RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    스웨덴의 일가정양립정책 도입과 발달에 관한 연구: 노동제도와 행위자를 중심으로 = A Study on the Introduction and Development of Work-Family Policy in Sweden: Focusing on the Labor System and Actors

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108183391

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Since the 1970s, Sweden has been implementing a work-family policy, transitioning from the male bread winner model to the duel bread winner model. The state intervened in the family, which was a private domain. The purpose of this thesis is to examine how the work-family policy was introduced in Sweden and the development process in detail. In the past, studies were mainly focused on institutions, but it was pointed out that they overlooked the influence of actors surrounding policy interests. Therefore, this thesis tried to explain the development of work-family policy in Sweden by adding actors who can complement the theory while accepting the theory of the system.
    For the analysis, this thesis focused on the labor system from the institutional point of view. The Swedish labor market corresponds to a coordinated market economy according to the Varieties of Capitalism. In addition to this, actors such as corporations, labor unions, political parties, and women’s right activists were selected as factors influencing the development of work-family policy. As a result of the study, we founded that the interests of corporations, labor unions, and women’s right activists were reflected through political parties in Sweden to develop a work-family policy, which also followed the labor market system.
    In other words, in Sweden, companies wanted to prevent high-skilled women from leaving the labor market after giving birth, and the union demanded public daycare facilities to minimize the cost of care for low-skilled women. Although there was an election competition between political parties representing these voters, the work-family policy continued to expand. And it seems that the proportion of women members in the parliament also had an effect on this. In addition, it was found that these policy developments were carried out in the context of the Swedish labor system, which required highly skilled manpower, ensured employment stability, but was strictly regulated.
    번역하기

    Since the 1970s, Sweden has been implementing a work-family policy, transitioning from the male bread winner model to the duel bread winner model. The state intervened in the family, which was a private domain. The purpose of this thesis is to examine...

    Since the 1970s, Sweden has been implementing a work-family policy, transitioning from the male bread winner model to the duel bread winner model. The state intervened in the family, which was a private domain. The purpose of this thesis is to examine how the work-family policy was introduced in Sweden and the development process in detail. In the past, studies were mainly focused on institutions, but it was pointed out that they overlooked the influence of actors surrounding policy interests. Therefore, this thesis tried to explain the development of work-family policy in Sweden by adding actors who can complement the theory while accepting the theory of the system.
    For the analysis, this thesis focused on the labor system from the institutional point of view. The Swedish labor market corresponds to a coordinated market economy according to the Varieties of Capitalism. In addition to this, actors such as corporations, labor unions, political parties, and women’s right activists were selected as factors influencing the development of work-family policy. As a result of the study, we founded that the interests of corporations, labor unions, and women’s right activists were reflected through political parties in Sweden to develop a work-family policy, which also followed the labor market system.
    In other words, in Sweden, companies wanted to prevent high-skilled women from leaving the labor market after giving birth, and the union demanded public daycare facilities to minimize the cost of care for low-skilled women. Although there was an election competition between political parties representing these voters, the work-family policy continued to expand. And it seems that the proportion of women members in the parliament also had an effect on this. In addition, it was found that these policy developments were carried out in the context of the Swedish labor system, which required highly skilled manpower, ensured employment stability, but was strictly regulated.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 정이환, "현대노동시장의 정치사회학" 후마니타스 2006

    2 김일곤, "포스트포디즘적 노동시장개혁과 가족정책: 영국과 독일을 중심으로" 유로메나연구소 11 (11): 267-320, 2020

    3 조찬수, "자본주의 다양성에 대한 대안적 시각으로서의 제도진화론: 미국과 캐나다의 노동-복지 연계 비교를 중심으로" 한국국제정치학회 53 (53): 255-287, 2013

    4 김일곤, "자본주의 다양성과 경제성장 전략: 유럽의 경험을 중심으로" EU연구소 (48) : 41-68, 2018

    5 홍승아, "일가족양립정책의 국제비교연구 및 한국의 정책과제" 한국여성정책연구원 2008

    6 김은정, "일가정양립지원 정책 목표와 대상 간 정합성 연구" 한국가족학회 24 (24): 131-160, 2012

    7 윤자영, "일⋅가정 양립제도의 노동시장 효과" 한국노동연구원 2016

    8 장선화, "일-가정 균형정책과 지속가능한 발전: 스웨덴 사례를 중심으로" 한국유럽학회 36 (36): 155-186, 2018

    9 김인춘, "유럽통합과 자본주의 다양성: 북유럽과 남유럽의 ‘유럽화’ 비교" 한국유럽학회 28 (28): 175-211, 2010

    10 최성은, "스웨덴 여성 일-가정양립 경로의 역사적 형성과정에 관한 연구" 한국 스칸디나비아학회 (17) : 139-190, 2016

    1 정이환, "현대노동시장의 정치사회학" 후마니타스 2006

    2 김일곤, "포스트포디즘적 노동시장개혁과 가족정책: 영국과 독일을 중심으로" 유로메나연구소 11 (11): 267-320, 2020

    3 조찬수, "자본주의 다양성에 대한 대안적 시각으로서의 제도진화론: 미국과 캐나다의 노동-복지 연계 비교를 중심으로" 한국국제정치학회 53 (53): 255-287, 2013

    4 김일곤, "자본주의 다양성과 경제성장 전략: 유럽의 경험을 중심으로" EU연구소 (48) : 41-68, 2018

    5 홍승아, "일가족양립정책의 국제비교연구 및 한국의 정책과제" 한국여성정책연구원 2008

    6 김은정, "일가정양립지원 정책 목표와 대상 간 정합성 연구" 한국가족학회 24 (24): 131-160, 2012

    7 윤자영, "일⋅가정 양립제도의 노동시장 효과" 한국노동연구원 2016

    8 장선화, "일-가정 균형정책과 지속가능한 발전: 스웨덴 사례를 중심으로" 한국유럽학회 36 (36): 155-186, 2018

    9 김인춘, "유럽통합과 자본주의 다양성: 북유럽과 남유럽의 ‘유럽화’ 비교" 한국유럽학회 28 (28): 175-211, 2010

    10 최성은, "스웨덴 여성 일-가정양립 경로의 역사적 형성과정에 관한 연구" 한국 스칸디나비아학회 (17) : 139-190, 2016

    11 강지영, "생산레짐과 일가정양립정책이 성별 임금격차에 미치는 영향연구" 한국사회복지연구회 48 (48): 145-169, 2017

    12 신필균, "복지국가 스웨덴 : 국민의 집으로 가는 길" 후마니타스 2011

    13 김해순, "독일통일 이후 일-가족 조화정책과 여성경제활동: 성별분업을 위주로" 여성학연구소 6 (6): 7-42, 2013

    14 최정화, "독일의 일가정양립정책 결정요인에 대한 연구" 한독사회과학회 32 (32): 77-106, 2022

    15 김나연, "노동권 · 부모권 관점에서 본 영국과 스웨덴의 일-가족양립정책" 한국보육지원학회 9 (9): 51-79, 2013

    16 한광수, "‘일·생활 균형’으로의 패러다임전환을 위한 이론적 검토와 법제 정립에 대한 연구" 한국사회법학회 (31) : 147-193, 2017

    17 "https://www.ipu.org/our-impact/gender-equality"

    18 "https://stats.oecd.org"

    19 "https://eige.europa.eu/gender-statistics"

    20 Leira, Arnlaug, "Working Parents and the Welfare State: Family Change and Policy Reform in Scandinavia" Cambridge University Press 2002

    21 Morgan, Kimberley J, "Working Mothers and the Welfare State: Religion and the Politics of Working-Family Policies in Western Europe and the United States" Stanford University Press 2006

    22 Lewis, J, "Work-Family Balance, Gender and Policy" Edward Elgar 2009

    23 Hall, Peter A., "Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundation of Comparative Advantage" Oxford University Press 2001

    24 Esping-Andersen, G, "The three worlds of welfare capitalism" Princeton University Press 1990

    25 Blome, Agnes, "The Politics of Work-Family Policy Reforms in Germany and Italy" Routledge 2017

    26 Boling, Patricia, "The Politics of Work-Family Policies: Comparing Japan, France, Germany and the United States" Cambridge University Press 2015

    27 Fleckensein, Timo, "The Politics of Postindustrial Social Policy : Family Policy Reforms in Britain, Germany, South Korean, and Sweden" 47 (47): 601-630, 2014

    28 Fleckenstein, Timo, "The Politics of Idea in Welfare State Transformation : Christian Democracy and the Reform of Family Policy in Germany" 18 (18): 543-571, 2011

    29 Seeleib-Kaiser, Martin, "The Political Economy of Occupational Family Policies : Comparing Workplaces in Britain and Germany" 47 (47): 741-764, 2009

    30 Estévez-Abe, Margarita, "The Political Economy of Japan’s Low Fertility" Stanford University Press 2007

    31 Fleckenstein, Timo, "The Political Economy of Family Policies : Analyzing Family Policy Expansions in Britain and Germany" 20 (20): 1-22, 2009

    32 Fleckenstein, Timo, "The Dual Transformation of Social Protection and Human Capital: Comparing Britain and Germany" 1622-1650, 2011

    33 Lambert, Prischilla A, "The Comparative Political Economy of Parental Leave and Child Care : Evidence from Twenty OECD Countries" 15 (15): 315-344, 2008

    34 Morgan, Kimberley J, "Path shifting of the welfare state : Electoral Competition and the Expansion of Work-Family Policies in Western Europe" 65 (65): 73-115, 2013

    35 김혜원, "OECD 주요국의 여성고용정책 연구: 영국⋅캐나다⋅스웨덴⋅덴마크" 2007

    36 Blome, Agnes, "Normative Beliefs, Party Competition, and Work-Family Policy Reforms in Germany and Italy" 48 (48): 479-503, 2016

    37 Esping-Andersen, G, "Incomplete Revolution: Adapting Welfare States to Women’s New Roles" Polity 2009

    38 Dahlerup, Drude, "From a Small to a Large Minority : Women in Scandinavian Politics" 11 (11): 275-298, 1988

    39 Klammer, Ute, "Family Politics in Germany and France : The Role of Enterprises and Social Partners" 41 (41): 672-692, 2007

    40 Trévenon, Olivier, "Family Policies in OECD Countries : A Comparative Analysis" 37 (37): 57-87, 2011

    41 Ferragina, Emanuele, "Determinants of a Silent(R)evolution : Understanding the Expansion of Family Policy in Rich OECD Countries" 22 (22): 1-37, 2014

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2024 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2020-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2018-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼