RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      全北任實方言 硏究 = A Study of Im-sil Dialects

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19618421

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Through collecting some basic dialects in Im-sil district, we are going to find their characteristics in phonology, syntax, and lexicography. We've collected and investigated about 720 lexical items.
      The investigation method we adopted is the direct question & answer between investigators and informants. Our informants' average age is over sixty, and they have lived there all their lives.
      The results are as follows;
      1. Phonology.
      A. Their phonological system is found to be almost similar to that of central dialects. We can confirm their vowel system is composed of ten vowels, distinguishing /e/ from /ε/. This phenomenon is different from our common knowledge about it.
      B. Every single vowel alternates actively in all the vowels. The alternative phenomena between /e/ and /ε/ occur in accordance with back vowel and umlaut respectively.
      C. Their umlaut phenomena are extensive and similar to those of both central and kyoung-sang dialects.
      D. Diphthongs with consonant in the initial syllable usually alternates with single vowel.
      E. We find their palatalization more various than that of central dialects. This phenomena are sure to occur when the condition is given in the first and second syllable.
      F. Glottalized phenomenon is more productive than aspirated phenomenon.
      Ⅱ. Syntax.
      A. The form" -(h??) d??e" is the predicate of matrix sentence which dominates the complementrary structure.
      B. The form "-jad??i" has a [+Active] as syntactic property while the forms "-d??i" and "d??e" don't
      C. The forms "a/??rau" and "-d??irau" can be integrated with the form "-ja d??i" but can't be integrated with the form "(h??) d??e" naturally.
      D. The form "-d??i" is pronounced with rising intonation and assumed to be tag-question usage for the moment.
      D. While the form "-d??i" with explanatory final ending is used as a Korean general form as a converbum, the form "-jad??e" isn't.
      F. The purpose of this paper is to point out the general fallacy of classifying the form "-had??i" and "-had??e" as a traditional distinctive features of dialect form (allomorph) in Im-sil dialect, when collecting data of dialect syntax with a special criteria.
      Ⅲ. Lexicology.
      Aiming to establish lexical system of subdialect, lexical category is limited within a scope of semantic method and posture. We investigate it with pure and unconfused semantic approach. We describe them synchronically; the meanings of Im-sil dialects based on informents' detailed expressions. We contrast them with standard language. Any particular expression, if necessary, is selectively accounted in the main body.
      번역하기

      Through collecting some basic dialects in Im-sil district, we are going to find their characteristics in phonology, syntax, and lexicography. We've collected and investigated about 720 lexical items. The investigation method we adopted is the direct ...

      Through collecting some basic dialects in Im-sil district, we are going to find their characteristics in phonology, syntax, and lexicography. We've collected and investigated about 720 lexical items.
      The investigation method we adopted is the direct question & answer between investigators and informants. Our informants' average age is over sixty, and they have lived there all their lives.
      The results are as follows;
      1. Phonology.
      A. Their phonological system is found to be almost similar to that of central dialects. We can confirm their vowel system is composed of ten vowels, distinguishing /e/ from /ε/. This phenomenon is different from our common knowledge about it.
      B. Every single vowel alternates actively in all the vowels. The alternative phenomena between /e/ and /ε/ occur in accordance with back vowel and umlaut respectively.
      C. Their umlaut phenomena are extensive and similar to those of both central and kyoung-sang dialects.
      D. Diphthongs with consonant in the initial syllable usually alternates with single vowel.
      E. We find their palatalization more various than that of central dialects. This phenomena are sure to occur when the condition is given in the first and second syllable.
      F. Glottalized phenomenon is more productive than aspirated phenomenon.
      Ⅱ. Syntax.
      A. The form" -(h??) d??e" is the predicate of matrix sentence which dominates the complementrary structure.
      B. The form "-jad??i" has a [+Active] as syntactic property while the forms "-d??i" and "d??e" don't
      C. The forms "a/??rau" and "-d??irau" can be integrated with the form "-ja d??i" but can't be integrated with the form "(h??) d??e" naturally.
      D. The form "-d??i" is pronounced with rising intonation and assumed to be tag-question usage for the moment.
      D. While the form "-d??i" with explanatory final ending is used as a Korean general form as a converbum, the form "-jad??e" isn't.
      F. The purpose of this paper is to point out the general fallacy of classifying the form "-had??i" and "-had??e" as a traditional distinctive features of dialect form (allomorph) in Im-sil dialect, when collecting data of dialect syntax with a special criteria.
      Ⅲ. Lexicology.
      Aiming to establish lexical system of subdialect, lexical category is limited within a scope of semantic method and posture. We investigate it with pure and unconfused semantic approach. We describe them synchronically; the meanings of Im-sil dialects based on informents' detailed expressions. We contrast them with standard language. Any particular expression, if necessary, is selectively accounted in the main body.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 緖論
      • Ⅱ. 本論
      • 2. 1. 音韻論
      • 2. 1. 1. 音韻體系
      • 2. 1. 2. 單母音 交替
      • Ⅰ. 緖論
      • Ⅱ. 本論
      • 2. 1. 音韻論
      • 2. 1. 1. 音韻體系
      • 2. 1. 2. 單母音 交替
      • 2. 1. 3. Umlaut 現象
      • 2. 1. 4. 二重 母音의 交替
      • 2. 1. 5. 口蓋音化 現象
      • 2. 1. 6. 硬音化와 激音化現象
      • 2. 1. 7. 子音 添加
      • 2. 2. 文 法 論
      • '-허제'와 '-야지'에 대하여
      • -任實方言의 한 統辭論的 特徵으로-
      • 2. 3. 語彙論
      • 2. 4. 語彙目錄
      • Ⅲ. 結論
      • Ⅳ. 參考論者
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼