RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      What Maisie Knew: The Language of Silence as Knowledge and Sexuality

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103951095

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Henry James employs silence as part of his narrative strategy in many of his tales. Such a predilection for reticence, the withholding power of not telling the whole story, adds to the complexity of James’s literature. This paper aims to examine the ways in which James develops the meanings of his tale and the sense of knowledge that grows in Maisie, by exploring the silence symptomatically manifested in the narrative of the juvenile protagonist in What Maisie Knew.
      Maisie’s reticence signifies a strategic withdrawal from the material world into the depths of her interior. James is preoccupied with providing a detailed record of Maisie’s development, with great appeals for the language of silence. Maisie’s interior is explored in terms of knowledge and sexuality growing through her encounters with the corrupt adult world. The sexual, ethical, and social challenges the process poses to Maisie constitute a huge part of Maisie’s education and the major concern of the author. Maisie’s assertion for knowledge at the end remains problematic in determining its epistemological entity. It does not share the moralism of her governess nor the gravity of the author’s preface. It appears as Maisie’s way of summing up her courage to face the world again, despite the failings of the adult.
      번역하기

      Henry James employs silence as part of his narrative strategy in many of his tales. Such a predilection for reticence, the withholding power of not telling the whole story, adds to the complexity of James’s literature. This paper aims to examine the...

      Henry James employs silence as part of his narrative strategy in many of his tales. Such a predilection for reticence, the withholding power of not telling the whole story, adds to the complexity of James’s literature. This paper aims to examine the ways in which James develops the meanings of his tale and the sense of knowledge that grows in Maisie, by exploring the silence symptomatically manifested in the narrative of the juvenile protagonist in What Maisie Knew.
      Maisie’s reticence signifies a strategic withdrawal from the material world into the depths of her interior. James is preoccupied with providing a detailed record of Maisie’s development, with great appeals for the language of silence. Maisie’s interior is explored in terms of knowledge and sexuality growing through her encounters with the corrupt adult world. The sexual, ethical, and social challenges the process poses to Maisie constitute a huge part of Maisie’s education and the major concern of the author. Maisie’s assertion for knowledge at the end remains problematic in determining its epistemological entity. It does not share the moralism of her governess nor the gravity of the author’s preface. It appears as Maisie’s way of summing up her courage to face the world again, despite the failings of the adult.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 James, Henry, "What Maisie Knew" Penguin 1985

      2 James, Henry, "The Turn of the Screw in : The Portable Henry James" Penguin 2004

      3 Rowe, John Carlos, "The Other Henry James" Duke UP 1998

      4 Bell, Millicent, "The Language of Silence: What Maisie Knew. Meaning in Henry James" Harvard UP 243-261, 1991

      5 Leavis, F. R., "The Great Tradition" Penguin Books 1962

      6 Wilson, Edmund, "The Ambiguity of Henry James. The Question of Henry James" Henry Holton and Company 160-190, 1945

      7 Auchincloss, Lous, "Reading in Henry James" University of Minnesota Press 1975

      8 James, Henry, "Preface to the New York Edition. What Maisie Knew" Penguin 23-31, 1985

      9 Vidal, Gore, "Introduction. The Golden Bowl" Penguin 8-18, 1985

      10 Auchard, John, "Heritage of Symbolism and Decaden" The Pennsylvania State UP 1986

      1 James, Henry, "What Maisie Knew" Penguin 1985

      2 James, Henry, "The Turn of the Screw in : The Portable Henry James" Penguin 2004

      3 Rowe, John Carlos, "The Other Henry James" Duke UP 1998

      4 Bell, Millicent, "The Language of Silence: What Maisie Knew. Meaning in Henry James" Harvard UP 243-261, 1991

      5 Leavis, F. R., "The Great Tradition" Penguin Books 1962

      6 Wilson, Edmund, "The Ambiguity of Henry James. The Question of Henry James" Henry Holton and Company 160-190, 1945

      7 Auchincloss, Lous, "Reading in Henry James" University of Minnesota Press 1975

      8 James, Henry, "Preface to the New York Edition. What Maisie Knew" Penguin 23-31, 1985

      9 Vidal, Gore, "Introduction. The Golden Bowl" Penguin 8-18, 1985

      10 Auchard, John, "Heritage of Symbolism and Decaden" The Pennsylvania State UP 1986

      11 Weinstein, Philip M, "Henry James and the Requirements of the Imagination" Harvard UP 1971

      12 Stevens, Hugh, "Henry James and Sexuality" Cambridge UP 1998

      13 Bellringer, Alan W, "English Morality—The Spoils of Poynton, What Maisie Knew, The Turn of the Screw" St. Martin’s Press 86-104, 1988

      14 McWhirter, David, "Desire and Love in Henry James: A Study of the Late Novels" Cambridge UP 1989

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.45 0.45 0.45
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.4 0.38 0.67 0.23
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼