RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      공정경쟁, 공정거래, 그리고 경쟁법 = Fair Competition, Fair Trade and Competition Law

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99872399

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The prize-penalty mechanism of market awards prizes to individual behaviors that fulfill social needs and penalizes otherwise, and functions best when pursuit of private interests satisfies social needs. Selfish individual will use resources efficiently only when it pays her to do so. Fair competing power comes from efficient use of resources to generate fair bargaining power which will in turn bring due prize. The core of the competition policy must be the one that eliminates all the unfair artificial barries to entry, since the entry-barriers are the ultimate source unfair competition. In practice, however, there is a wide range of entry barriers from the position of incumbency through lawful patent or copyrights to good brand built by good past performances, each of which is neither unlawful nor easy to eliminate. Therefore the competition laws of real world mainly address to monopolization, collusion, and abuse of dominant position making use of these entry barriers. The core of competition law, however, is the elimination of the unfair entry barriers, and this trend is well-revealed in recent adoption of essential facility doctrine and compulsory licensing of patent rights.
      번역하기

      The prize-penalty mechanism of market awards prizes to individual behaviors that fulfill social needs and penalizes otherwise, and functions best when pursuit of private interests satisfies social needs. Selfish individual will use resources efficient...

      The prize-penalty mechanism of market awards prizes to individual behaviors that fulfill social needs and penalizes otherwise, and functions best when pursuit of private interests satisfies social needs. Selfish individual will use resources efficiently only when it pays her to do so. Fair competing power comes from efficient use of resources to generate fair bargaining power which will in turn bring due prize. The core of the competition policy must be the one that eliminates all the unfair artificial barries to entry, since the entry-barriers are the ultimate source unfair competition. In practice, however, there is a wide range of entry barriers from the position of incumbency through lawful patent or copyrights to good brand built by good past performances, each of which is neither unlawful nor easy to eliminate. Therefore the competition laws of real world mainly address to monopolization, collusion, and abuse of dominant position making use of these entry barriers. The core of competition law, however, is the elimination of the unfair entry barriers, and this trend is well-revealed in recent adoption of essential facility doctrine and compulsory licensing of patent rights.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Karl Marx, "http://www.marxists.org/archive/ marx/works/download/pdf/Poverty-Philosophy.pdf"

      2 "The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union"

      3 Tony Freyer, "Legal Restraints on Economic Coordination: Antitrust in Great Britain and America, 1880-1920, In Coordination and Information" National Bureau of Economic Research, The University of Chicago Press 1995

      4 이승훈, "2인교섭게임에서 외부기회와 교섭력" 45 (45): 273-293,

      1 Karl Marx, "http://www.marxists.org/archive/ marx/works/download/pdf/Poverty-Philosophy.pdf"

      2 "The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union"

      3 Tony Freyer, "Legal Restraints on Economic Coordination: Antitrust in Great Britain and America, 1880-1920, In Coordination and Information" National Bureau of Economic Research, The University of Chicago Press 1995

      4 이승훈, "2인교섭게임에서 외부기회와 교섭력" 45 (45): 273-293,

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.58 0.58 0.52
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.45 0.36 0.783 0.06
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼