RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCIE SCOPUS

      SYNTAX Score and SYNTAX Score II Can Predict the Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Left Main and/or 3-Vessel Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Contemporary Cobalt-Chromium Everolimus-Eluting Stent Era

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106475585

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background and Objectives: The impact of SYNergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus and cardiac surgery score (SS) and SS II in patients who receive percutaneous coronary intervention with second-generation everolimus-eluting stents...

      Background and Objectives: The impact of SYNergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus and cardiac surgery score (SS) and SS II in patients who receive percutaneous coronary intervention with second-generation everolimus-eluting stents (EES) has not been fully validated.
      Methods: The SS, SS II were calculated in 1,248 patients with left main and/or 3-vessel disease treated with EES. Patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE; all-cause death, any myocardial infarction (MI), any revascularization) and target lesion failure (TLF: cardiac death, target-vessel MI, target lesion revascularization) were analyzed.
      Results: The mean SS was 21.1±9.6. Three-year POCE increased according to the SS group (15.2% vs. 19.9% vs. 27.4% for low (≤22), intermediate (≥23, ≤32), high (≥33) SS groups, p<0.001). By multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis, SS group was an independent predictor of 3-year POCE (hazard ratio, 1.324; 95% confidence interval, 1.095–1.601; p=0.004). The receiver operating characteristic curves revealed that the SS II was superior to the SS for 3-year POCE prediction (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.611 vs. 0.669 for SS vs. SS II, p=0.019), but not for 3-year TLF (AUC: 0.631 vs. 0.660 for SS vs. SS II, p=0.996). In subgroup analysis, SS II was superior to SS in patients with cardiovascular clinical risk factors, and in those presenting as stable angina.
      Conclusions: The usefulness of SS and SS II was still valid in patients with left main and/or 3-vessel disease. SS II was superior to SS for the prediction of patient-oriented outcomes, but not for lesion-oriented outcomes.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Xu B, "Validation and comparison of the long-term prognostic capability of the SYNTAX score-II among 1, 528 consecutive patients who underwent left main percutaneous coronary intervention" 7 : 1128-1137, 2014

      2 Kang J, "Usefulness of the baseline syntax score to predict 3-year outcome after complete revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention" 118 : 641-646, 2016

      3 Song Y, "Usefulness of the SYNTAX score II to validate 2-year outcomes in patients with complex coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention : a large single-center study" 92 : 40-47, 2018

      4 Park KW, "Usefulness of the SYNTAX and clinical SYNTAX scores in predicting clinical outcome after unrestricted use of sirolimus-and everolimus-eluting stents" 77 : 2912-2921, 2013

      5 Park KW, "The impact of residual coronary lesions on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention : residual SYNTAX score after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients from the Efficacy of Xience/Promus versus Cypher in rEducing Late Loss after stENTing(EXCELLENT)registry" 167 : 384-392, 2014

      6 Navarese EP, "Safety and efficacy outcomes of first and second generation durable polymer drug eluting stents and biodegradable polymer biolimus eluting stents in clinical practice : comprehensive network meta-analysis" 347 : f6530-, 2013

      7 He J, "SYNTAX score-II predicts long-term mortality in patients who underwent left main percutaneous coronary intervention treated with second-generation drug-eluting stents" 58 : 344-350, 2017

      8 Serruys PW, "Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease" 360 : 961-972, 2009

      9 Cavalcante R, "Impact of the SYNTAX scores I and II in patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary disease : a pooled analysis of patient level data from the SYNTAX, PRECOMBAT, and BEST trials" 38 : 1969-1977, 2017

      10 Nam CW, "Functional SYNTAX score for risk assessment in multivessel coronary artery disease" 58 : 1211-1218, 2011

      1 Xu B, "Validation and comparison of the long-term prognostic capability of the SYNTAX score-II among 1, 528 consecutive patients who underwent left main percutaneous coronary intervention" 7 : 1128-1137, 2014

      2 Kang J, "Usefulness of the baseline syntax score to predict 3-year outcome after complete revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention" 118 : 641-646, 2016

      3 Song Y, "Usefulness of the SYNTAX score II to validate 2-year outcomes in patients with complex coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention : a large single-center study" 92 : 40-47, 2018

      4 Park KW, "Usefulness of the SYNTAX and clinical SYNTAX scores in predicting clinical outcome after unrestricted use of sirolimus-and everolimus-eluting stents" 77 : 2912-2921, 2013

      5 Park KW, "The impact of residual coronary lesions on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention : residual SYNTAX score after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients from the Efficacy of Xience/Promus versus Cypher in rEducing Late Loss after stENTing(EXCELLENT)registry" 167 : 384-392, 2014

      6 Navarese EP, "Safety and efficacy outcomes of first and second generation durable polymer drug eluting stents and biodegradable polymer biolimus eluting stents in clinical practice : comprehensive network meta-analysis" 347 : f6530-, 2013

      7 He J, "SYNTAX score-II predicts long-term mortality in patients who underwent left main percutaneous coronary intervention treated with second-generation drug-eluting stents" 58 : 344-350, 2017

      8 Serruys PW, "Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease" 360 : 961-972, 2009

      9 Cavalcante R, "Impact of the SYNTAX scores I and II in patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary disease : a pooled analysis of patient level data from the SYNTAX, PRECOMBAT, and BEST trials" 38 : 1969-1977, 2017

      10 Nam CW, "Functional SYNTAX score for risk assessment in multivessel coronary artery disease" 58 : 1211-1218, 2011

      11 Morice MC, "Five-year outcomes in patients with left main disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting in the synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery trial" 129 : 2388-2394, 2014

      12 Pencina MJ, "Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker : from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond" 27 : 157-172, 2008

      13 Kolh P, "ESC/EACTS myocardial revascularization guidelines 2014" 35 : 3235-3236, 2014

      14 Chieffo A, "Drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease. The DELTA registry : a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment" 5 : 718-727, 2012

      15 Head SJ, "Coronary artery bypass grafting vs. percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with three-vessel disease : final five-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial" 35 : 2821-2830, 2014

      16 Mohr FW, "Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease : 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial" 381 : 629-638, 2013

      17 Palmerini T, "Clinical outcomes with bioabsorbable polymer-versus durable polymer-based drug-eluting and bare-metal stents : evidence from a comprehensive network meta-analysis" 63 : 299-307, 2014

      18 Kang SH, "Biodegradable-polymer drug-eluting stents vs. bare metal stents vs. durable-polymer drug-eluting stents : a systematic review and Bayesian approach network meta-analysis" 35 : 1147-1158, 2014

      19 Bangalore S, "Bare metal stents, durable polymer drug eluting stents, and biodegradable polymer drug eluting stents for coronary artery disease : mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis" 347 : f6625-, 2013

      20 Farooq V, "Anatomical and clinical characteristics to guide decision making between coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for individual patients : development and validation of SYNTAX score II" 381 : 639-650, 2013

      21 Garg S, "A new tool for the risk stratification of patients with complex coronary artery disease : the clinical SYNTAX score" 3 : 317-326, 2010

      22 Amsterdam EA, "2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes : a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines" 64 : e139-228, 2014

      23 Hillis LD, "2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. Developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons" 58 : e123-210, 2011

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-05-15 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한순환기학회 -> 대한심장학회
      영문명 : The Korean Society Of Circulation -> The Korean Society of Cardiology
      KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-08-02 학술지등록 한글명 : Korean Circulation Journal
      외국어명 : Korean Circulation Journal
      KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.13 0.34 0.71
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.45 0.36 0.52 0.12
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼