RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국의 「소쇄원」과 자연미의 지향점 -「돌의 정원」과 「졸정원」과의 비교의 관점에서 = ‘Sosoewon’ in Korea and the Aesthetic of Nature

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107315170

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    I happened to visit 'The Garden of Stone' in Japan and 'Jolchungwon' in Soju, China. Some years later, I visited 'Sosoewon' in Changsung, Chollado province. I did not mean to visit there for some academic purposes from the outset.
    Later on, it occurred to me that the three gardens respectively show their own cultural characteristics of the countries. Though small and simple, 'Sosoewon' made in early 16th century seems to be regarded as a famous site representing the aesthetic characteristics of Koreans as well as the tradition of Korean 'Sonbi' culture.
    This paper did not aim at the elaborate analysis or argumentation, since it was not attempted on the academic purpose at the outset. However, the advantage of this paper may be said that it was written on the basis of the writer's actual visit to the three gardens.
    In conclusion, Chinese 'Jolchungwon' can be said to be made by an enormous engineering work in an attempt to make nature its own by bringing nature into its own garden. On the contrary, Korean 'Sosoewon,' as a part of nature, can be called a space of communication by becoming one with nature. This is a great difference between the Chinese and Korean gardens. On the other hand, whereas Japanese 'The Garden of Stone,' is a dry space to arouse a Zen meditation in a space where the sacred is cut off from the secular, Korean 'Sosoewon' can be called an open space for communication where any visitors are received with a warm welcome. This is also a great difference between the Japanese and Korean gardens. Korean sense of beauty deeply immersed in Taoism focuses on the unification of humans and nature, pursuing the natural beauty of life instead of the artificial landscape of annihilation found in the Japanese sense of beauty. As a result, regarding water, which informs the circulation of nature, as a living thing, this paper discusses the wisdom of our ancestors who made a wonderful space, 'Sosoewon,' in the center of which flows a mountain stream.
    번역하기

    I happened to visit 'The Garden of Stone' in Japan and 'Jolchungwon' in Soju, China. Some years later, I visited 'Sosoewon' in Changsung, Chollado province. I did not mean to visit there for some academic purposes from the outset. Later on, it occurre...

    I happened to visit 'The Garden of Stone' in Japan and 'Jolchungwon' in Soju, China. Some years later, I visited 'Sosoewon' in Changsung, Chollado province. I did not mean to visit there for some academic purposes from the outset.
    Later on, it occurred to me that the three gardens respectively show their own cultural characteristics of the countries. Though small and simple, 'Sosoewon' made in early 16th century seems to be regarded as a famous site representing the aesthetic characteristics of Koreans as well as the tradition of Korean 'Sonbi' culture.
    This paper did not aim at the elaborate analysis or argumentation, since it was not attempted on the academic purpose at the outset. However, the advantage of this paper may be said that it was written on the basis of the writer's actual visit to the three gardens.
    In conclusion, Chinese 'Jolchungwon' can be said to be made by an enormous engineering work in an attempt to make nature its own by bringing nature into its own garden. On the contrary, Korean 'Sosoewon,' as a part of nature, can be called a space of communication by becoming one with nature. This is a great difference between the Chinese and Korean gardens. On the other hand, whereas Japanese 'The Garden of Stone,' is a dry space to arouse a Zen meditation in a space where the sacred is cut off from the secular, Korean 'Sosoewon' can be called an open space for communication where any visitors are received with a warm welcome. This is also a great difference between the Japanese and Korean gardens. Korean sense of beauty deeply immersed in Taoism focuses on the unification of humans and nature, pursuing the natural beauty of life instead of the artificial landscape of annihilation found in the Japanese sense of beauty. As a result, regarding water, which informs the circulation of nature, as a living thing, this paper discusses the wisdom of our ancestors who made a wonderful space, 'Sosoewon,' in the center of which flows a mountain stream.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 주남철, "한국의 정원" 고려대학교 출판부 2009

    2 허균, "한국의 정원" 다른 세상 2010

    3 금장태, "한국의 선비와 선비 정신" 서울대학교 출판부 2001

    4 천득염, "한국의 명원 소쇄원" 발언 1999

    5 조요한, "한국미의 조명" 열화당 1999

    6 이어령, "하이쿠의 시학" 서정시학 2009

    7 에카르트, "조선미술사" 열화당 2003

    8 김하명, "시조선집" 조선문학예술출판사 1963

    9 김덕진, "소쇄원 사람들" 다할 미디어 2007

    10 카잔차키스, "돌의 정원" 고려원 1993

    1 주남철, "한국의 정원" 고려대학교 출판부 2009

    2 허균, "한국의 정원" 다른 세상 2010

    3 금장태, "한국의 선비와 선비 정신" 서울대학교 출판부 2001

    4 천득염, "한국의 명원 소쇄원" 발언 1999

    5 조요한, "한국미의 조명" 열화당 1999

    6 이어령, "하이쿠의 시학" 서정시학 2009

    7 에카르트, "조선미술사" 열화당 2003

    8 김하명, "시조선집" 조선문학예술출판사 1963

    9 김덕진, "소쇄원 사람들" 다할 미디어 2007

    10 카잔차키스, "돌의 정원" 고려원 1993

    11 최부득, "건축가가 찾아간 중국 정원" 미술문화 2008

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2013-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.52 0.52 0.51
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.47 0.41 0.977 0.11
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼