RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    수학과 수행평가에 관한 이해의 혼돈 -최근 국내 논문 분석을 중심으로- = A Chaos of Understanding on Performance Assessment in Mathematics Education

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A30057241

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    From the mid-1990s in Korea, performance assessment has continuously emphasized school mathematics and thus many researchers and teachers have been steadily studying this topic. But, the concepts relevant to performance assessment and its purposed are very confusing because the mathematics educations` different views and voices are vary. As a result most mathematics teachers experience trouble in executing performance assessment was once again revealed in this study which dealt with 15 articles in performance assessment. these 15 articles includes almost every article written on the topic of performance assessment that have been published in 4 domestic journals since December 1997. By examining this inability, it is required that its concepts and purposed should be organized with a common view and newly defined in the near future. Therefore, to successfully accomplish this, this paper outlines the basic problems on the understanding of performance assessment as follows: · What is the proper types(methods) of performance assessment? · Is the subject test a type of performance assessment? · What is the difference between subject test and essay test? · What is the relationship between performance assessment and performance tasks? · What is the relationship between performance tests and project method? · What is a project method? · It is assessment standard or scoring standard to score a test result? · What is the difference between analytic scoring method and holistic scoring method?
    번역하기

    From the mid-1990s in Korea, performance assessment has continuously emphasized school mathematics and thus many researchers and teachers have been steadily studying this topic. But, the concepts relevant to performance assessment and its purposed are...

    From the mid-1990s in Korea, performance assessment has continuously emphasized school mathematics and thus many researchers and teachers have been steadily studying this topic. But, the concepts relevant to performance assessment and its purposed are very confusing because the mathematics educations` different views and voices are vary. As a result most mathematics teachers experience trouble in executing performance assessment was once again revealed in this study which dealt with 15 articles in performance assessment. these 15 articles includes almost every article written on the topic of performance assessment that have been published in 4 domestic journals since December 1997. By examining this inability, it is required that its concepts and purposed should be organized with a common view and newly defined in the near future. Therefore, to successfully accomplish this, this paper outlines the basic problems on the understanding of performance assessment as follows: · What is the proper types(methods) of performance assessment? · Is the subject test a type of performance assessment? · What is the difference between subject test and essay test? · What is the relationship between performance assessment and performance tasks? · What is the relationship between performance tests and project method? · What is a project method? · It is assessment standard or scoring standard to score a test result? · What is the difference between analytic scoring method and holistic scoring method?

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.82 0.82 0.93
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.95 0.96 1.191 0.31
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼