RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    대진과 심대윤의 이욕관 문제 = Daejin and Sim Dae-yun`s Attitudes toward Li(理) and desire

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A45028384

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Daejin(1724~1777), the prominent leader of Chinese Hwan party in 18th century, and Sim Dae-yun(1806~1872), a great scholar on Chinese Classics of Korea in 19th Centuryare the most against neo-Confucian order system and try to overcome it. Daejin was against new-Confucianism with `以理殺人` and Sim Dae-yun criticizes that the neo-Confucian ideas, the ruling principles for six, seven hundreds years in Chosun dynasty, has bad effect on the common people. The common point between these two scholars is that they are against neo-Confucianism and try to overcome it. They criticize the ideological and subjective comment attitudes of exegetical studies and Song studies, assert objective research methods and also disapprove metaphysical absolute truth system and `理在氣先` and secure universality of `Li` and superity of `Qi(氣)`. They diagnose that the premodem coordinate structure of `Li` and desire established by Two Cheong brothers and Chuzi has historical ill effects and errors therefore need to re-establish modern unified recognition structure of `Li` and desire. It was a attempt to convert `Li` order system as neo-Confucian essence into a system centered `Qi(氣)`. Daejin, especially, connecting `li` and desire isssue with the rule of right, defines that `man`s preference for property and sex is an intrinsic attribute and it is the very `Li` being with common people. Sim emphasis that the preference for fame and wealth is `天命之性`, `性卽利` and also `與人同利`, 公利=義 to prevent this from running into private preference. Following after them, the absoluteness of ideological neo-Confucianism, the fetter of instinct desire for matters for six or seven years, has weakened in China and Korea, at the same time these nations started to enter into modem nations in earnest as western Capitalism came after 18th century. Daejin`s philosophical system of `氣化之陰陽, 生 生不息` `性卽欲`, `與百姓同之` affects Hong Su-jeon(洪秀全)`s peace haven revolution thought and Son Jung-san(孫中山)`s revolution democratic ideas, sim Dae-yun`s `氣動`, `性卽利`, `與人同利` affects the popular movement and democracy such as Donghak(東學) revolution (1862) and the Kap-o Reform ideas of 1894. In 18th century, the establishment of unified `Li` and desire structure of Daejin, in China, and Sim Dae-yun, in Korea, nourishes the development and extension of modem Capitalism and democracy.
    번역하기

    Daejin(1724~1777), the prominent leader of Chinese Hwan party in 18th century, and Sim Dae-yun(1806~1872), a great scholar on Chinese Classics of Korea in 19th Centuryare the most against neo-Confucian order system and try to overcome it. Daejin was a...

    Daejin(1724~1777), the prominent leader of Chinese Hwan party in 18th century, and Sim Dae-yun(1806~1872), a great scholar on Chinese Classics of Korea in 19th Centuryare the most against neo-Confucian order system and try to overcome it. Daejin was against new-Confucianism with `以理殺人` and Sim Dae-yun criticizes that the neo-Confucian ideas, the ruling principles for six, seven hundreds years in Chosun dynasty, has bad effect on the common people. The common point between these two scholars is that they are against neo-Confucianism and try to overcome it. They criticize the ideological and subjective comment attitudes of exegetical studies and Song studies, assert objective research methods and also disapprove metaphysical absolute truth system and `理在氣先` and secure universality of `Li` and superity of `Qi(氣)`. They diagnose that the premodem coordinate structure of `Li` and desire established by Two Cheong brothers and Chuzi has historical ill effects and errors therefore need to re-establish modern unified recognition structure of `Li` and desire. It was a attempt to convert `Li` order system as neo-Confucian essence into a system centered `Qi(氣)`. Daejin, especially, connecting `li` and desire isssue with the rule of right, defines that `man`s preference for property and sex is an intrinsic attribute and it is the very `Li` being with common people. Sim emphasis that the preference for fame and wealth is `天命之性`, `性卽利` and also `與人同利`, 公利=義 to prevent this from running into private preference. Following after them, the absoluteness of ideological neo-Confucianism, the fetter of instinct desire for matters for six or seven years, has weakened in China and Korea, at the same time these nations started to enter into modem nations in earnest as western Capitalism came after 18th century. Daejin`s philosophical system of `氣化之陰陽, 生 生不息` `性卽欲`, `與百姓同之` affects Hong Su-jeon(洪秀全)`s peace haven revolution thought and Son Jung-san(孫中山)`s revolution democratic ideas, sim Dae-yun`s `氣動`, `性卽利`, `與人同利` affects the popular movement and democracy such as Donghak(東學) revolution (1862) and the Kap-o Reform ideas of 1894. In 18th century, the establishment of unified `Li` and desire structure of Daejin, in China, and Sim Dae-yun, in Korea, nourishes the development and extension of modem Capitalism and democracy.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼