초ㆍ중등학교의 교육환경 조성의무와 학생의 학습권 보장

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

It is usually said that the most important impact to threaten the right to learn of student is the invasion of safety for educational environment in school. that is, a life guard for problem students and punishment for them, violence in school, bully problem, criminal case caused by punishment and the other several safety accident caused in school. The invasion of safety for educational environment in school is the essential factor to invade the right to learn of student. Korea constitution article 35 (1) said that "all citizens shall have the right to a healthy and pleasant environment. The state and all citizens shall endeavor to protect the environment". So all citizens have the right to a healthy and pleasant environment and the state has the duty to guarantee these right of citizens. These environment right means that to live in healthy and pleasant environment in narrow, just to live in environment without invasion of life and health. But in wide, to live in good social environment such as cultural environment, road, park, education, medical care are involved in these rights. In these days, the right to environment means that not only natural environment but also cultural and social environment. By the way, how much safety of our educational environment in school even though these constitutional right to environment? What they are doing for protecting the invasion of safety for educational environment in school and to protect the light to learn of student. We need to discuss about how to do their duty to making safe educational environment. To promote safe educational environment, the school and educational authority as well as student and parents need to change their mind for educational environment and to do something. that is, the change of mind of teachers, students, educational authority and parents and to prepare legal and institutional system for them are needed. First, it is needed to change of mind for the importance about educational environment in school and the right to learn of student. Second, the code for protecting school violence is needed to amend more effective and detail so that to applicate any problems raising in school.Third, educational authority, schools and NGO are needed to do something for removing the invasion of safety for educational environment in school and making safe educational environment by legal and institutional system.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서설
• Ⅱ. 국가 교육권한의 존재의의로서의 학생의 학습권
• 1. 인격형성권으로서의 학습권의 의의
• 2. 학습권의 헌법적 근거
• Ⅲ. 생존권적 학습권으로서의 교육을 받을 권리
• 1. 교육을 받을 권리의 의의
• 2. 교육을 받을 권리의 내용
• Ⅳ. 초․중등학교의 교육환경 조성의무
• 1. 안전한 교육환경 조성의 필요성
• 2. 학생생활지도와 학생징계
• 3. 학생체벌
• 4. 학교폭력과 집단괴롭힘
• 5. 학교안전사고
• Ⅴ. 결론
• 참고문헌
• ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 학교바로세우기실천연대, "흔들리는 교육환경 어떻게 해결할 것인가?" 2000

2 권영성, "헌법학원론" 법문사 2008

3 김철수, "헌법학개론" 박영사 2008

4 헌법재판소, "헌법재판소 1999.3.25 선고, 97헌마130결정, 헌법재판소판례집 제11권 1집"

5 헌법재판소, "헌법재판소 1995.2.23 선고 91헌마204결정, 헌법재판소판례집 제7권1집"

6 헌법재판소, "헌법재판소 1989.10.27 선고, 89헌마56 결정, 헌법재판소판례집 제1권"

7 한승희, "한?미 학교안전사고 판례연구" 대한교육법학회 (11) : 1999

8 박재윤, "학생징계제도와 운영실태" 대한교육법학회 (9) : 1997

9 조석훈, "학생징계의 특성분석" 서울대학교 1996

10 황홍규, "학생사고와 학교?교원 등의 법적 책임" 대한교육법학회 (13) : 2001

11 표시열, "학생과 교원의 교육권,무엇이 문제이고 어떻게 구현시킬 것인가?in 학생 및 교원의 교육권,어떻게 보호할 것인가?" 2007

12 김태완, "학교안전사고에 따른 교원의 책임범위와 교권침해" 대한교육법학회 16 (16): 2004

13 박재윤, "학교선택권 및 학교참여 문제와 헌법판례" 한국교육법학회 6-7 : 2001

14 성낙인, "부모의 자녀교육에 관한 권리" 고시계 1995

15 대법원, "대법원 1996. 9. 20, 95 누 7994, 공 1996, 3207"

16 대법원, "대법원 1992.7.14. 선고 91누4737 판결"

17 대법원, "대법원 1991.5.28. 선고 90다17972 판결"

18 대법원, "대법원 1991.11.22. 선고 91누2144 판결"

19 대법원, "대법원 1990.2.27. 선고 89다카16178 판결"

20 대법원, "대법원 1990.10.30. 선고 90도1456 판결"

21 대법원, "대법원 1988.1.12. 선고 87다카2240 판결"

22 대법원, "대법원 1980.1.29. 선고 97다1896 판결"

23 양건, "교육주체상호간의 법적 관계-교육권의 갈등과 그 조정-" 한국교육개발원 2003

24 표시열, "교육정책과 법" 박영사 2002

25 이돈희, "교육의 수월성 개념, 교육의 수월성을 지향하는 교육개혁의추진, in 현장교육연구운동주제 해설집" 한국교원단체총연합회 1996

26 강인수, "교육법연구" 문음사 1989

27 신현직, "교육기본권에 관한 연구" 서울대학교 1992

28 小林植樹, "現代基本權の展開" 岩波書店 1976

29 "東京地方裁判所 昭和49年 7月 16日 判決"

30 "日本最高裁判所 昭和63年 7月 15日 判決"

31 "日本最高裁判所 昭和51年 5月 21日 判決(學力테스트 判決)"

32 "日本最高裁判所 昭和51年 5月 21日 判決"

33 室井 力, "敎育法の基礎" 靑林書院新社 1978

34 兼子仁, "敎育法" 有斐閣 1987

35 兼子仁, "敎育判例百選(第3版)" 有斐閣 1998

36 牧柾名, "敎育を受ける權利を保障する內容と條件 in 敎育法學の課題" 岩波書店 1974

37 永井憲一, "敎育を受ける權利, 敎育法の基礎" 靑林書院新社 1978

38 奧平康弘, "敎育を受ける權利, 憲法III?人權(2)" 有斐閣 179-, 1987

39 伊ケ崎曉生, "敎育の條件整備, とは何か, 公敎育と條件整備の法制" 有斐閣 (8) : 1979

40 堀尾輝久, "敎育と人權" 岩波書店 1977

41 室井修, "子どもの學習權とその制度的 保障, 敎育權と學習權(講座敎育法 2)" エイデル硏究所 1981

42 兼子仁, "國民の敎育權" 岩波新書 1971

43 相良惟一, "各國の憲法と敎育" 民主敎育協會 1972

44 相良惟一, "兩親の敎育權の實定法的考察 in 京都大學敎育學部紀要" 1962

45 小倉庫次, "アメリカ合衆國州憲法の硏究" 有斐閣 1970

46 Louis Fischer, "Teachers and the Law" 1999

47 H. Heckel, "Schulrechtskunde" Aulf 2000

48 T. Paine, "Right of Man, in 人間の權利" 岩波書店 1981

49 J.S.Moskowitz, "Parental Rights and State Education, in 50th Washington Law Review" 1975

50 Smith v, "Mount Pleasant Public Schools, 285 F. Supp, 2d 987"

51 Lants,?Mary A., "Lentz School Security. Thomson West, Cleveland, Ohio. Yell, Mitchell L. and Erik Drasgow, 2005. No Child Left Behind: A Guide for Professions" Person Education, Inc. 2006

52 Antoine Prost, "Histoire de l’enseignement en France 1800-1967, A. Colin? Conn, Kathlen, "Bullying, Harassment, and Student Threats: Are Schools of the Courts Working Together?"" 203 (203): 005

53 "Figures : Swedis National Agency for Education, quoted by David Green, Choice in schools benefits the poor" Daily Telegraph 2006

54 J. M. Auby, "Droit public (Cours ??entaire de droit)" Sirey 1964

55 Goss v. Lopez, "419U.S.565, 95 S. Ct. 729"

56 Meyer v. Nebraska, "262 U.S. 390, 43 S. Ct. 625 (U. S. Neb. 1923)"