도시정비사업의 건설공사비 분쟁에 대한 실증적 고찰 = (An) empirical study of the construction cost disputes in the urban renewal projects

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Urban Improvement Projects are cases where the private property of each individual and property right is compulsorily disposed under the establishment of the Urban and Residential Environment Improvement Act.
In other words, the opinions of the majority are coercing the property disposal of some people. As such, if implemented according to the above regulation, then of course, it must correspond to all standards according to procedure and implementation as well as to transparent and public benefit.

In the past, dispute about management disposal related to project implementation occurring among union members was enforced by a civil trial. Yet only recently, the union, which is a representative organization of a union member, was bestowed the position of an administrative organization, and a transfer was made to an administrative lawsuit according to a precedent of the Supreme Court.

The position of a government employee is applied to the head of the union who is the representative of union members and to the management members of the union. Thus, the state of affairs is such that, in terms of a criminal offense, added penalty is imposed conforming to a government employee.

The union head and management members must be selected only if they have been in the position of a native resident for a certain length of time according to the establishment of the Urban and Residential Environment Improvement Act rather than chosen from a construction specialist or administrative specialist. Realistically and actually, the union members in reality do not have a clear job and also comprise of not only non specialists but also the aged class.

In respect to contractual relationship of a construction company, a design company, a maintenance company, an engineer company, etc. which are in a contractual relationship with a union that is at odds with the rights of a union, a firm contract is a matter of principle like all agreements. Yet, in the case of all construction works, a change to the agreement amount due to circumstantial change is inevitable.

Still, no standard whatsoever relating to adjustment of agreement amount due to such a circumstantial change has been prepared.

As discussed in Chapter 3, in the case of a public construction work, the construction project is implemented by a specialist group from each field. Also, a manual even for selection of a construction project manager and audit work has been prepared. Thus, the state of affairs is such that a strict standard and procedure are prepared and implemented for adjustment of agreement amount due to circumstantial change during construction and for disagreement over the agreement according to the law on consolidated construction technology management.
Yet, in the case of a redevelopment/rebuilding construction project, no standard or procedure has been prepared except for a phrase on mutual consultation. Thus, it is permeated with causes of endless dispute. It is true that there are changes to rights of several tens of billions of won in property due to such a trivial difference of opinion.

Hence, as mentioned in chapter 2, the management members of a union of redevelopment/rebuilding maintenance union correspond to the position of a government employee, and the management and disposal related to the property among the union members are processed by an administrative litigation. As such, in respect to the agreement concluded by the concerned persons of the agreement, it is judged that for differences of opinion after the agreement or adjustment of agreement amount due to circumstantial change, the “law on agreement which has the state as a concerned party” and its subsidiary “standard on construction agreement implementation”, notification, and others, which have already been prepared by the Ministry of Strategy and Finance, should apply with necessary modifications.

Thus, it is judged that regarding difference of opinion after agreement or circumstantial change related to all future agreements, a union should include the phrase, “the state agreement law will be applied with necessary modifications” or should make such a clause mandatory for city and residential environment maintenance law, and others.

Also, it is judged that in terms of implementation according to the law” related to such an agreement where the state is a concerned party, a 3rd audit institution, the competent authorities, etc. should audit whether implementation has been made or not. Or, the construction project manager mentioned in chapter 4 should act as a proxy.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 제1장 서 론
• 제1절 연구의 배경 및 목적 1
• 제2절 연구의 범위 및 방법 2
• 제2장 도시정비사업의 개요 및 분쟁발생요소
• 제1절 도시정비사업에 대한 이해 6
• 1. 정비사업의 유형 및 시행방법 6
• 2. 정비사업의 유형, 주체 및 단계별 현황 8
• 제2절 도시정비법에 대한 이해 12
• 1. 도시정비법의 제정 경위 12
• 2. 도시정비법의 제정 13
• 제3절 도시정비사업의 절차 15
• 1. 사업준비단계 15
• 2. 사업시행단계 19
• 3. 관리처분단계 20
• 4. 사업완료단계 21
• 제4절 도시정비사업의 분쟁발생요소 22
• 1. 정비사업조합의 의의 22
• 2. 분쟁발생 원인과 유형 24
• 제5절 도시정비사업의 특수성 28
• 제3장 도시정비사업의 건설공사비 분석
• 제1절 관급건설공사계약의 특징 30
• 1. 국가계약법의 성격 31
• 2. 관급건설공사 계약의 유형 32
• 3. 국가계약법상 사정변경에 따른 계약금액의 조정 38
• 제2절 도시정비사업 공사계약의 특징 49
• 1. 도시정비사업 공사계약방식의 특수정 49
• 2. 도시정비사업의 사정변경에 따른 계약금액조정 선결사항 55
• 3. 현행 도시정비사업의 건설공사비 정산의 문제점 57
• 제3절 도시정비사업 건설공사비 정산의 분쟁사례 59
• 1. 설계변경으로 인한 계약금액의 조정 59
• 2. 물가변동으로 인한 계약금액의 조정 61
• 3. 계약불완전 이행으로 인한 계약금액의 조정 62
• 제4절 도시정비사업 공사계약의 적용 64
• 제4장 도시정비사업의 건설사업관리를 통한 분쟁해결
• 제1절 공공건설공사의 건설사업관리의 필요성 67
• 제2절 도시정비사업의 정비관리업 현황 68
• 1. 도시정비사업에서의 정비관리업자의 개념 68
• 2. 기존 정비관리업의 문제점 70
• 제3절 도시정비사업의 건설사업관리의 보완 72
• 1. 건설사업관리의 정의 및 필요성 72
• 2. 건설사업관리의 업무범위 75
• 3. 정비사업의 정비사업전문관리와 건설사업관리 연계방안 78
• 4. 건설사업관리 도입시의 문제점 및 개선방안 80
• 제4절 도시정비 건설사업의 건설사업관리 사례연구 82
• 1. 고덕주공1단지 재건축아파트 건설사업관리 82
• 2. 주요업무수행 요약 84
• 3. 건설사업관리 적용효과 89
• 제5절 도시정비사업의 건설사업관리의 적용 90
• 제5장 결 론 92
• 참 고 문 헌 102
• Abstract 104
• 부록 도시정비 건설사업 중 건설공사비 변경에 관한 기준자료 107
• Ⅰ. 도시정비 건설사업에 적용되는 기준 107
• Ⅱ. 도시정비 건설사업에서 강제하지 않는 참조기준 125
• Ⅲ. FIDIC제정 국제표준 건설공사 계약기준 161