RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      實存主義와 不條理演劇  :  Sartre와 Camus를 通해서 through Sartre and Camus = Existentialism and Theatre of the Absurd

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the facts that existentialism developed by Sartre is the foundation of the Theatre of the Absurd as well as the absurdity appeared first in The Myth of Sisyphus written by Camus. Sartre begins with the premise that there is no God; Consequently there are no external restraints on man and no meaning in the universe. Man, therefore, is free; he can do anything he likes, but because he existes he must do something. Sartre is able to build an ethical and social philosophy by pointing out that we do not live in this world alone. However free we may be from metaphsical restraints, our actions cannot be completely irresponsible because they have consequences for other people. Man is therefore both free and forced to act but he is also obligated to take the responsibility for his actions.
      The Absurdists, in essence, accepted the pessimistic premises of existentialism and ignored its positive side. If there is no God, no order divine and natural, then life is meaningless. Camus likened the condition of man to that of Sisyphus, who was condemned to roll a huge rock to the top of a hill. Camus saw a kind of strange triumph in the fact that Sisyphus knew he had almost made it, that at least he had struggled. The Absurdists saw only the meaninglessness of the task.
      What Camus has forced us to think is the very warrant for continued human existence and the possible resources of the human spirit in a universe that appears no longer to make sense.
      Both Sartre and Camus, in various ways, involves questions of action and ethical responsibility. Philosophyically, though both posited a meaningless world, they also tried to find a rationale for a human action. Though they argued that there was neither a natural or a divine order in the universe, they still felt that man could create a human order. In fact, it is what the Theatre of the Absurd attempts to delineate as it is.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the facts that existentialism developed by Sartre is the foundation of the Theatre of the Absurd as well as the absurdity appeared first in The Myth of Sisyphus written by Camus. Sartre begins with the premis...

      The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the facts that existentialism developed by Sartre is the foundation of the Theatre of the Absurd as well as the absurdity appeared first in The Myth of Sisyphus written by Camus. Sartre begins with the premise that there is no God; Consequently there are no external restraints on man and no meaning in the universe. Man, therefore, is free; he can do anything he likes, but because he existes he must do something. Sartre is able to build an ethical and social philosophy by pointing out that we do not live in this world alone. However free we may be from metaphsical restraints, our actions cannot be completely irresponsible because they have consequences for other people. Man is therefore both free and forced to act but he is also obligated to take the responsibility for his actions.
      The Absurdists, in essence, accepted the pessimistic premises of existentialism and ignored its positive side. If there is no God, no order divine and natural, then life is meaningless. Camus likened the condition of man to that of Sisyphus, who was condemned to roll a huge rock to the top of a hill. Camus saw a kind of strange triumph in the fact that Sisyphus knew he had almost made it, that at least he had struggled. The Absurdists saw only the meaninglessness of the task.
      What Camus has forced us to think is the very warrant for continued human existence and the possible resources of the human spirit in a universe that appears no longer to make sense.
      Both Sartre and Camus, in various ways, involves questions of action and ethical responsibility. Philosophyically, though both posited a meaningless world, they also tried to find a rationale for a human action. Though they argued that there was neither a natural or a divine order in the universe, they still felt that man could create a human order. In fact, it is what the Theatre of the Absurd attempts to delineate as it is.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 實存主義
      • 1. Sartre의 思想
      • 2. Sartre의 文學
      • Ⅲ. 不條理
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 實存主義
      • 1. Sartre의 思想
      • 2. Sartre의 文學
      • Ⅲ. 不條理
      • 1. Camus의 思想
      • 2. Camus의 文學
      • Ⅳ. 결론
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼