RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    기술영향평가의 메타평가 모형 및 지표개발

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106044025

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Technology assessment focuses on providing information and participation of public. And it could be considered as a type of policy analysis(narrowly) as well as a type of policy evaluation(widely). Based on these characteristics, meta-evaluation model for technology assessment was developed.
      The system of technology assessment can be understood as a circulation of ‘planning’, ‘input’, ‘process’, ‘output’, and ‘utilization’. Delphi method was used to verify the validity of meta-evaluation model and indicators determined through the theoretical review. Delphi survey was consisted of twelve experts and it was performed three rounds in total. Eventually, total forty eight evaluation indicators were developed. As an important point of view, the five components of meta-evaluation model for technology assessment included sub-items as follow: evaluation purpose, evaluation design and objective(technology) in evaluation planning; evaluator, evaluation organization, evaluation budget and information in evaluation input; evaluation method and procedure in evaluation process; evaluation credibility, evaluation availability and reporting in evaluation output; and impact on policy and public in evaluation utilization.
      And then, the reliability verification was performed by the members of Technology Selection Committee and Technology Assessment Committee. The survey of twenty six members turned out that Cronbachs α was over .60 in evaluation items and components, and the overall reliability was .9448 which was high enough.
    번역하기

      Technology assessment focuses on providing information and participation of public. And it could be considered as a type of policy analysis(narrowly) as well as a type of policy evaluation(widely). Based on these characteristics, meta-evaluation m...

      Technology assessment focuses on providing information and participation of public. And it could be considered as a type of policy analysis(narrowly) as well as a type of policy evaluation(widely). Based on these characteristics, meta-evaluation model for technology assessment was developed.
      The system of technology assessment can be understood as a circulation of ‘planning’, ‘input’, ‘process’, ‘output’, and ‘utilization’. Delphi method was used to verify the validity of meta-evaluation model and indicators determined through the theoretical review. Delphi survey was consisted of twelve experts and it was performed three rounds in total. Eventually, total forty eight evaluation indicators were developed. As an important point of view, the five components of meta-evaluation model for technology assessment included sub-items as follow: evaluation purpose, evaluation design and objective(technology) in evaluation planning; evaluator, evaluation organization, evaluation budget and information in evaluation input; evaluation method and procedure in evaluation process; evaluation credibility, evaluation availability and reporting in evaluation output; and impact on policy and public in evaluation utilization.
      And then, the reliability verification was performed by the members of Technology Selection Committee and Technology Assessment Committee. The survey of twenty six members turned out that Cronbachs α was over .60 in evaluation items and components, and the overall reliability was .9448 which was high enough.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 남궁근, "행정조사방법론" 법문사 2003

    2 김순남, "학교평가의 메타평가 준거개발" 2002

    3 배호순, "프로그램평가론" 1994

    4 김인호, "체계적 기술영향평가 방안에 관한 연구" 한국과학기술기획평가원 1999

    5 박종수, "정보화사업 메타평가모형의 설계와 적용" 2003

    6 이영희, "유럽의 기술영향평가" 과학기술정책관리연구소 1997

    7 이찬구, "연구개발사업의 메타평가에 관한 연구: 정보통신 분야를 중심으로" 1997

    8 김종길, "신기술 확산에 따른 기술사회족 역기능의 전개과정 및 대응전략" 1 (1): 235-259, 2001

    9 임성옥, "사회복지시설 평가에 대한 메타평가" 2003

    10 신태영, "기술예측방법론" 과학기술정책관리연구소 1995

    1 남궁근, "행정조사방법론" 법문사 2003

    2 김순남, "학교평가의 메타평가 준거개발" 2002

    3 배호순, "프로그램평가론" 1994

    4 김인호, "체계적 기술영향평가 방안에 관한 연구" 한국과학기술기획평가원 1999

    5 박종수, "정보화사업 메타평가모형의 설계와 적용" 2003

    6 이영희, "유럽의 기술영향평가" 과학기술정책관리연구소 1997

    7 이찬구, "연구개발사업의 메타평가에 관한 연구: 정보통신 분야를 중심으로" 1997

    8 김종길, "신기술 확산에 따른 기술사회족 역기능의 전개과정 및 대응전략" 1 (1): 235-259, 2001

    9 임성옥, "사회복지시설 평가에 대한 메타평가" 2003

    10 신태영, "기술예측방법론" 과학기술정책관리연구소 1995

    11 박병무, "기술영향평가 제도운영을 위한 추진방안 기획연구" 한국과학기술기획평가원 2002

    12 김재우, "국내외 기술평가모델 체계화: 기술평가방법, 유형, 기법을 중심으로" 한국과학기술정보연구원 2004

    13 이영희, "과학기술의 사회적 통제와 수용성 연구: 생명공학을 중심으로" 1 (1): 71-103, 2001

    14 송위진, "과학기술과 사회의 주요 쟁점분석 연구" 과학기술정책연구원 2003

    15 김명수, "공공정책평가론" 박영사 2003

    16 Standard, "The State of the Art" The Johns Hopkins University Press 146-163, 1981

    17 Schot, Johan, "The Past and Future of Constructive Technology Assessment" 54 : 251-268, 1996

    18 Yi, Chan Goo, "The National R&D Evaluation System in the UK: Meta-evaluation and Applicability to the Korea Case" 2003

    19 Palm, Elin, "The Case for Ethical Technology Assessment: eTA" 73 : 543-558, 2005

    20 Braun, Ernest, "Technology in Context: Technology Assessment for Managers" London and New York: Routledge 1998

    21 Bongers, F. J, "Technology and society: GSS-supported participatory policy analysis" 19 (19): 269-287, 2000

    22 Eijndhoven, Jos, "Technology Assessment: Product or Process?" 54 : 269-286, 1997

    23 Vig, Norman J, "Technology Assessment in Comparative Perspective" Albany: State University of New York Press 3-35, 2000

    24 Petermann, Thomas, "Technology Assessment Units in the European Parliamentary Systems" Albany: State University of New York Press 37-61, 2000

    25 Paris, "Society and Assessment of Technology" OECD 1973

    26 Genus, Audley, "Rethinking Constructive Technology Assessment as Democratic, Reflective, Discourse" 73 : 13-26, 2006

    27 Guston, David H, "Real-time Technology Assessment" 24 : 93-109, 2002

    28 Vedung, Evert, "Public Policy and Program Evaluation" New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers 1997

    29 Worthen, Blaine R, "Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines" White Plains: Longman Publishers 1997

    30 Genus, Audley, "On Constructive Technology Assessment and Limitations on Public Participation in Technology Assessment" 17 (17): 433-443, 2005

    31 in Eleanor Chelimsky, "Old Patterns and New Directions in Program Evaluation The American Society for Public Administration" elea (elea): 1-35, 1985

    32 Hong, Heung Deug, "Meta-evaluation of National Large-Scale R&D Programmes: A Comparison of Evaluation Systems of 6 National R&D Programs" 2000

    33 Gotthard, "Democratic Function of Technology Assessment in Technology Policy Making" 11-16, 1993

    34 Porter, "A Guidebook for Technology Assessment and Impact Analysis" 1980

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.73 0.73 0.64
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.84 0.95 0.738 0.32
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼