地方自治團體 公共勤勞事業의 成果評價에 關한 硏究 = (A) Study on the Appraisement of Public Works in Local Government

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study is to examine some of the significance, performance, and appraisement of public works in local government and to propose how to improve the unemployment policy in the IMF era. This research reports on a study whose purpose was to assess conceptual issues and research strategies for the study of public works and its improvement.
To evaluate the performance of public works, this study focuses on five research perspectives: organization, workers, finance, program, and output(outcome) management. This study also employs a survey questionnaire based on five perspectives and the survey was administered to two groups. One is 230 public administrators of 23 counties or cities(10 officials of each county or city) in Kyungbuk province. The other is 460 workers(20 workers of each county or city) in same province. The survey questionnaire for worker group is composed of four perspectives, except the financial aspect.
The research data are analyzed using four statistical methods: frequency, reliability, bivariate correlation, and multiple regression analysis. These statistical methods are useful in examining the interrelationships between performance and productivity of public works in local governments. Research variables are evaluated to see how closely they are associated with the productivity of public works in local government.
Findings from this study indicate that the most significant causes for a decrease in public works' productivity are (1) inaccurate statistical data for unemployment, (2) inadequate task guideline and huge managerial works for the unemployed, (3) low level of welfare facilities and poor work conditions, (4) ineffectual working programs. Also identified by this study are the most important factors for public work's improvement: (1) strengthening the examination of the applicants qualifications to public works, (2) necessity of new budget subject for public work, (3) extension the working period, and (4) elimination of worker's moral hazard. These finding or suggestions are expected to support the idea that a public productivity perspective is useful in analyzing public works.
Many new ideas for improving productivity have recently emerged in the field. Practical applications of these approaches offer improvements in efficiency, provide better quality products, and allow employees to work more intelligently. For these reasons, the significance of this study is that it represents an important research source for the development of further research on public works in local government, dealing with productivity planning, measurement, enhancement, and the formation of management theory. In line with these perspectives, the implications of this study provides recommendations for future research.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 目次 = ⅰ
• 第1章 序論 = 1
• 第1節 硏究의 目的 = 1
• 第2節 硏究의 範圍 및 方法 = 3
• 1. 연구범위 = 3
• 2. 연구방법 = 4
• 第2章 公共勤勞事業 意義 및 類型 = 5
• 第1節 公共勤勞事業 推進背景 = 5
• 第2節 公共勤勞事業 意義 및 特徵 = 6
• 1. 공공근로사업 의의 및 필요성 = 7
• 2. 공공근로사업 특징 = 8
• 第3節 公共勤勞事業 類型 = 12
• 1. 사업주체에 따른 분류 = 12
• 2. 사업내용에 따른 분류 = 13
• 3. 사업기간에 따른 분류 = 15
• 4. 사업참가자의 특성에 따른 분류 = 15
• 第4節 外國 公共勤勞事業 事例硏究 = 17
• 1. 미국 = 17
• 2. 영국 = 19
• 3. 독일 = 21
• 4. 스웨덴 = 21
• 5. 프랑스 = 22
• 6. 일본 = 23
• 第3章 地方自治團體 公共勤勞事業 運營에 關한 評價硏究 = 25
• 第1節 地方自治團體 公共勤勞事業 現況 = 25
• 1. ’98 지방자치단체 공공근로사업 추진현황 = 25
• 2. ’99 지방자치단체 공공근로사업 추진현황 = 27
• 第2節 公共勤勞事業 體系 및 內容 = 30
• 1. 공공근로사업 조직운영 체계 = 30
• 2. 공공근로사업 예산 = 34
• 3. 공공근로사업 근로자관리 = 38
• 4. 공공근로사업 관리 및 지도감독 = 55
• 第3節 公共勤勞事業 成果分析을 위한 評價基準 = 58
• 1. 조직관리 분야 = 59
• 2. 근로자관리 분야 = 59
• 3. 재정관리 분야 = 60
• 4. 사업관리 분야 = 61
• 5. 산출(성과)관리 분야 = 62
• 第4章 公共勤勞事業 實態分析 = 63
• 第1節 調査設計 = 63
• 1. 조사대상 = 63
• 2. 조사실시 및 방법 = 64
• 3. 분석모형(분석의 틀) = 67
• 4. 분석방법 = 68
• 第2節 公共勤勞事業 實態分析 結果 = 68
• 1. 표본의 특성 = 68
• 2. 설문조사 결과분석 = 71
• 第5章 地方自治團體 公共勤勞事業에 대한 改善策 = 92
• 第1節 組織 分野 = 92
• 第2節 勤勞者 分野 = 94
• 第3節 財政 分野 = 97
• 第4節 事業 分野 = 99
• 第5節 算出(成果) 分野 = 101
• 第6章 結論 = 104
• 第1節 硏究의 要約 = 104
• 第2節 硏究의 限界 및 提言 = 108
• 參考文獻 = 109
• ABSTRACT = 112
• 附錄(說問紙) = 114