RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      勤勞倫理의 決定要因과 結果 : 槪念的 MODEL = Antecedents and Consequences of Work Ethic : A Conceptual Model

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A3030925

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The topic of work ethic has been studied widely by social scientists, and particularly by organizational psychologists under the influence of Max Weber (1930). However, two limitations in the past literature of work ethic seem to be paramount. First, in most of the studies, the definition (usually operationalized as Protestant work ethic) lack clarity and contemporary relevance. Secondly, there has been a dearth of attempts to build theoretical model of work ethic. This study aims to overcome these limitations.
      Specifically, it suggests the definition of work ethic, which consists of three components -- i.e., the value of work vs, nonwork, work centrality, and work attitudes. It also suggests a conceptual model, which distinguishes between work ethic and work motivation, each being hypothesized as influenced by the different sets of antecedents. In this model, work ethic is hypothesized to directly influence performance and job satisfaction and indirectly through its effect on work motivation. The implications and future research needs are also mentioned.
      번역하기

      The topic of work ethic has been studied widely by social scientists, and particularly by organizational psychologists under the influence of Max Weber (1930). However, two limitations in the past literature of work ethic seem to be paramount. First, ...

      The topic of work ethic has been studied widely by social scientists, and particularly by organizational psychologists under the influence of Max Weber (1930). However, two limitations in the past literature of work ethic seem to be paramount. First, in most of the studies, the definition (usually operationalized as Protestant work ethic) lack clarity and contemporary relevance. Secondly, there has been a dearth of attempts to build theoretical model of work ethic. This study aims to overcome these limitations.
      Specifically, it suggests the definition of work ethic, which consists of three components -- i.e., the value of work vs, nonwork, work centrality, and work attitudes. It also suggests a conceptual model, which distinguishes between work ethic and work motivation, each being hypothesized as influenced by the different sets of antecedents. In this model, work ethic is hypothesized to directly influence performance and job satisfaction and indirectly through its effect on work motivation. The implications and future research needs are also mentioned.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 序論
      • Ⅱ. 勤勞倫理의 槪念
      • 2.1 勤勞倫理의 定義
      • 2.2 勤勞倫理와 勤勞價値觀
      • Ⅲ. 勤勞倫理의 決定要因과 結果
      • Ⅰ. 序論
      • Ⅱ. 勤勞倫理의 槪念
      • 2.1 勤勞倫理의 定義
      • 2.2 勤勞倫理와 勤勞價値觀
      • Ⅲ. 勤勞倫理의 決定要因과 結果
      • 3.1 勤勞倫理의 槪念的 Model
      • 3.2 勤勞倫理의 決定要因
      • 3.3 勤勞意慾의 決定要因
      • 3.4 勤勞倫理와 勤勞意慾의 效果
      • Ⅳ. 結論
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼