RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      도시계획의 지침으로서의 도시기본계획에 관한 연구

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76354761

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      An Urban Master Plan (UMP) is a set of long term goals and policies, generally covering entire municipalities and has a long time spam, around 20 years. In Korea an UMP system was introduced in 1981 to guarantee the coherence and consistency of city planning practice, by that time there was still no legal basis to support such practice in coherence to the urbanization plan. Later on the 1990's its role as guidance to city planning was emphasized and formed a legal basis, instead of serving as model and rule to the city planning practice. In 2002 the UMP was vested with new roles and importance as the city planning range was extended into rural areas, also serving as base for all city planning decisions. In order to use UMP as base for city planning decisions, from now on, some problems must be tackled about the 'making' and 'practice' of UMP's. An Open Hearing System has been used as a way of introducing citizen's participation, but it was detected that there are some problems related to participation timing, citizen's opinions and its reflects on the plan; requiring information and trainmen of citizens, molding a new conferencing technique, and guaranteeing of municipalities planning power. The UMP must contain general goals, objective, policies and implementation programs for municipal planning and development decisions to be feasible. All UMP elements must have consistency and be expressed in easy ways to be understood. Actual UMP analysis results are: It is not internally consistent; each element drawn up independently, and appeared not too clear. Comparisons were made between city planning and development project which had UMP practices and it showed that; there was no consistency on development density due to development project in urban areas besides there was no accord on rural areas zoning within UMPs.
      번역하기

      An Urban Master Plan (UMP) is a set of long term goals and policies, generally covering entire municipalities and has a long time spam, around 20 years. In Korea an UMP system was introduced in 1981 to guarantee the coherence and consistency of city p...

      An Urban Master Plan (UMP) is a set of long term goals and policies, generally covering entire municipalities and has a long time spam, around 20 years. In Korea an UMP system was introduced in 1981 to guarantee the coherence and consistency of city planning practice, by that time there was still no legal basis to support such practice in coherence to the urbanization plan. Later on the 1990's its role as guidance to city planning was emphasized and formed a legal basis, instead of serving as model and rule to the city planning practice. In 2002 the UMP was vested with new roles and importance as the city planning range was extended into rural areas, also serving as base for all city planning decisions. In order to use UMP as base for city planning decisions, from now on, some problems must be tackled about the 'making' and 'practice' of UMP's. An Open Hearing System has been used as a way of introducing citizen's participation, but it was detected that there are some problems related to participation timing, citizen's opinions and its reflects on the plan; requiring information and trainmen of citizens, molding a new conferencing technique, and guaranteeing of municipalities planning power. The UMP must contain general goals, objective, policies and implementation programs for municipal planning and development decisions to be feasible. All UMP elements must have consistency and be expressed in easy ways to be understood. Actual UMP analysis results are: It is not internally consistent; each element drawn up independently, and appeared not too clear. Comparisons were made between city planning and development project which had UMP practices and it showed that; there was no consistency on development density due to development project in urban areas besides there was no accord on rural areas zoning within UMPs.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼