RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    문법 평가의 현황과 과제 -국가 수준 학업 성취도 평가를 중심으로 = The State and Tasks of Grammar Evaluation Today -With a Focus on National Level Achievement Tests-

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study attempts to set a direction for grammar evaluation by examining how the evaluation has been made in National Level Achievement Tests. In the second section, the current state of grammar evaluation has been investigated from the viewpoint of learners achievement level. This section explores various aspects of the percentage of correct answers according to achievement standards and discusses achievement standards and evaluation questions that learners have trouble with. Through this review, what has been identified is achievement standards and evaluation questions with different than expected results and exceptionally low percentages of correct answers. In order to incorporate positive feedback effects on the grammar evaluation, on completion of this study, what is found to be required is the development of evaluation standards and teaching-learning contents, or the desirable changes of the contemporary forming methods of the evaluation questions. In the third section, the way in which grammar evaluation principle has been realized is considered through two aspects of linguistic materials and use of grammatical terms. The principle of language material practices has been carried out formally in the way of increasing textual materials, but functionally these materials have not met needs. The principle in using grammatical terms based on learners level has been performed in the way of limiting their use, and has manifested in the way of excluding grammatical terms included in teaching-learning courses. It can be seen that grammar evaluation principle has not properly fulfilled its purpose in the actual field of evaluation.
    번역하기

    This study attempts to set a direction for grammar evaluation by examining how the evaluation has been made in National Level Achievement Tests. In the second section, the current state of grammar evaluation has been investigated from the viewpoint of...

    This study attempts to set a direction for grammar evaluation by examining how the evaluation has been made in National Level Achievement Tests. In the second section, the current state of grammar evaluation has been investigated from the viewpoint of learners achievement level. This section explores various aspects of the percentage of correct answers according to achievement standards and discusses achievement standards and evaluation questions that learners have trouble with. Through this review, what has been identified is achievement standards and evaluation questions with different than expected results and exceptionally low percentages of correct answers. In order to incorporate positive feedback effects on the grammar evaluation, on completion of this study, what is found to be required is the development of evaluation standards and teaching-learning contents, or the desirable changes of the contemporary forming methods of the evaluation questions. In the third section, the way in which grammar evaluation principle has been realized is considered through two aspects of linguistic materials and use of grammatical terms. The principle of language material practices has been carried out formally in the way of increasing textual materials, but functionally these materials have not met needs. The principle in using grammatical terms based on learners level has been performed in the way of limiting their use, and has manifested in the way of excluding grammatical terms included in teaching-learning courses. It can be seen that grammar evaluation principle has not properly fulfilled its purpose in the actual field of evaluation.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼