국가연구개발사업의 공공가치 개념 도입방안 = An Analysis and Policy Recommendations for Applying the Notion of Public Value to National R&D Programs

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Along with the economic and social development in Korea, the national R&D programs has focused on not only economic, industrial, and commercial values but also those for basic research, environmental technologies, and social welfare which private firms rarely carry out. Public value become increasingly an important end of innovation in USA and Europe, and also in Korea national R&D puts more emphasis on public value. From this point of view, this study aims to examine the current application of public value in national R&D plan and programs of Korea and to make policy suggestions for applying the notion of public value to Korean R&D programs properly.
For this purpose, firstly, this study provides rationale for employing the notion of public value and suggest the basic directions for its application by reviewing the concept and theories. Secondly, this study examines foreign and domestic cases of public value application and draws implications. Foreign cases include the US, UK, Netherlands, Germany and Denmark. For domestic case studies this study scrutinizes the programs for broadcasting, agriculture and rural economy, and public welfare and security. Thirdly, this study carries out analyses for applying the notion of public value at the levels of (1) national R&D agenda and plan (the national basic plan for science and technology), (2) national R&D planning and evaluation process, (3) related rules and guidelines, and (4) a specific R&D program, and provide some suggestions for policy improvement.
This study, especially by placing emphasis on the analyses below, raises policy issues and provides policy recommendations for the application of public value. First, at the levels of (1) national R&D agenda and plan (the national basic plan for science and technology), it focuses mainly on scientific/technological and economic performance. Therefore, the notions of public value should be reflected more in the national basic plan for science and technology which contains the highest-level plans and directions for national R&D programs.
At the national R&D planning and evaluation process, the evaluation criteria in preliminary feasibility test are centered around economic, technological, and policy feasibility. Hence, the notion of public value should be more included in the evaluation criteria by reforming the process, and moreover the weighting of public value should be increased for R&D programs of public technology development where public value are emphasized.
At the level of rules and guidelines, qualitative evaluation recently has been more emphasized, however, the evaluation indices for social performance which is closely related with public value are mixed with those for economic values in the evaluation criteria for the national R&D programs. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the indices for performance evaluation criteria and to revise the indices from the viewpoints of public value in the scientific, technological, economic, social, and infra-structural performances.
The results from the analysis of individual programs (such as R&D programs in the health and welfare area), performance evaluation indices have not been well developed according to different types of programs and projects at the individual programs level. For instance, the social influence of new technology developments can be different according to different sub areas such as vaccination, prescription, treatment, and rehabilitation. Therefore, different evaluation measures for different influences in terms of public values must be considered.
Lastly, the authors point out that this study attempts to provide policy suggestions to solve out policy problems beyond merely summarizing literature and exploring new research issues/methods. Also, the authors hope that this study can contribute to the well-working of the original nature and role of national R&D programs by sugg

목차 (Table of Contents)

• [표지]
• [발간사]
• [목차]
• 표목차
• 그림목차
• [요약]
• [제1장 서론]
• [제2장 공공가치의 개념 이론 및 관련개념]
• 제1절 공공가치(Public Value) 관련 개념 및 공공가치 개념의 대두 배경
• 제2절 공공가치(Public Value)에 대한 개념적 논의
• 제3절 본 연구에서의 공공가치의 개념 정의
• 제4절 국가연구개발사업에서의 공공가치 개념 적용 논거 및 적용방향
• [제3장 국내외 공공가치(Public Value) 적용 사례 및 시사점]
• 제1절 해외
• 제2절 국내
• 제3절 시사점
• [제4장 우리나라 국가연구개발사업에의 공공가치 개념 적용을 위한 분석 및 과제]
• 제1절 분석접근법 및 국가연구개발사업 분류 및 PV 개념 우선 적용사업 유형 도출
• 제2절 국가연구개발사업 상위계획·정책 수준
• 제3절 국가연구개발사업 총괄적 기획 평가 시스템 수준
• 제4절 지침 수준
• 제5절 사업 수준
• [제5장 결론 및 정책제언]
• 제1절 종합
• 제2절 정책제언 및 맺음말
• [참고문헌]
• [부록]
• [Summary]
• [Contents]