RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      보행에 제한이 있는 뇌졸중 환자들의 한국어 번안 기능적 앉기 검사의 신뢰도와 타당도 = The Reliability and Validity of the Korean version of Function in Sitting Test in Patients with Stroke who are limited walking ability

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      국문 초록 (Abstract)

      국내에서 뇌졸중 환자들의 앉기 균형 평가에 관한 표준화된 평가 도구는 거의 없다. 본 연구의 목적은 기능적 앉기 검사(Function In Sitting Test, FIST)를 한글로 번안하여 보행에 제한이 있는 뇌졸...

      국내에서 뇌졸중 환자들의 앉기 균형 평가에 관한 표준화된 평가 도구는 거의 없다. 본 연구의 목적은 기능적 앉기 검사(Function In Sitting Test, FIST)를 한글로 번안하여 보행에 제한이 있는 뇌졸중 환자들의 앉기 균형 평가의 신뢰도와 타당도를 검증하고자 하였다. 피 실험자 43명을 대상으로 FIST 개별 항목과 총점의 측정자간 신뢰도(Inter-rater reliability)는 가중치 카파 계수(Weighted kappa coefficient)와 급간 내 상관계수(Intra class coefficient, ICC<sub>2,1</sub>)를 이용하였다. FIST 개별 항목과 총점간의 관련성은 스피어만 상관 계수(Spearman correlation coefficient)를 이용하였고, 문항 내적 일치도는 크론바 알파 계수(Cronbach`s α coefficient)로 구하였다. 또한 절대적 신뢰도 지수인 FIST의 표준 측정 오차(Standard error measurement, SEM)와 최소 감지 변화(Minimal detectable change, MDC)를 구하였다. FIST의 동시 타당도는 체간 조절 검사(Trunk Control Test, TCT), 뇌졸중 자세 평가 척도(Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke, PASS), 수정된 델지수(Modified Barthel Index, MBI)를 이용하여 스피어만 상관 계수를 구하였다. 본 연구 결과 FIST 1∼14번 개별 항목의 가중치 카파 계수는 .80∼.96, FIST 총점의 ICC=.99(.98∼.99)이었다. FIST 개별 항목과 총점간의 관련성은 r=.82∼.93이었고, FIST의 문항 내적 일치도는 .97로 높은 수준이었다. FIST의 SEM은 0.95점(평균 점수 29.95점의 10%미만), MDC는 2.63점으로(FIST평가 최고 점수인44점의 20%미만)신뢰할만하였다. FIST의 동시 타당도는 TCT(r=.85), PASS(r=.82), MBI(r=.81)와는 매우 높은 상관관계가 있었다. FIST 평가는 보행에 제한이 있는 뇌졸중 환자들의 앉기 균형을 평가 하는데 매우 적합한 것으로 확인되었다. 따라서 FIST는 임상에서 앉기 균형 평가에서 시작하여 서기자세 균형과 보행에 필요한 동적 균형 능력을 평가하는데 보조적인 평가 방법이 될 수 있을 것이다.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In Korea, there is no standardized assessment tool for sitting balance assessment of stroke patients. The purpose of this study was to adopt FIST into Korean in order to verify the reliability and validity of a sitting balance assessment of stroke pat...

      In Korea, there is no standardized assessment tool for sitting balance assessment of stroke patients. The purpose of this study was to adopt FIST into Korean in order to verify the reliability and validity of a sitting balance assessment of stroke patients who had limited walking abilities. The study was held with 43 subjects who were measured using the FIST individual item score and Inter-rater reliability with the Weight Kappa Coefficient and Intra Class Coefficient (ICC2,1). The relevance between the individual items of FIST and total scores was calculated through Cronbach`s a coefficient. In addition, absolute reliability indexes including the Standard Error Measurement(SEM) of FIST and Minimal Detectable Change(MDC) were measured. Concurrent Validity of the FIST Trunk Control Test(TCT), Postural Assessment Scale(PAS) for Stroke, Modified Barthel Index(MBI) were measured in relation to the Spearman correlation coefficient. According to this study, the Weighted Kappa coefficient of the FIST individual items 1-14 was 0.80 to 0.96 times, and the FIST total score was ICC=.99 (.98~.99). The relevance of the FIST score and individual items was r=.82~.93 which showed high relevant levels between the two items. The Crohn`s alpha coefficient of FIST bar was high at 0.97. The SEM of FIST was 0.95 points and was less than 10%(average 29.95score). The MDC was fairly reliable by only being 2.63 points, less than 20%(FIST highest rating 44score). The concurrent validity of FIST has been confirmed to have a very high correlation with the TCT(r=.85), PASS(r=.82) and MBI(r=.81). The FIST assessment has been found to be very suitable for a sitting balance evaluation of stroke patients with limited walking. Therefore, FIST could be useful as a secondary evaluation method in assessing functions ranging from sitting balance to standing balance and evaluating the dynamic balance skills needed for clinical postural and gait.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이윤복, "뇌졸중 환자들의 한국어판 Modified Version of Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke의 신뢰도와 타당도" 특수교육재활과학연구소 53 (53): 333-351, 2014

      2 안승헌, "뇌졸중 환자들을 위한 한국어판 modified Version of Trunk Impairment Scale의 신뢰도" 특수교육재활과학연구소 54 (54): 277-290, 2015

      3 Thompson, M., "Validity of the Sitting Balance Scale in older adults who are non-ambulatory or have limited functional mobility" 27 (27): 166-173, 2013

      4 Verheyden, G., "Trunk performance after stroke and relationship with balance, gait and functional ability" 20 (20): 451-458, 2006

      5 Franchignoni, F. P., "Trunk control test as an early predictor of stroke rehabilitation outcome" 28 (28): 1382-1385, 1997

      6 Duarte, E., "Trunk control test as a functional predictor in stroke patients" 34 (34): 267-272, 2002

      7 Hsieh, C., "Trunk control as an early predictor of comprehensive activities of daily living function in stroke patients" 33 (33): 2626-2630, 2002

      8 Tyson, S. F., "The relationship between balance, disability, and recovery after stroke : predictive validity of the Brunel Balance Assessment" 21 (21): 341-346, 2007

      9 Lu, W. S., "The minimal detectable change of the simplified stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement measure" 40 (40): 615-619, 2008

      10 Podsiadlo, D., "The Timed ‘Up and Go’ : a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons" 39 (39): 142-148, 1991

      1 이윤복, "뇌졸중 환자들의 한국어판 Modified Version of Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke의 신뢰도와 타당도" 특수교육재활과학연구소 53 (53): 333-351, 2014

      2 안승헌, "뇌졸중 환자들을 위한 한국어판 modified Version of Trunk Impairment Scale의 신뢰도" 특수교육재활과학연구소 54 (54): 277-290, 2015

      3 Thompson, M., "Validity of the Sitting Balance Scale in older adults who are non-ambulatory or have limited functional mobility" 27 (27): 166-173, 2013

      4 Verheyden, G., "Trunk performance after stroke and relationship with balance, gait and functional ability" 20 (20): 451-458, 2006

      5 Franchignoni, F. P., "Trunk control test as an early predictor of stroke rehabilitation outcome" 28 (28): 1382-1385, 1997

      6 Duarte, E., "Trunk control test as a functional predictor in stroke patients" 34 (34): 267-272, 2002

      7 Hsieh, C., "Trunk control as an early predictor of comprehensive activities of daily living function in stroke patients" 33 (33): 2626-2630, 2002

      8 Tyson, S. F., "The relationship between balance, disability, and recovery after stroke : predictive validity of the Brunel Balance Assessment" 21 (21): 341-346, 2007

      9 Lu, W. S., "The minimal detectable change of the simplified stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement measure" 40 (40): 615-619, 2008

      10 Podsiadlo, D., "The Timed ‘Up and Go’ : a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons" 39 (39): 142-148, 1991

      11 Karthikbabu, S., "Role of Trunk Rehabilitation on Trunk Control, Balance and Gait in Patients with Chronic Stroke : A Pre-Post Design" 2 : 61-67, 2011

      12 Gorman, S. L., "Reliability of the Function In Sitting Test (FIST)" 1-6, 2014

      13 Bohannon, R. W., "Recovery and correlates of trunk muscle strength after stroke" 18 (18): 162-167, 1995

      14 Hsueh, I. P., "Psychometric characteristics of the Barthel activities of daily living index in stroke patients" 100 (100): 526-532, 2001

      15 Cameron, M. H., "Physical rehabilitation: Evidence based examination, evaluation, and intervention" Saunders Elsevier 2007

      16 Guccione, A. A., "Physical rehabilitation" FA Davis 373-400, 2014

      17 Berg, K. O., "Measuring balance in the elderly : Preliminary development of an instrument" 41 : 304-311, 1989

      18 Carr, J, H., "Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients" 65 (65): 175-180, 1985

      19 Thorton, M., "Intra-and inter-rater reliability and validity of the Ottawa Sitting Scale : a new tool to characterise sitting balance in acute care patients" 32 (32): 1568-1575, 2010

      20 Beaton, D. E., "Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures" 25 (25): 3186-3191, 2000

      21 Portney, L., "Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice" Pearson Prentice Hall 2009

      22 Gorman, S. L., "Examining the function in sitting test for validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference in inpatient rehabilitation" 95 (95): 2304-2311, 2014

      23 허진석, "Effects of Balance Control Training on Functional Outcomes in Subacute Hemiparetic Stroke Patients" 대한재활의학회 39 (39): 995-1001, 2015

      24 Duarte, E., "Early detection of non-ambulatory survivors six months after stroke" 26 (26): 317-323, 2010

      25 Medley, A., "Development, reliability, and validity of the Sitting Balance Scale" 27 (27): 471-481, 2011

      26 Gorman, S. L., "Development and validation of the Function In Sitting Test in adults with acute stroke" 34 (34): 150-160, 2010

      27 Pavan, K., "Crosscultural adaptation and validation of the Rivermead Mobility Index in stroke patients within the brazilian cultural and language context" 68 (68): 52-55, 2010

      28 Seki, M., "Comparison of three instruments to assess changes of motor impairment in acute hemispheric stroke : the Stroke Impairment Assessment Set(SIAS), the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale(NIHSS)and the Canadian Neurological Scale(CNS)" 36 (36): 1549-1554, 2014

      29 Godi, M., "Comparison of reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the mini-BESTest and Berg Balance Scale in patients with balance disorders" 93 (93): 158-167, 2013

      30 Collin, C., "Assessing motor impairment after stroke : a pilot reliability study" 53 (53): 576-579, 1990

      31 Mao, H. F., "Analysis and comparison of the psychometric properties of three balance measures for stroke patients" 33 (33): 1022-1027, 2002

      32 Ryerson, S., "Altered trunk position sense and its relation to balance functions in people post stroke" 32 (32): 14-20, 2008

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.2 1.2 1.2
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.18 1.16 1.464 0.29
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼