RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      총허용어획량관리법의 입법론적 연구 = A Study on Legislation for Total Allowable Catch Management Act

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76398510

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Total allowable catch management regime which is different from the previous fishing management regimes was introduced with the entry into force of UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1994. Total allowable catch management regime is based on total allowable catch. by considering biological, technological, social, and economical factors. on the basis of MSY calculated in biology. There are the conmmon reasons for adopting total allowable catch as a fishing management. Because it is easy to manage the resources of the vast fishing ground by prohibiting from fishing activities on the relevant kinds of fish when the amount of fishing catch allowed. loaded on land. comes up to the catch level aimed after the fishing activities began as fixed total allowable catch, and to protect from over-fishing on a simple fishing resource and from devastation as well as the solution of the fundamental fishery problem through maintaining general source management system so as to develop the fishery. But olympic and individual quota method as total allowable catch management regime are adopted in our country and made problems as follows: fishing competition between fisheries. over-development of fishing resources. fishing over the amount of allowable catch. discarding a low-price fish. marine accidents and disorder of fishing by hard fishing activities. retarding investment on fishing facilities and development skills. weakening business by investment on required facilities. inspecting problems on fishing activities. As total allowable catch management is not issued as a single act and ruled by a section of fishing industry law. it is not sufficient to carry out total allowable catch management. The questions to protect fishing resource are basically belong to scientists. but the actions to protect must be applied to any people without any discrimination. Nevertheless. total allowable catch management is going to be made mainly for fishing groups in our country. Allocating fishing quota to associations and people as their results may be specific and permanent in the extent of the usage of fishing resources and may retard development of fishery and technology. Accordingly total allowable catch mariagement act which is harmony with the previous fish catch management regime as well as technical management regime in order to use and manage fishery resources effectively must be enacted. therefore the aim of this study is the legislation and it's contents
      번역하기

      Total allowable catch management regime which is different from the previous fishing management regimes was introduced with the entry into force of UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1994. Total allowable catch management regime is based on total all...

      Total allowable catch management regime which is different from the previous fishing management regimes was introduced with the entry into force of UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1994. Total allowable catch management regime is based on total allowable catch. by considering biological, technological, social, and economical factors. on the basis of MSY calculated in biology. There are the conmmon reasons for adopting total allowable catch as a fishing management. Because it is easy to manage the resources of the vast fishing ground by prohibiting from fishing activities on the relevant kinds of fish when the amount of fishing catch allowed. loaded on land. comes up to the catch level aimed after the fishing activities began as fixed total allowable catch, and to protect from over-fishing on a simple fishing resource and from devastation as well as the solution of the fundamental fishery problem through maintaining general source management system so as to develop the fishery. But olympic and individual quota method as total allowable catch management regime are adopted in our country and made problems as follows: fishing competition between fisheries. over-development of fishing resources. fishing over the amount of allowable catch. discarding a low-price fish. marine accidents and disorder of fishing by hard fishing activities. retarding investment on fishing facilities and development skills. weakening business by investment on required facilities. inspecting problems on fishing activities. As total allowable catch management is not issued as a single act and ruled by a section of fishing industry law. it is not sufficient to carry out total allowable catch management. The questions to protect fishing resource are basically belong to scientists. but the actions to protect must be applied to any people without any discrimination. Nevertheless. total allowable catch management is going to be made mainly for fishing groups in our country. Allocating fishing quota to associations and people as their results may be specific and permanent in the extent of the usage of fishing resources and may retard development of fishery and technology. Accordingly total allowable catch mariagement act which is harmony with the previous fish catch management regime as well as technical management regime in order to use and manage fishery resources effectively must be enacted. therefore the aim of this study is the legislation and it's contents

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 총허용어획량 관리에 관한 현행 법규
      • Ⅲ. 독립입법의 필요성
      • Ⅳ. 입법의 기본원칙
      • Ⅴ. 주요 내용의 구성
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 총허용어획량 관리에 관한 현행 법규
      • Ⅲ. 독립입법의 필요성
      • Ⅳ. 입법의 기본원칙
      • Ⅴ. 주요 내용의 구성
      • Ⅵ. 결론
      • 참고문헌
      • Abstract
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.5 0.5 0.53
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.51 0.5 0.586 0.29
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼