RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      안동김씨 김방경가문의 족보 간행과 변천 = The Publication of the Family Genealogy of Kim Bang-gyeong from the Andong Kim Clan and Changes Thereto

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104460618

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The oldest family genealogy of the Kim Bang-gyeong from the Andong Kim Clan, the Gyeongjinbo was published in 1580(13th year of King Seonjo). Although Kim Ik was asked to write the first draft of the family genealogy in 1519, his subsequent involvement in political upheavals ensured that it was not completed during his lifetime. The first actual genealogy of the Andong Kim clan was published in 1580 by Kim Ik’s grandson.
      The Gyeongjinbo was based on the son’s family-oriented compilation system. Contrary to the Seonghwabo and Gajeongbo which included all the descendants regardless of whether they were those of the sons or daughters, the Gyeongjinbo recorded persons with the same surname in great details while only recording the descendants from daughters’ families in a haphazard manner. However, the children were recorded in the order of their births, with the emphasis being on the order of birth rather than whether they were male or female. Furthermore, the fact that there were very few instances in which adoption was pursued when there were no descendants shows that the succession of the family line through adoption was not yet emphasized.
      The Gimibo was published 159 years after the compilation of the Gyeongjinbo. Unlike the Gyeongjinbo, the Gimibo was prepared in a separate volume by family lineage due to the extension of the recorded descendants. The Gimibo included more personal information than the Gyeongjinbo. In addition, the Gimibo abided by the principle of separating people into those that belonged to the same and different clans by not inserting the surname of those who were from the same clan. The children were recorded based on the son-first daughter-later principle. Furthermore, legitimate and illegitimate children were clearly distinguished from one another, with entries showing whether a son was a legitimate or illegitimate child.
      The goals behind the publication of the Gyeongjinbo and Gimibo were respect for ancestors and the desire to continue the clan. While continuance of the family clan was not emphasized in the Gyeongjinbo, the separation of the family lineage and harmony between the relatives were emphasized in the Gimibo. The two genealogies exhibited similarities in terms of their differentiation of the family clan by limiting the recording scope of daughters’ descendants.
      In conclusion, the Gyeongjinbo was a family genealogy that reflected the son’s descendants and the son-oriented notion of kinship rather than a ‘genealogy of the descendants’ that included all descendants without separating them into sons’ and daughters’ descendants. The fact that the children were recorded in the order of births and that adoption was not implemented means that the work can be regarded as a family genealogy during the transition from ‘genealogy of the descendants’ to ‘genealogy of the family clan’. However, the compilation method of family genealogies based on the son’s descendants and son-oriented system had become entrenched by the time the Gimibo was compiled. The separation of illegitimate sons was also clearly implemented. The Gimibo was a typical paternal-line based ‘genealogy of the family clan’ that appeared in late Joseon.
      번역하기

      The oldest family genealogy of the Kim Bang-gyeong from the Andong Kim Clan, the Gyeongjinbo was published in 1580(13th year of King Seonjo). Although Kim Ik was asked to write the first draft of the family genealogy in 1519, his subsequent involvemen...

      The oldest family genealogy of the Kim Bang-gyeong from the Andong Kim Clan, the Gyeongjinbo was published in 1580(13th year of King Seonjo). Although Kim Ik was asked to write the first draft of the family genealogy in 1519, his subsequent involvement in political upheavals ensured that it was not completed during his lifetime. The first actual genealogy of the Andong Kim clan was published in 1580 by Kim Ik’s grandson.
      The Gyeongjinbo was based on the son’s family-oriented compilation system. Contrary to the Seonghwabo and Gajeongbo which included all the descendants regardless of whether they were those of the sons or daughters, the Gyeongjinbo recorded persons with the same surname in great details while only recording the descendants from daughters’ families in a haphazard manner. However, the children were recorded in the order of their births, with the emphasis being on the order of birth rather than whether they were male or female. Furthermore, the fact that there were very few instances in which adoption was pursued when there were no descendants shows that the succession of the family line through adoption was not yet emphasized.
      The Gimibo was published 159 years after the compilation of the Gyeongjinbo. Unlike the Gyeongjinbo, the Gimibo was prepared in a separate volume by family lineage due to the extension of the recorded descendants. The Gimibo included more personal information than the Gyeongjinbo. In addition, the Gimibo abided by the principle of separating people into those that belonged to the same and different clans by not inserting the surname of those who were from the same clan. The children were recorded based on the son-first daughter-later principle. Furthermore, legitimate and illegitimate children were clearly distinguished from one another, with entries showing whether a son was a legitimate or illegitimate child.
      The goals behind the publication of the Gyeongjinbo and Gimibo were respect for ancestors and the desire to continue the clan. While continuance of the family clan was not emphasized in the Gyeongjinbo, the separation of the family lineage and harmony between the relatives were emphasized in the Gimibo. The two genealogies exhibited similarities in terms of their differentiation of the family clan by limiting the recording scope of daughters’ descendants.
      In conclusion, the Gyeongjinbo was a family genealogy that reflected the son’s descendants and the son-oriented notion of kinship rather than a ‘genealogy of the descendants’ that included all descendants without separating them into sons’ and daughters’ descendants. The fact that the children were recorded in the order of births and that adoption was not implemented means that the work can be regarded as a family genealogy during the transition from ‘genealogy of the descendants’ to ‘genealogy of the family clan’. However, the compilation method of family genealogies based on the son’s descendants and son-oriented system had become entrenched by the time the Gimibo was compiled. The separation of illegitimate sons was also clearly implemented. The Gimibo was a typical paternal-line based ‘genealogy of the family clan’ that appeared in late Joseon.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 노명호, "한국사 연구와 족보, In 한국사시민강좌 제24집" 일조각 1999

      2 이정란, "족보의 자녀 수록방식을 통해서 본 여말선초 족보의 편찬 배경 -『安東權氏成化譜』 · 『文化柳氏嘉靖譜』를 중심으로-" 한국중세사학회 (25) : 117-155, 2008

      3 송찬식, "족보의 간행, In 한국사시민강좌 제24집" 일조각 1999

      4 이수건, "족보와 양반의식, In 한국사시민강좌 제24집" 일조각 1999

      5 김용선, "족보 이전의 가계기록, In 한국사시민강좌 제24집" 일조각 1999

      6 오영선, "조선초기 家系記錄에 대한 일고찰" 7 (7): 2001

      7 차장섭, "조선시대 족보의 유형과 특징" 역사교육학회 44 (44): 239-278, 2010

      8 李樹健, "조선시대 身分史관련 자료의 비판-姓貫家系人物관련 僞造 資料와 僞書를 중심으로-" 14 : 1998

      9 백승종, "위조 족보의 유행, In 한국사시민강좌 제24집" 일조각 1999

      10 남인국, "원 간섭기 지배세력의 존재양태-안동김씨 김방경계를 중심으로-" 역사교육학회 (38) : 233-271, 2007

      1 노명호, "한국사 연구와 족보, In 한국사시민강좌 제24집" 일조각 1999

      2 이정란, "족보의 자녀 수록방식을 통해서 본 여말선초 족보의 편찬 배경 -『安東權氏成化譜』 · 『文化柳氏嘉靖譜』를 중심으로-" 한국중세사학회 (25) : 117-155, 2008

      3 송찬식, "족보의 간행, In 한국사시민강좌 제24집" 일조각 1999

      4 이수건, "족보와 양반의식, In 한국사시민강좌 제24집" 일조각 1999

      5 김용선, "족보 이전의 가계기록, In 한국사시민강좌 제24집" 일조각 1999

      6 오영선, "조선초기 家系記錄에 대한 일고찰" 7 (7): 2001

      7 차장섭, "조선시대 족보의 유형과 특징" 역사교육학회 44 (44): 239-278, 2010

      8 李樹健, "조선시대 身分史관련 자료의 비판-姓貫家系人物관련 僞造 資料와 僞書를 중심으로-" 14 : 1998

      9 백승종, "위조 족보의 유행, In 한국사시민강좌 제24집" 일조각 1999

      10 남인국, "원 간섭기 지배세력의 존재양태-안동김씨 김방경계를 중심으로-" 역사교육학회 (38) : 233-271, 2007

      11 김난옥, "여말선초 先祖意識과 족보편찬의 신분적 배경" 한국중세사학회 (25) : 59-88, 2008

      12 金龍善, "高麗時代의 家系記錄과 ‘族譜’, In 고려금석문연구" 일조각 2004

      13 宋俊浩, "韓國의 氏族制에 있어서의 本貫및 始祖의 問題-韓中兩國의 傳統社會를 比較하는 立場에서 그 性格을 究明한다-" 109 : 1986

      14 宋俊浩, "韓國에 있어서의 家系記錄의 歷史와 그 解釋, In 朝鮮社會史硏究" 일조각 1987

      15 정병완, "韓國族譜의 舊譜序比較硏究" 6 : 1986

      16 鄭炳浣, "韓國族譜舊譜序集" 아세아문화사 1987

      17 李樹健, "朝鮮前期姓貫體系와 族譜의 편찬체제, In 朴永錫敎授華甲紀念韓國史學論叢(上)" 탐구당 1992

      18 심승구, "朝鮮初期族譜의 刊行形態에 관한 硏究" 89 : 2000

      19 崔在錫, "族譜에 있어서의 派의 형성, In 韓國家族制 度史硏究" 일지사 1983

      20 宋俊浩, "族譜를 통해서 본 韓中兩國의 전통사회, In 李丙燾博士九旬紀 念韓國史學論叢" 지식산업사 1987

      21 權寧大, "成化譜攷" 20 : 1981

      22 陸貞任, "宋元代 族譜修撰과 그 社會史的 意義" 고려사학회 (22) : 233-270, 2006

      23 宮嶋博史, "『안동권씨성화보』를 통해서 본 한국 족보의 구조적 특성" 대동문화연구원 (62) : 201-241, 2008

      24 권기석, "15∼17세기 族譜의 編制방식과 성격-序跋文의 내용 분석을 중심으로-" 30 : 2007

      25 EDWARD W. WAGNER, "1476年安東權氏族譜와 1565年文化柳氏族 譜-그 性格과 意味에 대한 考察-" 15 : 1989

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.92 0.92 0.81
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.78 0.81 1.498 0.27
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼