RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    도로하자로 인한 손해배상에 관한 연구 = (A) Study on the Compensation for Damages Caused by Defects in the Public Roads

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76566488

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In the administrative law, roads are public objects which are commonly used for public purposes so their legal relationship is regulated by the public law. Especially, it is legally stipulated that damages caused by any defects in the installation or the management of roads should be handled in accordance with the State Tort Liability Act. At present, the cases of national compensation for the defects of roads have several problems in some aspects. First, theoretically, there is sharp confrontation because it is seen that the substantial law of the cases of national compensation is based on only the article 5 of the State Tort Liability Act, disregarding the article 2 of the Act. Any defect of roads can be seen as a problem of the article 5 of the Act in that the roads are public objects, but from the viewpoint of the subject of public officials who install or manage the public object of roads, it can be a problem of the article 2 of the Act so both the article 2 and the article 5 are applicable. That is, the significance of the defects based on the article 5 of the Act has no influence on existence and inexistence of damages caused by the defects of roads even though it is interpreted by the objective theory. In terms of practical affairs, the cases of damages caused by the defects of roads are handled as a civil suit, not parteiprozess, based on the public law so they have a tendency of practical affairs familiar with the suit for damages, such as liability with fault. That is, in the liability for damages caused by the defects of roads, there is a tendency that liability with fault and liability without fault are not strictly separated, and a subjective aspect, such as a possibility of road managers` foresight or evasion, is seen as an element for judgment of a flaw. Secondly, the defects of roads are too strictly acknowledged, through which the intention of the State Tort Liability Act to save people`s rights and interests tends to be disregarded. National compensation for the defects of roads has a lot of characteristics compared with the general national compensation cases. First, the same type of accidents is continuously repeated so it is possible to pattern the defects. That is, it means that it becomes possible to apply the existing theoretical confrontation, which has remained in the abstract discussion when the defects of public institution are mentioned, to a concrete flaw pattern. This paper intends to suggest a standard for the cases related with the defects of roads by patterning and analyzing each case discussed in Korea. The work of patterning the defects of roads needs to be continued in the future, through which it will be necessary to establish the standards for the judgment of defects by flaw pattern. Secondly, the suit for road defects is a technical and professional field same as the suit for medical faults or the suit for environmental pollution so it tends to excessively strictly request a victim to prove a fault in the installation or the management of roads. Therefore, in terms of the liability for proof, easing or reducing the liability for proof, which has been discussed in other fields of suits, needs to be actively introduced to the suit for road defects. The suit for road defects has the characteristics of parteiprozess, but it is handled as a civil suit. However, the civil suit is short of the speciality in the field of the public law (road management relationship) or of the process against the administrative suits so it has some problems in saving a victim`s rights and interests. In this respect, it will be necessary to change the current practical affairs of the suit to parteiprozess. In the revision draft of the administrative suit law which has been recently announced to be legislated, an article of exemplifying a pattern of national compensation, damages caused by illegal disposition, as parteiprozess has been newly prepared. However, this article doesn`t contain all the patterns of nat
    번역하기

    In the administrative law, roads are public objects which are commonly used for public purposes so their legal relationship is regulated by the public law. Especially, it is legally stipulated that damages caused by any defects in the installation or ...

    In the administrative law, roads are public objects which are commonly used for public purposes so their legal relationship is regulated by the public law. Especially, it is legally stipulated that damages caused by any defects in the installation or the management of roads should be handled in accordance with the State Tort Liability Act. At present, the cases of national compensation for the defects of roads have several problems in some aspects. First, theoretically, there is sharp confrontation because it is seen that the substantial law of the cases of national compensation is based on only the article 5 of the State Tort Liability Act, disregarding the article 2 of the Act. Any defect of roads can be seen as a problem of the article 5 of the Act in that the roads are public objects, but from the viewpoint of the subject of public officials who install or manage the public object of roads, it can be a problem of the article 2 of the Act so both the article 2 and the article 5 are applicable. That is, the significance of the defects based on the article 5 of the Act has no influence on existence and inexistence of damages caused by the defects of roads even though it is interpreted by the objective theory. In terms of practical affairs, the cases of damages caused by the defects of roads are handled as a civil suit, not parteiprozess, based on the public law so they have a tendency of practical affairs familiar with the suit for damages, such as liability with fault. That is, in the liability for damages caused by the defects of roads, there is a tendency that liability with fault and liability without fault are not strictly separated, and a subjective aspect, such as a possibility of road managers` foresight or evasion, is seen as an element for judgment of a flaw. Secondly, the defects of roads are too strictly acknowledged, through which the intention of the State Tort Liability Act to save people`s rights and interests tends to be disregarded. National compensation for the defects of roads has a lot of characteristics compared with the general national compensation cases. First, the same type of accidents is continuously repeated so it is possible to pattern the defects. That is, it means that it becomes possible to apply the existing theoretical confrontation, which has remained in the abstract discussion when the defects of public institution are mentioned, to a concrete flaw pattern. This paper intends to suggest a standard for the cases related with the defects of roads by patterning and analyzing each case discussed in Korea. The work of patterning the defects of roads needs to be continued in the future, through which it will be necessary to establish the standards for the judgment of defects by flaw pattern. Secondly, the suit for road defects is a technical and professional field same as the suit for medical faults or the suit for environmental pollution so it tends to excessively strictly request a victim to prove a fault in the installation or the management of roads. Therefore, in terms of the liability for proof, easing or reducing the liability for proof, which has been discussed in other fields of suits, needs to be actively introduced to the suit for road defects. The suit for road defects has the characteristics of parteiprozess, but it is handled as a civil suit. However, the civil suit is short of the speciality in the field of the public law (road management relationship) or of the process against the administrative suits so it has some problems in saving a victim`s rights and interests. In this respect, it will be necessary to change the current practical affairs of the suit to parteiprozess. In the revision draft of the administrative suit law which has been recently announced to be legislated, an article of exemplifying a pattern of national compensation, damages caused by illegal disposition, as parteiprozess has been newly prepared. However, this article doesn`t contain all the patterns of nat

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼