다원성과 통합성의 조화 -고려사회와 라이프니츠의 조화론을 중심으로- = Harmony of pluralism and unity -Focused on Koryo dynasty and Leibniz`s theory of harmony-

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The main purpose of this paper is to discuss the ways of social management by considering Koryo Dynasty which is a plural society with the framework of Leibniz’s harmony theory. Leibniz’s philosophical ideas and the sociological tendency of Koryo Dynasty are historically not in any relationship with each other and each is comprised of its own heterogeneous areas. However, they share some meaningful structural similarity in respect that they both distinguishingly center on the harmony between pluralism and unity. It is noticeable for Koryo Dynasty to sustain a long period of stable prosperity just as pluralism and unity in it was in harmony and balanced, whereas it was insecurely disintegrated when the gap between them was critically increasing. In this perspective, this paper intends to explore the way of acquiring the stability of a society by taking a close look at the history through the very philosophical thought, which is considered as the most systematic theory for the harmony of pluralism and unity. Pluralism has a twofold potential with regard to social management. On the one hand, the spread of pluralism, if it is accompanied by solid integration, constitutes a key mechanism to contribute to the stability and development of a society. What makes it possible is in the way that central and local forces hold the relative autonomy through an adequate tension between them. On the other hand, in case of collapsing the harmony between pluralism and unity, thereby, the society inevitably experiences the transformation of its structure, and, further, the remaining society breaks down or is replaced by other types of society. Koryo Dynasty originally started as a pluralistic social structure, though, its rise and fall seems to have been determined by whether it successfully maintained the balance between pluralism and unity or not. If so, we are able to reach a possible and crucial lesson in the consideration of Koryo dynasty with the framework of Leibniz’s harmony theory, namely, that we can secure a stable society when timely settling the societal structural system which can provide the balance of pluralism and unity. In this regard, this paper focuses largely on three parts as follows. First, in philosophical and sociological perspective, it makes a general overview of pluralism. Second, it specifically determines the Leibniz’s concept of pluralism in his philosophical thought. Finally, it derives some meaningful ways when it comes to social management by comparatively considering both the Leibniz’s harmony model of pluralism and unity and Koryo Dynasty’s pluralism.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 라이프니츠, "형이상학 논고" 아카넷 2010

2 김용석, "현자에게는 고정관념이 없다" 한울 2009

3 김형효, "포스트 모더니즘의 철학" (18) : 144-159, 1993

4 프랑수아 줄리앙, "전략: 고대 그리스에서 현대 중국까지" 교유서가 2015

5 스피노자, "신학정치론·정치학논고" 비르투 2011

6 이근세, "스피노자의 정치철학에서 개인의 자유와 정치적 복종의 관계" 대동철학회 (67) : 125-150, 2014

7 박종기, "새로 쓴 500년 고려사" 푸른역사 2008

8 프랑수아 줄리앙, "사물의 성향" 한울 2009

9 이근세, "블롱델의 행동철학과 라이프니츠의 실체적 연결고리 가설" 서양근대철학회 6 : 127-161, 2011

10 이근세, "변신론" 아카넷 2014

11 라이프니츠, "라이프니츠가 만난 중국" 이학사 2003

12 박종기, "고려사의 재발견 : 한반도 역사상 가장 개방적이고 역동적인 500년 고려 역사를 만나다" Humanist(휴머니스트) 2015

13 박종기, "고려 다원사회의 형성과 기원" 한국중세사학회 (36) : 109-140, 2013

14 칼 폴라니, "거대한 전환" 길 2009

15 André Lalande, "Vocabulaire technique et critique de la philosophie vol.2" PUF 1927

16 François Jullien, "Transformations silencieuses" Bernard Grasset 2009

17 André Berten, "Philosophie et société" (78) : 271-291, 1990

18 André Berten, "Modernité et postmodernité: un enjeu politique?" (81) : 84-112, 1991

19 Jérémie Griard, "Le meilleur réime selon Leibniz" 31 (31): 349-372, 2004

20 Maurice Blondel, "L'Action, t.I, Le problème des causes secondes et le pur agir" Alcan 1936

21 Alexandre Matheron, "Individu et communauté chez Spinoza" Les Ed. de Minuit 1969

22 P. L. Berger, "Aspects sociologiques du pluralisme" (23) : 117-127, 1967