: Beyond the digital divide" Georgetown University Press 2003

    3 Habermas,Jurgen, "The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 1, Reason and the Rationalization of Society" Beacon Press 1984

    4 Cole,Richard, "The Public Hearings as an Effective Citizen Participation Mechanism" 78 (78): 404-416, 1984

    5 Guthrie,K.K., "The Politics of Citizen Access Technology" 20 : 574-597, 1992

    6 Gore,Al., "The New Job of the Federal Executive" 54 (54): 317-321, 1994

    7 Docter,S., "The First Amendment Online: Santa Monica’s Public Electronic Network In : Cyberdemocracy: Technology, Cities, and Civic Networks" Routledge 125-151, 1998

    8 Lipset,Seymour Martin, "The Confidence Gap: Business, Labor, and Government in the Public Mind" Free Press 1987

    9 Cohen,Nevin, "Technical Assistance for Citizen Participation: A Case Study of New York City’s Environmental Planning Process" 25 (25): 119-135, 1995

    10 O’Sullivan, Elizabethann, "Research Methods for Public Administrators" Longman 1995

    1 Checkoway,Barry, "What Do We Know about Citizen Participation A Selective Review of Research In : Citizen Participation in America: Essays on the State of the Art" Lexington Books 25-42, 1978

    2 Mossberger,K., "Virtual inequality: Beyond the digital divide" Georgetown University Press 2003

    3 Habermas,Jurgen, "The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 1, Reason and the Rationalization of Society" Beacon Press 1984

    4 Cole,Richard, "The Public Hearings as an Effective Citizen Participation Mechanism" 78 (78): 404-416, 1984

    5 Guthrie,K.K., "The Politics of Citizen Access Technology" 20 : 574-597, 1992

    6 Gore,Al., "The New Job of the Federal Executive" 54 (54): 317-321, 1994

    7 Docter,S., "The First Amendment Online: Santa Monica’s Public Electronic Network In : Cyberdemocracy: Technology, Cities, and Civic Networks" Routledge 125-151, 1998

    8 Lipset,Seymour Martin, "The Confidence Gap: Business, Labor, and Government in the Public Mind" Free Press 1987

    9 Cohen,Nevin, "Technical Assistance for Citizen Participation: A Case Study of New York City’s Environmental Planning Process" 25 (25): 119-135, 1995

    10 O’Sullivan, Elizabethann, "Research Methods for Public Administrators" Longman 1995

    11 Catinat,Michel, "Public Policies for Digital Democracyv In : Digital Democracy: Issues of Theory and Practice" SAGE Publications 184-208, 2000

    12 Rosenbaum,Walter A., "Public Involvement as Reform and Ritual: the Development of Federal Participation Programs In : Citizen Participation in America: Essays on the State of the Art" Lexington Books 81-96, 1978

    13 Roberts,Nancy, "Public Deliberation: An Alternative Approach to Crafting Policy and Setting Direction" 57 (57): 124-132, 1997

    14 OECD, "Promise and Problem of E-Democracy: Challenges of Online Citizen Engagement. Available at http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/9/11/35176328.pdf. Accessed January 15, 2008"

    15 Meiklejohn,A., "Political Freedom: The Constitutional Powers of People" Harper 1960

    16 Rosener,Judy, "Making Bureaucracy Responsive: A Study of the Impact of Citizen Participation and Staff Recommendations on Regulatory Decision Making" 42 (42): 339-3445, 1982

    17 U.S.Department of Commerce, "Falling through the Net: Toward Digital Inclusion. Available at http://search.ntia.doc.gov/pdf/fttn00.pdf. Accessed April 27, 2004"

    18 U.S. Department of Commerce, "Falling through the Net: Defining the Digital Divide. Available at http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fttn99/FTTN.pdf. Accessed April 27, 2004"

    19 U.S. Department of Commerce, "Falling through the Net: A Survey of the "Have Nots" in Rural and Urban America. Available at http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fallingthru.html. Accessed April 27, 2004"

    20 U.S. Department of Commerce, "Falling through the Net II: New Data on the Digital Divide. Available at http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/net2/falling.html. Accessed April 27, 2004"

    21 Milward,H.B., "Electronic Government: Linking Citizens to Public Organizations through Technology" 6 : 261-275, 1996

    22 Varley,P., "Electronic Democracy" 94 (94): 42-51, 1991

    23 Luton,Larry, "Citizen-Administrator Connections: Impacts on Public Facility-Siting Decision Making" 25 (25): 114-134, 1993

    24 Crosby,Ned, "Citizen Panels: A New Approach to Citizen Participation" 46 (46): 170-178, 1986

    25 Wang,Xiaohu, "Assessing Public Participation in U.S. Cities" 24 (24): 322-336, 2001

    26 Larson, Elena, ""The Rise of the E-Citizen: How People Use Government Agencies’ Web Sites." Pew Internet and American Life Project. Available at http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=57"

    27 Horrigan, John B., ""How Americans Get in Touch With Government." PEW Internet & American Life Project. Available at http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_E-Gov_Report_0504.pdf. Accessed June 5, 2004"

    28 Iyengar, Shanto, ""Facilitating Informed Public Opinion: Evidence from Face-to-face and Online Deliberative Polls." Available at http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/events/archives/DeliberativePolling.doc. Accessed November 23, 2003"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1 1 1.29
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.21 1.12 1.336 0.13
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼