RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Exploring Voices: The Macrofunctions of Language within a Community of Practice

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99564567

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This present study explores ideational, interpersonal, and textual voices of three groups of Korean, Chinese, and Japanese students in an EFL writing course at a university in Korea. The data comprise nine students’ opinion writing and interviews with them. The ‘macrofunctions of language’ (Halliday, 1985) and Toulmin (2003) elements as the main frameworks were used to analyze the data. The findings indicate that the Korean students had the same topic, whereas Chinese and Japanese students focused on a variety of issues on their daily lives and L1 to generate ideas and construct outlines of writing in the ideational voice. In the interpersonal voice, 78% of the students wanted to have an idea sharer, a frank friend, or a listener as their ideal reader rather than receiving an authoritative feedback from the teacher. In the textual voice, all the students, except one Korean, included the basic Toulmin elements, claim, data, and warrant but few of the second-level elements, backing, qualifier, and rebuttal n their essays. The first pronoun ‘I’ took the role of opinion-holder in students’ texts. Based on these findings, implications are made for teachers to take into account writer voice in writing classrooms of mixed ethnic groups.
      번역하기

      This present study explores ideational, interpersonal, and textual voices of three groups of Korean, Chinese, and Japanese students in an EFL writing course at a university in Korea. The data comprise nine students’ opinion writing and interviews wi...

      This present study explores ideational, interpersonal, and textual voices of three groups of Korean, Chinese, and Japanese students in an EFL writing course at a university in Korea. The data comprise nine students’ opinion writing and interviews with them. The ‘macrofunctions of language’ (Halliday, 1985) and Toulmin (2003) elements as the main frameworks were used to analyze the data. The findings indicate that the Korean students had the same topic, whereas Chinese and Japanese students focused on a variety of issues on their daily lives and L1 to generate ideas and construct outlines of writing in the ideational voice. In the interpersonal voice, 78% of the students wanted to have an idea sharer, a frank friend, or a listener as their ideal reader rather than receiving an authoritative feedback from the teacher. In the textual voice, all the students, except one Korean, included the basic Toulmin elements, claim, data, and warrant but few of the second-level elements, backing, qualifier, and rebuttal n their essays. The first pronoun ‘I’ took the role of opinion-holder in students’ texts. Based on these findings, implications are made for teachers to take into account writer voice in writing classrooms of mixed ethnic groups.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. INTRODUCTION
      • Ⅱ. LITERATURE REVIEW
      • Ⅲ. METHOD
      • Ⅳ. FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
      • Ⅴ. CONCLUSION
      • Ⅰ. INTRODUCTION
      • Ⅱ. LITERATURE REVIEW
      • Ⅲ. METHOD
      • Ⅳ. FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
      • Ⅴ. CONCLUSION
      • REFERENCES
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼