RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    과학과 이념으로서의 진화: 캔자스 교과서 논쟁의 경우 = Evolution as Science and Ideology: Kansas Textbook Controversy

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103990235

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This article documents the recent evolution controversy in Kansas. In August 1999 the Kansas Board of Education passed the new Science Education Standards that excluded some of the fundamental concepts of modern science, macro-evolution and Big Bang. This exclusion stirred up heated controversy nationwide. This article focuses on the ideological conflicts expressed in this controversy.Besides the ideological dimension of this controversy, two things are significant in the history of creation-evolution controversy in America. First, a new anti-evolution strategy emerged. The new Science Education Standards excluded evolution in the state test for Kansas highschool students. An immediate implication of this decision is that even if students do not study evolution they will not be disadvantaged in entering universities in Kansas as evolution is not included in the test. If the Standards was implemented, it would seriously weaken the evolution education in the public schools in Kansas. Second, the Intelligent Design emerged as a new force. Though the old scientific creationism initiated the Kansas controversy, the Intelligent Design quickly came in the forefront. This signified an important change in the recent history of the creation-evolution controversy and needs further study.
    번역하기

    This article documents the recent evolution controversy in Kansas. In August 1999 the Kansas Board of Education passed the new Science Education Standards that excluded some of the fundamental concepts of modern science, macro-evolution and Big Bang. ...

    This article documents the recent evolution controversy in Kansas. In August 1999 the Kansas Board of Education passed the new Science Education Standards that excluded some of the fundamental concepts of modern science, macro-evolution and Big Bang. This exclusion stirred up heated controversy nationwide. This article focuses on the ideological conflicts expressed in this controversy.Besides the ideological dimension of this controversy, two things are significant in the history of creation-evolution controversy in America. First, a new anti-evolution strategy emerged. The new Science Education Standards excluded evolution in the state test for Kansas highschool students. An immediate implication of this decision is that even if students do not study evolution they will not be disadvantaged in entering universities in Kansas as evolution is not included in the test. If the Standards was implemented, it would seriously weaken the evolution education in the public schools in Kansas. Second, the Intelligent Design emerged as a new force. Though the old scientific creationism initiated the Kansas controversy, the Intelligent Design quickly came in the forefront. This signified an important change in the recent history of the creation-evolution controversy and needs further study.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-29 학술지명변경 외국어명 : HANGUK KWAHAK-SA HAKHOE-JI -> The Korean Journal for the History of Science KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.42 0.42 0.46
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.48 0.47 0.697 0.13
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼