RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Evaluation of peri-implant bone defects on cone-beam computed tomography and the diagnostic accuracy of detecting these defects on panoramic images

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109867322

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Purpose: This study was conducted to identify the typical sites and patterns of peri-implant bone defects on cone- beam computed tomography (CBCT) images, as well as to evaluate the detectability of the identified bone defects on panoramic images.
      Materials and Methods: The study population included 114 patients with a total of 367 implant fixtures. CBCT images were used to assess the presence or absence of bone defects around each implant fixture at the mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual sites. Based on the number of defect sites, the presentations of the peri-implant bone defects were categorized into 3 patterns: 1 site, 2 or 3 sites, and circumferential bone defects. Two observers independently evaluated the presence or absence of bone defects on panoramic images. The bone defect detection rate on these images was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis.
      Results: Of the 367 implants studied, 167 (45.5%) had at least 1 site with a confirmed bone defect. The most common type of defect was circumferential, affecting 107 of the 167 implants (64.1%). Implants were most frequently placed in the mandibular molar region. The prevalence of bone defects was greatest in the maxillary premolar and mandibular molar regions. The highest kappa value was associated with the mandibular premolar region.
      Conclusion: The typical bone defect pattern observed was a circumferential defect surrounding the implant. The detection rate was generally higher in the molar region than in the anterior region. However, the capacity to detect partial bone defects using panoramic imaging was determined to be poor.
      번역하기

      Purpose: This study was conducted to identify the typical sites and patterns of peri-implant bone defects on cone- beam computed tomography (CBCT) images, as well as to evaluate the detectability of the identified bone defects on panoramic images. Mat...

      Purpose: This study was conducted to identify the typical sites and patterns of peri-implant bone defects on cone- beam computed tomography (CBCT) images, as well as to evaluate the detectability of the identified bone defects on panoramic images.
      Materials and Methods: The study population included 114 patients with a total of 367 implant fixtures. CBCT images were used to assess the presence or absence of bone defects around each implant fixture at the mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual sites. Based on the number of defect sites, the presentations of the peri-implant bone defects were categorized into 3 patterns: 1 site, 2 or 3 sites, and circumferential bone defects. Two observers independently evaluated the presence or absence of bone defects on panoramic images. The bone defect detection rate on these images was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis.
      Results: Of the 367 implants studied, 167 (45.5%) had at least 1 site with a confirmed bone defect. The most common type of defect was circumferential, affecting 107 of the 167 implants (64.1%). Implants were most frequently placed in the mandibular molar region. The prevalence of bone defects was greatest in the maxillary premolar and mandibular molar regions. The highest kappa value was associated with the mandibular premolar region.
      Conclusion: The typical bone defect pattern observed was a circumferential defect surrounding the implant. The detection rate was generally higher in the molar region than in the anterior region. However, the capacity to detect partial bone defects using panoramic imaging was determined to be poor.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Bornstein MM, "Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry : current concepts, indications and limitations for clinical practice and research" 73 : 51-72, 2017

      2 Landis JR, "The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data" 33 : 159-174, 1977

      3 Zechner W, "Rotational panoramic versus intraoral rectangular radiographs for evaluation of peri-implant bone loss in the anterior atrophic mandible" 18 : 873-878, 2003

      4 Rees TD, "Radiographic interpretation of periodontal osseous lesions" 32 : 141-153, 1971

      5 Merheb J, "Prediction of implant loss and marginal bone loss by analysis of dental panoramic radiographs" 30 : 372-377, 2015

      6 Tyndall DA, "Position statement of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography" 113 : 817-826, 2012

      7 Schwarz F, "Peri-implantitis" 45 (45): S246-S266, 2018

      8 Heitz-Mayfield LJA, "Peri-implant mucositis" 45 (45): S237-S245, 2018

      9 Renvert S, "Peri-implant health, peri-implant mucositis, and peri-implantitis : case definitions and diagnostic considerations" 89 (89): S304-S312, 2018

      10 Serino G, "Outcome of surgical treatment of peri-implantitis : results from a 2-year prospective clinical study in humans" 22 : 1214-1220, 2011

      1 Bornstein MM, "Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry : current concepts, indications and limitations for clinical practice and research" 73 : 51-72, 2017

      2 Landis JR, "The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data" 33 : 159-174, 1977

      3 Zechner W, "Rotational panoramic versus intraoral rectangular radiographs for evaluation of peri-implant bone loss in the anterior atrophic mandible" 18 : 873-878, 2003

      4 Rees TD, "Radiographic interpretation of periodontal osseous lesions" 32 : 141-153, 1971

      5 Merheb J, "Prediction of implant loss and marginal bone loss by analysis of dental panoramic radiographs" 30 : 372-377, 2015

      6 Tyndall DA, "Position statement of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography" 113 : 817-826, 2012

      7 Schwarz F, "Peri-implantitis" 45 (45): S246-S266, 2018

      8 Heitz-Mayfield LJA, "Peri-implant mucositis" 45 (45): S237-S245, 2018

      9 Renvert S, "Peri-implant health, peri-implant mucositis, and peri-implantitis : case definitions and diagnostic considerations" 89 (89): S304-S312, 2018

      10 Serino G, "Outcome of surgical treatment of peri-implantitis : results from a 2-year prospective clinical study in humans" 22 : 1214-1220, 2011

      11 Schulze RK, "On cone-beam computed tomography artifacts induced by titanium implants" 21 : 100-107, 2010

      12 Patel S, "New dimensions in endodontic imaging: part 1. Conventional and alternative radiographic systems" 42 : 447-462, 2009

      13 Monje A, "Morphology and severity of peri-implantitis bone defects" 21 : 635-643, 2019

      14 Benic GI, "In vitro assessment of artifacts induced by titanium dental implants in cone beam computed tomography" 24 : 378-383, 2013

      15 Binon PP, "Implants and components : entering the new millennium" 15 : 76-94, 2000

      16 Riecke B, "Impact of malpositioning on panoramic radiography in implant dentistry" 19 : 781-790, 2015

      17 Schwarz F, "Impact of defect configuration on the clinical outcome following surgical regenerative therapy of peri-implantitis" 37 : 449-455, 2010

      18 Harris D, "E.A.O. guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry a consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration in Trinity College Dublin" 13 : 566-570, 2002

      19 Harris D, "E.A.O. guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry 2011. A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration at the Medical University of Warsaw" 23 : 1243-1253, 2012

      20 Kim MJ, "Developing evidence-based clinical imaging guidelines of justification for radiographic examination after dental implant installation" 20 : 102-, 2020

      21 Sirin Y, "Detection of crestal radiolucencies around dental implants : an in vitro experimental study" 70 : 1540-1550, 2012

      22 Geraets WG, "Detecting bone loss along dental implants by subtraction of panoramic radiographs" 23 : 861-865, 2012

      23 Suomalainen A, "Dentomaxillofacial imaging with panoramic views and cone beam CT" 6 : 1-16, 2015

      24 Heuberer S, "Dental implants are a viable alternative for compensating ologodontia in adolescents" 26 : e22-e27, 2015

      25 Zitzmann NU, "Definition and prevalence of peri-implant diseases" 35 (35): 286-291, 2008

      26 Pelekos G, "Defect morphology, bone thickness, exposure settings and examiner experience affect the diagnostic accuracy of standardized digital periapical radiographic images but not of cone beam computed tomography in the detection of peri-implant osseous defects : an in vitro study" 46 : 1294-1302, 2019

      27 Lam EW, "Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning" 74 : 42-46, 1995

      28 Schwarz F, "Comparison of naturally occurring and ligature-induced peri-implantitis bone defects in humans and dogs" 18 : 161-170, 2007

      29 Wehner C, "Characteristics and frequency distribution of bone defect configurations in peri-implantitis lesions-a series of 193 cases" 23 : 178-188, 2021

      30 Pietrokovski J, "Alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extraction" 17 : 21-27, 1967

      31 García-García M, "Accuracy of periapical radiography in assessing bone level in implants affected by peri-implantitis : a cross-sectional study" 43 : 85-91, 2016

      32 Ritter L, "Accuracy of peri-implant bone evaluation using cone beam CT, digital intra-oral radiographs and histology" 43 : 20130088-, 2014

      33 Golubovic V, "Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography to assess the configuration and extent of ligature-induced peri-implantitis defects. A pilot study" 16 : 349-354, 2012

      34 장희원 ; 강정경 ; 이기 ; 이용상 ; 박필규, "A retrospective study on related factors affecting the survival rate of dental implants" 3 : 204-215, 2011

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼